|
Post by pupdurcs on Jan 30, 2024 7:14:22 GMT
A shame Denzel was never Othello on film. Him doing it in his 90's prime with Branagh directing, playing Iago, and giving it his Henry V/Hamlet epic treatment could have been great stuff. There's a bunch of actors I'd rather see play Iago than those two but between the two of them I still much prefer Driver who is usually at least dependable. Gyllenhaal as Iago sounds like so much fail. I don't mind either Driver or Gyllenhaal as Iago. They both know what they are doing on stage ( as long as Driver stays away from Welsh or Irish accents )
|
|
|
Post by futuretrunks on Feb 15, 2024 4:56:53 GMT
Some Denzel stuff in the Zwick book:
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 15, 2024 5:10:37 GMT
Some Denzel stuff in the Zwick book: Yeah, Zwick loves Denzel. He also called him the living actor with the most brilliant career on his press tour for his book.
I've read that about Denzel before. That he never watches himself in dailies (unless it's a film he's also directing and acting in, in which case he has no choice). Antoine Fuqua mentioned that when discussing the making of Training Day. Fuqua asked if he wanted to see dailies of what he did on set and he just said no. The nonchalant confidence you must have in your talent to not even want to look at rushes of your performance to see what you might be getting wrong or right is insane. I feel like even Daniel Day-Lewis probably looks at dailies. Dude's a genius.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 28, 2024 5:05:29 GMT
Paul Giamatti calls the GOAT a genius, and says it's his dream to work with him, but doesn't think it'll ever happen. Dude almost sounds heartbroken. Spike Lee needs to get on the phone to Giamatti's agent and offer him a role in High And Low.
|
|
|
Post by SeanJoyce on Feb 29, 2024 3:30:05 GMT
Spike Lee needs to get on the phone to Giamatti's agent and offer him a role in High And Low.
Spike Lee needs to kick his own agent's ass for making High and Low.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 29, 2024 4:32:23 GMT
Spike Lee needs to get on the phone to Giamatti's agent and offer him a role in High And Low.
Spike Lee needs to kick his own agent's ass for making High and Low. Lee has long been known to be a Kurosawa nerd. Pretty sure this was his idea and had nothing to do with his agent. It's coming from a place of passion, which is what you want when you are a great director remaking something ( like Spielberg remaking West Side Story, because it meant something to his youth/childhood). Also, it's a black and white Japanese film from 1963. No matter how much it's respected by cinephiles, I doubt more than 1% of cinema audiences today have even seen the original. If you are going to remake something great, that's almost an ideal choice to go for because of that.
|
|
|
Post by SeanJoyce on Feb 29, 2024 5:11:54 GMT
It's coming from a place of passion, which is what you want when you are a great director remaking something I'm sure Old Boy was too, and that turned out so well.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 29, 2024 5:23:38 GMT
It's coming from a place of passion, which is what you want when you are a great director remaking something I'm sure Old Boy was too, and that turned out so well. OldBoy was clearly a rare paycheck gig for Lee, a director who has famously rarely done paycheck feature films ( he tends to saves the paycheck/money grab stuff for Nike ads). Lee didn't worship Park Chan-Wook, who is actually a younger contemporary of his. His agent probably brought him that project when he was behind on his mortgage payments Like I said, he is a Kurosawa nerd. He teaches Kurosawa in his University film classes. He's been talking about Kurosawa as a master and one of his inspirations in interviews for almost 40 years now. Big difference. I don't think Old Boy has anything to do with the potential outcome of High And Low. Again, knowing how much he loves Kurosawa, it's clearly closer to a passion project than a paycheck gig.
|
|
|
Post by SeanJoyce on Feb 29, 2024 5:57:09 GMT
OldBoy was clearly a rare paycheck gig for Lee, a director who has famously rarely done paycheck feature films ( he tends to saves the paycheck/money grab stuff for Nike ads). Lee didn't worship Park Chan-Wook, who is actually a younger contemporary of his. His agent probably brought him that project when he was behind on his mortgage payments Like I said, he is a Kurosawa nerd. He teaches Kurosawa in his University film classes. He's been talking about Kurosawa as a master and one of his inspirations in interviews for almost 40 years now. Big difference. I don't think Old Boy has anything to do with the potential outcome of High And Low. Again, knowing how much he loves Kurosawa, it's clearly closer to a passion project than a paycheck gig. Then he should make something original that homages the master, not saturate our cinemas with yet another pointless remake nobody asked for. With The Manchurian Candidate, The Magnificent 7, The Taking of Pelham 1, 2, 3, Unstoppable and now this, Denzel has overtaken Mark Wahlberg as the "remake" poster boy. Yay for him I guess?
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 29, 2024 6:17:50 GMT
OldBoy was clearly a rare paycheck gig for Lee, a director who has famously rarely done paycheck feature films ( he tends to saves the paycheck/money grab stuff for Nike ads). Lee didn't worship Park Chan-Wook, who is actually a younger contemporary of his. His agent probably brought him that project when he was behind on his mortgage payments Like I said, he is a Kurosawa nerd. He teaches Kurosawa in his University film classes. He's been talking about Kurosawa as a master and one of his inspirations in interviews for almost 40 years now. Big difference. I don't think Old Boy has anything to do with the potential outcome of High And Low. Again, knowing how much he loves Kurosawa, it's clearly closer to a passion project than a paycheck gig. Then he should make something original that homages the master, not saturate our cinemas with yet another pointless remake nobody asked for. With The Manchurian Candidate, The Magnificent 7, The Taking of Pelham 1, 2, 3, Unstoppable and now this, Denzel has overtaken Mark Wahlberg as the "remake" poster boy. Yay for him I guess? You forgot The Tragedy Of Macbeth, which was incredible. And Man On Fire, which is also incredible to me . So yeah, yay for him. I've got nothing against most remakes in principle. They will always be made. Do you know how many versions of Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde we've seen? Or The Three Musketeers? Should Francis Ford Coppola never have done Dracula, because there had already been 20 versions already made? He happened to make arguably the best one ( other than Werner Herzog's Nosferateu, which was also a remake). Just try be good. If you are dead set against remakes, don't watch 'em. Problem solved. But I find it silly to moan about a practice that's been embedded in the motion picture industry since it's inception. Frigging Ben-Hur is a remake. A lot of your favorite films are remakes and you probably don't even realise it. Do we miss out on Cronenbergs The Fly, or De Palmas Scarface or Michael Mann's Heat or Christopher Nolan' s Insomnia or William Friedkin's Sorcerer or Sergio Leone's A Fistful Of Dollars because of some childish and unrealistic belief that "remakes" are artistically impure? Nah, no thanks.
|
|
|
Post by SeanJoyce on Feb 29, 2024 6:31:19 GMT
A lot of your favorite films are remakes and you probably don't even realise it. I know my movies enough to know which (few) I enjoy are remakes, thank you very much Can't wait for this to be as cinematically filling as Safe House (which we know you think is a fine addition to a GOAT resume.)
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 29, 2024 6:32:19 GMT
A lot of your favorite films are remakes and you probably don't even realise it. I know my movies enough to know which (few) I enjoy are remakes, thank you very much Can't wait for this to be as cinematically filling as Safe House. Quite. Then don't watch it. Problem solved.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Mar 6, 2024 16:49:04 GMT
The GOAT and Jake Gyllenhaal to star in Othello next year on Broadway. To be directed by Tony winning director Kenny Leon.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Mar 6, 2024 18:10:54 GMT
The official poster for Othello ( might change closer to production though)
|
|
|
Post by franklin on Mar 6, 2024 22:42:53 GMT
I'm ready to bet that if this production is successful, Washington will try to do a film adaptation with the same actors, just like he did with Fences.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Mar 6, 2024 23:01:51 GMT
I'm ready to bet that if this production is successful, Washington will try to do a film adaptation with the same actors, just like he did with Fences. Not necessarily. In fact I doubt he will. A Raisin In The Sun won the Tony for Best Revival of a Play, and he never tried to mount a film version. The Iceman Cometh got a slew of Tony nominations, including Best Actor In A Play for Denzel, and he showed no interest in doing a film version. Fences was different, because Denzel secured the rights from August Wilson's estate to turn all his plays into films. It's a legacy project for Denzel, to make sure all of Wilson's plays have screen versions for people to appreciate Wilson on a wider scale. In general though, Denzel just seems to see plays he acts in as plays, not testing grounds or dry runs for a movie version of the play. Fences was the exception so far, because of the Wilson legacy project.
|
|
sirchuck23
Based
Bad news dawg...you don't mind if I have some of your 300 dollar a glass shit there would ya?
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 4,834
|
Post by sirchuck23 on Mar 13, 2024 18:42:15 GMT
Nathaniel Rogers of The Film Experience blog which covers movie news and awards seasons, does this Oscar Actor Hierarchy every few years where actors are listed based on the number of acting Oscar nominations and wins they have in their career with AMPAS. He lists them into different tiers playing on a Royal theme. He updated it yesterday and thought it was cool that because of his nomination for The Tragedy of MacBeth, Denzel moved into the highest tier which is "Oscars Five Kings". Fittingly he entered that top echelon for playing a King, so it fits. Very nice article/visual of how the top 35 Oscar nominated/winning actors of all time stack up along with potential actors who can enter the top 35 list. thefilmexperience.net/blog/2024/3/12/oscar-actor-hierarchy-2024-edition.htmlOSCAR'S FIVE KINGS And 30 other Royals01 Jack Nicholson 12 noms | 3 wins 02 Laurence Olivier † 10 Noms | 1 win | 2 honoraries 03 Paul Newman † 9 noms | 1 win | 2 honoraries 04 Spencer Tracy † 9 noms | 2 wins 05 🔺 Denzel Washington 9 noms | 2 wins THE PRINCES 06 Al Pacino 9 noms | 1 win 07 Marlon Brando † 8 noms | 2 wins 08 🔺 Robert De Niro 8 noms | 2 wins 09 Jack Lemmon † 8 noms | 2 wins 10 Peter O'Toole † 8 noms | 0 wins | honorary 11 Dustin Hoffman 7 noms | 2 wins 12 Daniel Day-Lewis 6 noms | 3 wins DUKES13 Jeff Bridges 7 noms | 1 win 14 Robert Duvall 7 noms | 1 win 15 Tom Hanks 6 noms | 2 wins 16 🔺 Anthony Hopkins 6 noms | 2 wins 17 Michael Caine 6 noms | 2 wins 18 Richard Burton † 7 noms | 0 wins 19 Leonardo DiCaprio 6 noms | 1 win 20 Gary Cooper † 5 noms | 2 wins | honorary 21 James Stewart † 5 noms | 1 win | honorary 22 Gregory Peck † 5 noms | 1 win | honorary COUNTS, KNIGHTS, AND BARONS23 Fredric March † 5 noms | 2 wins 24 Sean Penn 5 noms | 2 wins 25 Gene Hackman 5 noms | 2 wins 26 Paul Muni † 5 noms | 1 win 27 Morgan Freeman 5 noms | 1 win 28 Walter Brennan † 4 noms | 3 wins 29 Alec Guiness † 4 noms | 1 win | honorary 30 Charles Boyer † 4 noms | 0 wins | honorary 31 Anthony Quinn † 4 noms | 2 wins 31 🔺 Bradley Cooper 5 noms | 0 wins 32 Albert Finney † 5 noms | 0 wins 33 Arthur Kennedy † 5 noms | 0 wins 34 Warren Beatty 4 noms | 0 wins | honorary
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Mar 13, 2024 19:01:20 GMT
Nathaniel Rogers of The Film Experience blog which covers movie news and awards seasons, does this Oscar Actor Hierarchy every few years where actors are listed based on the number of Oscar nominations and wins they have in their career with AMPAS. He lists them into different tiers playing on a Royal theme. He updated it yesterday and thought it was cool that because of his nomination for The Tragedy of MacBeth, Denzel moved into the highest tier which is "Oscars Five Kings". Fittingly he entered that top echelon for playing a King, so it fits. Very nice article/visual of how the top 35 Oscar nominated/winning actors of all time stack up along with potential actors who can enter the top 35 list. thefilmexperience.net/blog/2024/3/12/oscar-actor-hierarchy-2024-edition.htmlOSCAR'S FIVE KINGS And 30 other Royals01 Jack Nicholson 12 noms | 3 wins 02 Laurence Olivier † 10 Noms | 1 win | 2 honoraries 03 Paul Newman † 9 noms | 1 win | 2 honoraries 04 Spencer Tracy † 9 noms | 2 wins 05 🔺 Denzel Washington 9 noms | 2 wins THE PRINCES 06 Al Pacino 9 noms | 1 win 07 Marlon Brando † 8 noms | 2 wins 08 🔺 Robert De Niro 8 noms | 2 wins 09 Jack Lemmon † 8 noms | 2 wins 10 Peter O'Toole † 8 noms | 0 wins | honorary 11 Dustin Hoffman 7 noms | 2 wins 12 Daniel Day-Lewis 6 noms | 3 wins DUKES13 Jeff Bridges 7 noms | 1 win 14 Robert Duvall 7 noms | 1 win 15 Tom Hanks 6 noms | 2 wins 16 🔺 Anthony Hopkins 6 noms | 2 wins 17 Michael Caine 6 noms | 2 wins 18 Richard Burton † 7 noms | 0 wins 19 Leonardo DiCaprio 6 noms | 1 win 20 Gary Cooper † 5 noms | 2 wins | honorary 21 James Stewart † 5 noms | 1 win | honorary 22 Gregory Peck † 5 noms | 1 win | honorary COUNTS, KNIGHTS, AND BARONS23 Fredric March † 5 noms | 2 wins 24 Sean Penn 5 noms | 2 wins 25 Gene Hackman 5 noms | 2 wins 26 Paul Muni † 5 noms | 1 win 27 Morgan Freeman 5 noms | 1 win 28 Walter Brennan † 4 noms | 3 wins 29 Alec Guiness † 4 noms | 1 win | honorary 30 Charles Boyer † 4 noms | 0 wins | honorary 31 Anthony Quinn † 4 noms | 2 wins 31 🔺 Bradley Cooper 5 noms | 0 wins 32 Albert Finney † 5 noms | 0 wins 33 Arthur Kennedy † 5 noms | 0 wins 34 Warren Beatty 4 noms | 0 wins | honorary I've actually been looking at Nathaniel Rogers updates of this list for years now, and it's crazy to see Denzel finally enter the Oscar Kings category. Nathaniel is so consistent in updating this list, so big congratulations to him for his professionalism. I remember seeing the list in 2016, when Denzel was still a Duke.thefilmexperience.net/blog/2016/3/2/the-new-actor-hierarchy-oscars-most-beloved-male-stars.html8 years later, he's a King. Making a steady climb to to very top of the mountain ( which is Nicholson) . I believe he'll get there, but it's been a fascinating journey for the GOAT. I'm proud to have been a believer when there were so many doubters
|
|
sirchuck23
Based
Bad news dawg...you don't mind if I have some of your 300 dollar a glass shit there would ya?
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 4,834
|
Post by sirchuck23 on Mar 13, 2024 19:08:05 GMT
Nathaniel Rogers of The Film Experience blog which covers movie news and awards seasons, does this Oscar Actor Hierarchy every few years where actors are listed based on the number of Oscar nominations and wins they have in their career with AMPAS. He lists them into different tiers playing on a Royal theme. He updated it yesterday and thought it was cool that because of his nomination for The Tragedy of MacBeth, Denzel moved into the highest tier which is "Oscars Five Kings". Fittingly he entered that top echelon for playing a King, so it fits. Very nice article/visual of how the top 35 Oscar nominated/winning actors of all time stack up along with potential actors who can enter the top 35 list. thefilmexperience.net/blog/2024/3/12/oscar-actor-hierarchy-2024-edition.htmlOSCAR'S FIVE KINGS And 30 other Royals01 Jack Nicholson 12 noms | 3 wins 02 Laurence Olivier † 10 Noms | 1 win | 2 honoraries 03 Paul Newman † 9 noms | 1 win | 2 honoraries 04 Spencer Tracy † 9 noms | 2 wins 05 🔺 Denzel Washington 9 noms | 2 wins THE PRINCES 06 Al Pacino 9 noms | 1 win 07 Marlon Brando † 8 noms | 2 wins 08 🔺 Robert De Niro 8 noms | 2 wins 09 Jack Lemmon † 8 noms | 2 wins 10 Peter O'Toole † 8 noms | 0 wins | honorary 11 Dustin Hoffman 7 noms | 2 wins 12 Daniel Day-Lewis 6 noms | 3 wins DUKES13 Jeff Bridges 7 noms | 1 win 14 Robert Duvall 7 noms | 1 win 15 Tom Hanks 6 noms | 2 wins 16 🔺 Anthony Hopkins 6 noms | 2 wins 17 Michael Caine 6 noms | 2 wins 18 Richard Burton † 7 noms | 0 wins 19 Leonardo DiCaprio 6 noms | 1 win 20 Gary Cooper † 5 noms | 2 wins | honorary 21 James Stewart † 5 noms | 1 win | honorary 22 Gregory Peck † 5 noms | 1 win | honorary COUNTS, KNIGHTS, AND BARONS23 Fredric March † 5 noms | 2 wins 24 Sean Penn 5 noms | 2 wins 25 Gene Hackman 5 noms | 2 wins 26 Paul Muni † 5 noms | 1 win 27 Morgan Freeman 5 noms | 1 win 28 Walter Brennan † 4 noms | 3 wins 29 Alec Guiness † 4 noms | 1 win | honorary 30 Charles Boyer † 4 noms | 0 wins | honorary 31 Anthony Quinn † 4 noms | 2 wins 31 🔺 Bradley Cooper 5 noms | 0 wins 32 Albert Finney † 5 noms | 0 wins 33 Arthur Kennedy † 5 noms | 0 wins 34 Warren Beatty 4 noms | 0 wins | honorary I've actually been looking at Nathaniel Rogers updates of this list for years now, and it's crazy to see Denzel finally enter the Oscar Kings category. Nathaniel is so consistent in updating this list, so big congratulations to him for his professionalism. I remember seeing the list in 2016, when Denzel was still a Duke.thefilmexperience.net/blog/2016/3/2/the-new-actor-hierarchy-oscars-most-beloved-male-stars.html8 years later, he's a King. Making a steady climb to to very top of the mountain ( which is Nicholson) . I believe he'll get there, but it's been a fascinating journey for the GOAT. I'm proud to have been a believer when there were so many doubters Yeah I remember that, when he was in the Duke tier. Shows how much ground he's gained since that time, and can potentially gain more ground this year. So cool that he's reached that pinnacle. And yes I'm proud to have been a Denzel stan since he won for Training Day in 2001. Can see another Oscar and Tony nom pretty soon for him!
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Mar 13, 2024 19:43:13 GMT
I've actually been looking at Nathaniel Rogers updates of this list for years now, and it's crazy to see Denzel finally enter the Oscar Kings category. Nathaniel is so consistent in updating this list, so big congratulations to him for his professionalism. I remember seeing the list in 2016, when Denzel was still a Duke.thefilmexperience.net/blog/2016/3/2/the-new-actor-hierarchy-oscars-most-beloved-male-stars.html8 years later, he's a King. Making a steady climb to to very top of the mountain ( which is Nicholson) . I believe he'll get there, but it's been a fascinating journey for the GOAT. I'm proud to have been a believer when there were so many doubters Yeah I remember that, when he was in the Duke tier. Shows how much ground he's gained since that time, and can potentially gain more ground this year. So cool that he's reached that pinnacle. And yes I'm proud to have been a Denzel stan since he won for Training Day in 2001. Can see another Oscar and Tony nom pretty soon for him! This.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Apr 1, 2024 21:29:17 GMT
People don't really think tend to think of Denzel as a "technician" or a "voice" guy, but his eerily accurate impersonation of Jay-Z here, is a reminder that is in his arsenal as well. It's just plain funny too
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Apr 10, 2024 0:13:21 GMT
The life cycle of Denzel films needs to be studied. Three years after debuting to weak reviews and fairly tepid pandemic era box office, then going quickly to HBO Max and seemingly being forgotten, The Little Things is now the #1 movie on Netflix. Jared Leto took notice of the film having a second wind and finding a new audience, and is tweeting about it again.
|
|
sirchuck23
Based
Bad news dawg...you don't mind if I have some of your 300 dollar a glass shit there would ya?
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 4,834
|
Post by sirchuck23 on Apr 10, 2024 3:00:44 GMT
The life cycle of Denzel films needs to be studied. Three years after debuting to weak reviews and fairly tepid pandemic era box office, then going quickly to HBO Max and seemingly being forgotten , The Little Things is now the # 1 movie on Netflix. Jared Leto took notice of the film having a second wind and finding a new audience, and is tweeting about it again.
|
|
sirchuck23
Based
Bad news dawg...you don't mind if I have some of your 300 dollar a glass shit there would ya?
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 4,834
|
Post by sirchuck23 on Apr 23, 2024 19:55:45 GMT
Guess I'll post this in this thread. Inverse did an interview with Oscar winning screenwriter/filmmaker Brian Helgeland (L.A. Confidential, A Knight's Tale, Mystic River, 42) for Man on Fire's 20th anniversary along with some of his other work. Great interview on working with Denzel on Man on Fire, but I thought the most interesting quote from him in this interview were his thoughts on Tony and Ridley Scott since he collaborated with both of them on projects: Every few months, I think about the landscape of cinema and how much Tony Scott is missed as a director. What did you learn from working with him so closely?
He was the hardest-working and most committed director I’ve ever worked with. In the morning, he’d stand up on a platform and talk to the whole crew. He was like a general leading an army into battle, running through what the crew were doing for the day. Tony always talked about process, but he’d simply say, “I make movies about what people do for a living. That’s all I do.” He described Top Gun to me as a movie that’s just about showing audiences what fighter pilots do for a living! His levels of passion, dedication and commitment were on another level. When he finished Man on Fire, there was no stone left unturned. Ridley [Scott] is an incredible filmmaker, too, but Tony is the better director because he truly understands human emotion. I’m allowed to say that after working with both of them. Sorry, Ridley! Thought that was interesting opinion of him. Of course history is going to look back at Ridley as the great filmmaker of the brothers, but its interesting to see a reexamination of Tony Scott's filmmaking legacy from prominent artists in the industry like Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, and now Brian Helgeland. Link to the full interview: www.inverse.com/entertainment/man-on-fire-anniversary-20-years-interview-brian-helgeland-knights-tale-sequel
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Apr 23, 2024 20:04:05 GMT
Guess I'll post this in this thread. Inverse did an interview with Oscar winning screenwriter/filmmaker Brian Helgeland (L.A. Confidential, A Knight's Tale, Mystic River, 42) for Man on Fire's 20th anniversary along with some of his other work. Great interview on working with Denzel on Man on Fire, but I thought the most interesting quote from him in this interview were his thoughts on Tony and Ridley Scott since he collaborated with both of them on projects: Every few months, I think about the landscape of cinema and how much Tony Scott is missed as a director. What did you learn from working with him so closely?
He was the hardest-working and most committed director I’ve ever worked with. In the morning, he’d stand up on a platform and talk to the whole crew. He was like a general leading an army into battle, running through what the crew were doing for the day. Tony always talked about process, but he’d simply say, “I make movies about what people do for a living. That’s all I do.” He described Top Gun to me as a movie that’s just about showing audiences what fighter pilots do for a living! His levels of passion, dedication and commitment were on another level. When he finished Man on Fire, there was no stone left unturned. Ridley [Scott] is an incredible filmmaker, too, but Tony is the better director because he truly understands human emotion. I’m allowed to say that after working with both of them. Sorry, Ridley! Thought that was interesting opinion of him. Of course history is going to look back at Ridley as the great filmmaker of the brothers, but its interesting to see a reexamination of Tony Scott's filmmaking legacy from prominent artists in the industry like Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, and now Brian Helgeland. Link to the full interview: www.inverse.com/entertainment/man-on-fire-anniversary-20-years-interview-brian-helgeland-knights-tale-sequelGreat interview with Brian Helgeland. Yeah, it really nice that Tony Scott's legacy has been strengthened as much as it has. Shame he didn't live to see how much respectability he now has. There was a video doing the rounds on social media a few days ago with Tony saying he'd never be looked at for an Oscar.
|
|