|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 4, 2024 21:55:21 GMT
Did you not get my message the last time? You're a two-faced c*unt, and I got no interest in engaging with you. You don't get to be an utter dick and act all buddy buddy when it suits you. Please, kindly fuck off. Signed, A crazed Denzel Stan.Why do you gotta be such a dick man? I don't get you. I'm just slightly chuckling at how hardcore you go to bat for Denzel. It's not a bad thing. Then you'll say..... look at the pacino fanboy talk about Pacino all day long. But it feels like he has less of a desire to prove a point about Pacino being the goat or something. And he talks about pacino twice in one page of posting. I think a less frequent volume than you talk about Denzel. But even then it's ok. But you getting a sense of misplaced dickness over me slightly chuckling at your Denzel fandom seems extremely weird to me. Oh fuck off dude. You don't get to be a rude ass dick to someone, then start crying about , "wah,wah, why's he picking on me". You literally randomly dissed me again today on the Nicole Kidman thread today, and we weren't even having a conversation. Maybe you wanted my attention or something. You've made it clear very loudly how amused you are that I'm a Denzel Stan. I've made it clear that I find you to be rude asshole, particularly since I treated you with respect and fairness for most of the years we interacted here. I don't give a shit how bemused you are about anything . I find it to be a weak excuse for you to be a rude asshole. And I treat people as they treat me. So you'll get that treatment from me until you learn some fucking manners.
|
|
|
Post by urbanpatrician on Feb 4, 2024 22:10:08 GMT
Why do you gotta be such a dick man? I don't get you. I'm just slightly chuckling at how hardcore you go to bat for Denzel. It's not a bad thing. Then you'll say..... look at the pacino fanboy talk about Pacino all day long. But it feels like he has less of a desire to prove a point about Pacino being the goat or something. And he talks about pacino twice in one page of posting. I think a less frequent volume than you talk about Denzel. But even then it's ok. But you getting a sense of misplaced dickness over me slightly chuckling at your Denzel fandom seems extremely weird to me. Oh fuck off dude. You don't get to be a rude ass dick to someone, then start crying about , "wah,wah, why's he picking on me". You've made it clear very loudly how amused you are that I'm a Denzel Stan. I've made it clear that I find you to be rude asshole, particularly since I treated you with respect and fairness for most of the years we interacted here. I don't give a shit how bemused you are about anything . I find it to be a weak excuse for you to be a rude asshole. And I treat people as they treat me. So you'll get that treatment from me until you learn some fucking manners. DAMN man. It's hard to reason with anyone who loves Denzel so much he's insecure to the point that he starts aligning me with the other posters. I didn't know being amused once or twice counts as being a rude asshole or making it loud and clear how amused I am. But ok... you're not engaging in me anymore. I'll remember to avoid all future threads with Denzel, cause damn.... those don't go over well.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 4, 2024 22:23:21 GMT
Oh fuck off dude. You don't get to be a rude ass dick to someone, then start crying about , "wah,wah, why's he picking on me". You've made it clear very loudly how amused you are that I'm a Denzel Stan. I've made it clear that I find you to be rude asshole, particularly since I treated you with respect and fairness for most of the years we interacted here. I don't give a shit how bemused you are about anything . I find it to be a weak excuse for you to be a rude asshole. And I treat people as they treat me. So you'll get that treatment from me until you learn some fucking manners. DAMN man. It's hard to reason with anyone who loves Denzel so much he's insecure to the point that he starts aligning me with the other posters. I didn't know being amused once or twice counts as being a rude asshole or making it loud and clear how amused I am. But ok... you're not engaging in me anymore. I'll remember to avoid all future threads with Denzel, cause damn.... those don't go over well. That's nice. You're the one who wanted my attention today. On this thread AND the Nicole Kidman thread ( where you managed to get in the Denzel stan sneak diss...when we weren't even talking ). I'm perfectly fine not interacting with someone who shows me contempt. I'm not even on threads talking about Washington or talking to you, but you are still sneak dissing and throwing in random jabs because what, you want my attention...you want me to notice you..... I'm not sure exactly. Like I said, we got nothing to talk about till you learn how to behave. This really has fuck all to do with Washington (It's just the catalyst you chose to hang your hat on, because you want to show how tough you are or impress Pac or whatever....I dunno), and everything to do with you not understanding the concept that you can't just talk to people anyway you feel like, and recieve no pushback. You are free to talk to me like an asshole, and I'll treat you like one. You want me to talk to you with respect, then show some.
|
|
|
Post by mhynson27 on Feb 4, 2024 23:59:14 GMT
DAMN man. It's hard to reason with anyone who loves Denzel so much he's insecure to the point that he starts aligning me with the other posters. I didn't know being amused once or twice counts as being a rude asshole or making it loud and clear how amused I am. But ok... you're not engaging in me anymore. I'll remember to avoid all future threads with Denzel, cause damn.... those don't go over well. That's nice. You're the one who wanted my attention today. On this thread AND the Nicole Kidman thread ( where you managed to get in the Denzel stan sneak diss...when we weren't even talking ). I'm perfectly fine not interacting with someone who shows me contempt. I'm not even on threads talking about Washington or talking to you, but you are still sneak dissing and throwing in random jabs because what, you want my attention...you want me to notice you..... I'm not sure exactly. Like I said, we got nothing to talk about till you learn how to behave. This really has fuck all to do with Washington (It's just the catalyst you chose to hang your hat on, because you want to show how tough you are or impress Pac or whatever....I dunno), and everything to do with you not understanding the concept that you can't just talk to people anyway you feel like, and recieve no pushback. You are free to talk to me like an asshole, and I'll treat you like one. You want me to talk to you with respect, then show some. Well except for yesterday when your first order of business in a beautiful thread discussing the 10 year anniversary of PSH's untimely death, was to slobber on Denzel some more.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 5, 2024 0:38:34 GMT
That's nice. You're the one who wanted my attention today. On this thread AND the Nicole Kidman thread ( where you managed to get in the Denzel stan sneak diss...when we weren't even talking ). I'm perfectly fine not interacting with someone who shows me contempt. I'm not even on threads talking about Washington or talking to you, but you are still sneak dissing and throwing in random jabs because what, you want my attention...you want me to notice you..... I'm not sure exactly. Like I said, we got nothing to talk about till you learn how to behave. This really has fuck all to do with Washington (It's just the catalyst you chose to hang your hat on, because you want to show how tough you are or impress Pac or whatever....I dunno), and everything to do with you not understanding the concept that you can't just talk to people anyway you feel like, and recieve no pushback. You are free to talk to me like an asshole, and I'll treat you like one. You want me to talk to you with respect, then show some. Well except for yesterday when your first order of business in a beautiful thread discussing the 10 year anniversary of PSH's untimely death, was to slobber on Denzel some more. Ok ....I'm just blocking you now. Something I rarely do, but you get off on this stuff and I'm bored of dealing with you on this shit. You don't like me, how I support what I like, or my posts, well now you no longer have to read them. Win-win.You waste too much of my time and energy with this potshotting shit. Like I said to the other shit-stirrer, I'm no longer here for your entertainment or when you feel like having a little message board dust-up. Enjoy pretending not to read my posts any longer
|
|
|
Post by mikediastavrone96 on Feb 5, 2024 3:33:03 GMT
Even though I'm not a fan,we should probably add Sydney Sweeney to the list.She is very,very ambitious. it could all go tits up Ha. Yeah, it feels like Sweeney might have the juice to establish herself as a movie star. She's doing a smart job with managing her career now. Brought back the rom-com (an R rated one at that), playing the supporting part of a superhero film so if it does well she gets some shine and if it doesn't it isn't all on her, got herself as the lead of an indie psychological horror film for a different look that establishes more acting credibility. For as long as Zendaya has been teased as the next big star, Challengers will be the first real test of that after she's mostly played supporting parts in established IP and being the co-lead in a failed late-season awards play with Malcolm & Marie. I expect Challengers to do solid business, but it remains to be seen her impact as a draw for movies as of yet.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 5, 2024 4:10:42 GMT
Ha. Yeah, it feels like Sweeney might have the juice to establish herself as a movie star. She's doing a smart job with managing her career now. Brought back the rom-com (an R rated one at that), playing the supporting part of a superhero film so if it does well she gets some shine and if it doesn't it isn't all on her, got herself as the lead of an indie psychological horror film for a different look that establishes more acting credibility. For as long as Zendaya has been teased as the next big star, Challengers will be the first real test of that after she's mostly played supporting parts in established IP and being the co-lead in a failed late-season awards play with Malcolm & Marie. I expect Challengers to do solid business, but it remains to be seen her impact as a draw for movies as of yet. Hahaha! Glad somebody got the "tits up" line. Was starting to wonder if I'd been too subtle . Sweeney is in a strong position. Like I can't think of another actress her age in recent years who carried an original star vehicle to such box office success, which Anyone But You is. She'll get a lot of the credit, along with Powell.
I think Madame Web is probably going to bomb, but Sweeney just has a supporting role and it's Dakota Johnson whose face is all over the marketing, so I don't think however that film does will say much about her burgeoning starpower. The horror film might say something. I also don't think Sweeney needs to do much in terms of acting credibility. She's already a 2 time Emmy nominated actress for two different roles ( Euphoria and The White Lotus). She may have the sexy image thing going on, but in the industry, she's taken seriously as an actress. She'll get the opportunity for prestige or oscarbaity roles if she wants them. Yeah, I also agree that Zendaya has not really been tested as a box office draw. She does well in supporting parts in established IPs, and has success on streaming and television, but she could use an original star vehicle at the box office doing well to really cement her. Challengers feels more like an indie/speciality film, so I'm not sure that's going to be the one. But yeah, a studio rom-com or horror or something....she should be carrying at this point.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Feb 5, 2024 14:45:19 GMT
The combo of Dune: Part 2 and Challengers will make for a great year for Zendaya both commercially and likely critically. Will be interested to see what projects she takes from here (outside of Dune 3, Spider-man 4, and one more season of Euphoria).
|
|
|
Post by countjohn on Feb 6, 2024 4:48:45 GMT
Sweeney's got a long way to go here. I'm not really going to give her or Powell "credit" for the commercial success of Anyone But You when it opened to 6 mil. It's a total sleeper hit that's done as well as it has due to audiences liking the movie and seeing it multiple times and it being the January-February dead zone where there's not a lot of competition. Euphoria can get all the online buzz it wants but it only has like 500k viewers. Anyone But You is the first a lot of people in the real world are even hearing of Sweeney. We'll see how her horror movie does and if she can build off that but she's a long way away from competing with Stone or Robbie.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 6, 2024 6:09:00 GMT
Sweeney's got a long way to go here. I'm not really going to give her or Powell "credit" for the commercial success of Anyone But You when it opened to 6 mil. It's a total sleeper hit that's done as well as it has due to audiences liking the movie and seeing it multiple times and it being the January-February dead zone where there's not a lot of competition. Euphoria can get all the online buzz it wants but it only has like 500k viewers. Anyone But You is the first a lot of people in the real world are even hearing of Sweeney. We'll see how her horror movie does and if she can build off that but she's a long way away from competing with Stone or Robbie. How do you suppose stars become stars? Audiences have to find them. That's exactly what happened with Sweeney and Powell in Anyone But You. It's a "sleeper hit" because of them. Their combination of chemistry/looks/charisma/whatever obviously charmed audiences enough to make it a word of mouth hit. Audiences liked it and told their friends to go see it because they got charmed by Sweeney and .Powell. If those audiences didn't know her before, they know her now. Rom-Coms, more than almost any other genre, tend to live and die on the on the appeal of their leads. That's why almost any romantic comedy that does well ( especially one not based on a well known IP) the stars tend to get the lion's share of the credit if it works. Doesn't matter whether it opened small and became a word of mouth hit. That's still a credit to the leads working. So I do give credit to Sweeney and Powell. But even if I didn't, the industry 100% will, and it will open up all sorts of opportunities for both of them. Does the success of Anyone But You make Sweeney or Powell guaranteed box office draws? Of course not. They still both need to be tested. But it'll give studios more faith in them to put them in vehicles to test whether they can draw audiences like that again. That is how building star power and box office appeal works. And honestly, Sweeney' s early trajectory feels a little more impressive than Margot Robbie's, whose box office success has been almost entirely based on working with bigger and more established stars ( Will Smith, Leonardo DiCaprio etc) and established, popular. branded IP's ( Harley Quinn, Barbie etc). Robbie is well liked, and a fine actress. And an excellent producer. But in terms of pure box office starpower, she's actually never really been tested at all. But that's how "stars" often get made in this era. It's not like Robbie is peak Julia Roberts , who was drawing audiences into films on her name alone. So I actually don't think it'd neccesarily be as difficult for someone like Sweeney to be competitive with Robbie for opportunities much sooner than you might think. As long as she and her team make smart moves. Shit, Sweeney easily could do what Robbie does and commandeer already popular IP's. I expect studios will want her to. I can see Sweeney being cast as She-Ra, or something silly like that.
|
|
|
Post by urbanpatrician on Feb 6, 2024 7:05:31 GMT
How can you figure someone doesn't know Sydney Sweeney before Anyone But You?
Yeah..... I guess she's more popular on the internet than irl, but you act like the internet is a small place. It's not exactly.
Euphoria is not a ratings juggernaut, but it is a premium teen show on HBO - a stand out one at that. The reason it's not a ratings juggernaut is because not enough adults watch it. Just like adults didn't watch Dawson's Creek, but that doesn't prevent it from being the adolescent staple of every teen or pre-teen that grew up from the late 90s/early 00s.
Even if women won't enjoy looking at her breasts like men do, they...... admire her beauty. So I think she's definitely much more known than you think. Is she Nicole Kidman or Julia Roberts? No - and I suppose you can argue that she's more of a teen/20s things than a 30s/40s thing. But then so is.... Zendaya, Margot Robbie, Emma Stone, Jennifer Lawrence and pretty much anyone you can name that came around after Julia Roberts and Nicole Kidman.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Feb 6, 2024 8:52:14 GMT
This board sucks at this shit - Emma Stone has 2 votes but Emma Stone could have 2 Oscars at 35, has Lanthimos movies coming like crazy a high profile Aster anyway and just had a GOAT year with THe Curse which is better than she is in Poor Things and she's amazing in Poor Things I mean I get all these other actresses but we;re in 2024 already .... Sylvia Sweeney to me is the sexy girl in the car in the Rolling Stones video - I mean that's cool but and ......that's even after Anyone But You......for you youngsters out there The Rolling Stones were a popular Rock orchestra in the 1960s and.......oh nevermind......
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Feb 6, 2024 15:17:45 GMT
Sweeney's got a long way to go here. I'm not really going to give her or Powell "credit" for the commercial success of Anyone But You when it opened to 6 mil. It's a total sleeper hit that's done as well as it has due to audiences liking the movie and seeing it multiple times and it being the January-February dead zone where there's not a lot of competition. Euphoria can get all the online buzz it wants but it only has like 500k viewers. Anyone But You is the first a lot of people in the real world are even hearing of Sweeney. We'll see how her horror movie does and if she can build off that but she's a long way away from competing with Stone or Robbie. Where are you getting this figure? Are you just making it up? Euphoria averages like 16 million viewers an episode.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Feb 6, 2024 15:20:18 GMT
Euphoria is not a ratings juggernaut, but it is a premium teen show on HBO - a stand out one at that. The reason it's not a ratings juggernaut is because not enough adults watch it. Just like adults didn't watch Dawson's Creek, but that doesn't prevent it from being the adolescent staple of every teen or pre-teen that grew up from the late 90s/early 00s. Euphoria’s second season became HBO’s second most watched show after Game of Thrones
|
|
|
Post by stabcaesar on Feb 6, 2024 15:27:02 GMT
Lmao why are people comparing Sydney Sweeny with actual established super stars like Emma Stone and Margot Robbie
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 6, 2024 15:33:45 GMT
Lmao why are people comparing Sydney Sweeny with actual established super stars like Emma Stone and Margot Robbie I think we are more talking about Sweeney as the potential "next big one" as opposed to claiming she is already there. We already know Robbie and Stone are at the very top right now. Anya Taylor -Joy and Zendaya were hyped to be the ones that would take over when this poll was firsr created, but Zendaya needs to prove herself as a box office draw and ATJ has had a few missteps. Sweeney (who wasn't even a factor when the poll started) may be in a position to step up to the next level. That's all, imho.
|
|
|
Post by mikediastavrone96 on Feb 6, 2024 15:38:30 GMT
Sweeney's got a long way to go here. I'm not really going to give her or Powell "credit" for the commercial success of Anyone But You when it opened to 6 mil. It's a total sleeper hit that's done as well as it has due to audiences liking the movie and seeing it multiple times and it being the January-February dead zone where there's not a lot of competition. Euphoria can get all the online buzz it wants but it only has like 500k viewers. Anyone But You is the first a lot of people in the real world are even hearing of Sweeney. We'll see how her horror movie does and if she can build off that but she's a long way away from competing with Stone or Robbie. Where are you getting this figure? Are you just making it up? Euphoria averages like 16 million viewers an episode. The 500k figure is the series premiere on HBO. He seems to only care about how things open and not the audience they accrue over time.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Feb 6, 2024 16:37:38 GMT
Lmao why are people comparing Sydney Sweeny with actual established super stars like Emma Stone and Margot Robbie Exactly - this would have been a bold pick BEFORE her hit rom-com - the decade is 40% done ffs.......
|
|
|
Post by stabcaesar on Feb 6, 2024 17:10:10 GMT
the decade is 40% done ffs....... [ Which is just tragic. The past 4 years have been horrendous for the world to say the least.
|
|
|
Post by Mattsby on Feb 6, 2024 17:22:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by urbanpatrician on Feb 6, 2024 19:40:55 GMT
Euphoria is not a ratings juggernaut, but it is a premium teen show on HBO - a stand out one at that. The reason it's not a ratings juggernaut is because not enough adults watch it. Just like adults didn't watch Dawson's Creek, but that doesn't prevent it from being the adolescent staple of every teen or pre-teen that grew up from the late 90s/early 00s. Euphoria’s second season became HBO’s second most watched show after Game of Thrones Uh..... I didn't know that. I don't know anything about ratings or figures. I just took countjohn's word for it. Maybe that's not a good idea, as the dude just said not shortly ago that Lebron could've been on Jordan's last team as a rookie, despite the fact that Jordan was already retired. I'll fact check him next time he says something. For the record..... my argument is that it's hard to imagine anyone not knowing who Sydney Sweeney is, unless you're just 30+ years of age or something, married with kids and you're out of touch with society, and living in the late 90s or early 00s. But even then, that doesn't apply to every one of those guys. And yes, I do think it's possible that Sweeney could definitely overtake Stone or Robbie as a box office supremacist. I don't think the other 2 are really that either without a great project to assist them.
|
|
|
Post by countjohn on Feb 6, 2024 20:54:21 GMT
Sweeney's got a long way to go here. I'm not really going to give her or Powell "credit" for the commercial success of Anyone But You when it opened to 6 mil. It's a total sleeper hit that's done as well as it has due to audiences liking the movie and seeing it multiple times and it being the January-February dead zone where there's not a lot of competition. Euphoria can get all the online buzz it wants but it only has like 500k viewers. Anyone But You is the first a lot of people in the real world are even hearing of Sweeney. We'll see how her horror movie does and if she can build off that but she's a long way away from competing with Stone or Robbie. Where are you getting this figure? Are you just making it up? Euphoria averages like 16 million viewers an episode. Googled it out of curiosity and that's what came up although as another person noted that may just be the initial broadcast and not the total number of people watching.
|
|
|
Post by urbanpatrician on Feb 7, 2024 0:29:50 GMT
I find Sydney more interesting, and definitely better to look at than Emma. I don't get the shade thrown here.
If you wanna be shady, I can do the same. Only people who likes Oscar movies dig Emma Stone to the extent that they do. Which is like.... what? 1% of America?
The White Lotus > The Favorite. Euphoria > La La Land.
|
|
|
Post by futuretrunks on Feb 7, 2024 1:02:59 GMT
I don't quite get Sweeney yet. She works well on Euphoria and that season of The White Lotus, but has this watchful halting quality to her approach (even in that Reality HBO movie) that doesn't mesh well IMO with a wide range of roles. She should consider wildly altering her vocal cadences and general affect sometimes. It's almost like if Aubrey Plaza wasn't funny or something.
|
|
paulgallo
Junior Member
Posts: 269
Likes: 171
Member is Online
|
Post by paulgallo on Feb 11, 2024 19:17:21 GMT
Not only is Poor Things a showcase for Emma Stone's acting talent, the film also made 80M at the box office so far, more than doubling its production budget and becoming the second highest grossing platform release since the pandemic behind EEAAO. Getting an R-rated film with such an off-putting premise by an unknown (to mainstream audiences) Greek auteur to such a result in the post-pandemic theater landscape is quite the achievement and testament for Emma's star power.
|
|