|
Post by madmonsterparty on Jul 16, 2018 22:01:05 GMT
I actually kind of remember this year first hand. I don’t believe it was ever favored to win Best Picture because LOTR was too big that year, but it otherwise held its own pretty well. To be fair it still got 7 Oscar nominations which isn’t bad, but still. But does anyone else remember? Thanks for any comments or opinions in advance!!!!
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Jul 16, 2018 22:06:28 GMT
I remember people being a little bit shocked because of how goddamn baity it was and the fact that it was Weinstein, but I also seem to recall a bit of backlash towards Weinstein's bullish campaigning (on the heels of his ultra-aggressive campaign for Gangs of New York that seemed to leave a sour taste in voters' mouths). If memory serves, Mystic River got the late surge and Cold Mountain was always on the fringe, and it probably missed out due to passion voting and a general apathy towards its perceived super-baitiness. Shame, really; I actually enjoyed the movie for what it was and I definitely prefer it over Mystic River, Seabiscuit and Lost in Translation.
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jul 16, 2018 23:02:35 GMT
I was practically a baby back then, so idk. I didn't start caring about the Oscars and movie stuff in general until 2008. I'm not crazy about the film but looking back, it definitely would have made a better nominee than Mystic River and Seabiscuit 2003 was a weak year in general though, and the Oscars definitely reflected that.
|
|
|
Post by madmonsterparty on Jul 16, 2018 23:12:55 GMT
I remember people being a little bit shocked because of how goddamn baity it was and the fact that it was Weinstein, but I also seem to recall a bit of backlash towards Weinstein's bullish campaigning (on the heels of his ultra-aggressive campaign for Gangs of New York that seemed to leave a sour taste in voters' mouths). If memory serves, Mystic River got the late surge and Cold Mountain was always on the fringe, and it probably missed out due to passion voting and a general apathy towards its perceived super-baitiness. Shame, really; I actually enjoyed the movie for what it was and I definitely prefer it over Mystic River, Seabiscuit and Lost in Translation. Yeah, that’s a good point about Miramax. I remember thinking at the time that it was really bad timing after Gangs of New York, Chicago Etc.
|
|
|
Post by madmonsterparty on Jul 16, 2018 23:19:55 GMT
I was practically a baby back then, so idk. I didn't start caring about the Oscars and movie stuff in general until 2008. I'm not crazy about the film but looking back, it definitely would have made a better nominee than Mystic River and Seabiscuit 2003 was a weak year in general though, and the Oscars definitely reflected that. Yeah, the Seabiscuit nomination surprised people in the opposite direction. If I remember correctly it might have been the one that benefited the most because it was able to sneak in at the last minute.
|
|
|
Post by urbanpatrician on Jul 16, 2018 23:42:00 GMT
Not really. It had a chance. That's about all.
Lost in Translation might have not made it. It was the talk of the year, but the argument was that it wouldn't make enough ballots, and the critics and the stand-out favorite of the year tag that it had on it was what was giving it a chance to get nominated. It had a great chance no doubt, but it wasn't locked.
Master and Commander looked... good, but then there was also The Last Samurai which had a slight chance. And Master and Commander had to separate itself against Cold Mountain and The Last Samurai. 3 epics which all had a great chance before the year began.
Seabiscuit nomination actually surprised some too. It was a good sentimental story, and the talks in the media was about the sentiment and the good sounding nature of the hapless horse becoming a champion - which is comparable to a feel-good sports story. Not really much else was talked about it apart from the true-story aspect of it. It had a chance, but probably the least chances among the 5 nominees.
It was like this. At a certain point (LOTR and Cold Mountain were not released yet in October or November 2003), people became convinced it was LOTR - Master and Commander - Mystic River - Cold Mountain. Who's #5? People kept arguing Lost in Translation wasn't awards bait enough. And Seabiscuit would get pushed to the back once those December releases starts getting shown.
But then it turned out.....Cold Mountain really disappointed people. The Last Samurai too. Not one person posting on IMDB back then preferred those two to Mystic River and Lost in Translation. Mystic River doesn't have a strong status today, but back in 2003... LIT and Mystic River were There Will Be Blood and No Country for Old Men. Not that people thought Mystic River was going to be a classic or anything, but people were either team-LIT or team-Mystic River. While it seemed like there were an even amount of lovers of both at first, there will be all these new users who invade a few months later, and all of those new users usually seemed to prefer Lost in Translation. LOTR had not been released yet, but even after its release, lots of Lost in Translation fanboys looked down on it.
So in short, I think Seabiscuit made it in barely over Cold Mountain. Seabiscuit surprised people because the reviews were better than expected for a movie nobody cared if it sucked. Cold Mountain disappointed people because people wanted to it be very good. It was definitely everyone's prediction to win Best Picture before the year began. But then, it's definitely possible that Cold Mountain and Seabiscuit both make it, and Lost in Translation would've been left out.
|
|
|
Post by Sharbs on Jul 17, 2018 0:19:06 GMT
My biggest takeaway from this thread is that the IMDb message boards existed in '03. That feels crazy to me
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Jul 17, 2018 0:23:03 GMT
Not really. It had a chance. That's about all. Lost in Translation might have not made it. It was the talk of the year, but the argument was that it wouldn't make enough ballots, and the critics and the stand-out favorite of the year tag that it had on it was what was giving it a chance to get nominated. It had a great chance no doubt, but it wasn't locked. Master and Commander looked... good, but then there was also The Last Samurai which had a slight chance. And Master and Commander had to separate itself against Cold Mountain and The Last Samurai. 3 epics which all had a great chance before the year began. Seabiscuit nomination actually surprised some too. It was a good sentimental story, and the talks in the media was about the sentiment and the good sounding nature of the hapless horse becoming a champion - which is comparable to a feel-good sports story. Not really much else was talked about it apart from the true-story aspect of it. It had a chance, but probably the least chances among the 5 nominees. It was like this. At a certain point (LOTR and Cold Mountain were not released yet in October or November 2003), people became convinced it was LOTR - Master and Commander - Mystic River - Cold Mountain. Who's #5? People kept arguing Lost in Translation wasn't awards bait enough. And Seabiscuit would get pushed to the back once those December releases starts getting shown. But then it turned out.....Cold Mountain really disappointed people. The Last Samurai too. Not one person posting on IMDB back then preferred those two to Mystic River and Lost in Translation. Mystic River doesn't have a strong status today, but back in 2003... LIT and Mystic River were There Will Be Blood and No Country for Old Men. Not that people thought Mystic River was going to be a classic or anything, but people were either team-LIT or team-Mystic River. While it seemed like there were an even amount of lovers of both at first, there will be all these new users who invade a few months later, and all of those new users usually seemed to prefer Lost in Translation. LOTR had not been released yet, but even after its release, lots of Lost in Translation fanboys looked down on it. So in short, I think Seabiscuit made it in barely over Cold Mountain. Seabiscuit surprised people because the reviews were better than expected for a movie nobody cared if it sucked. Cold Mountain disappointed people because people wanted to it be very good. It was definitely everyone's prediction to win Best Picture before the year began. But then, it's definitely possible that Cold Mountain and Seabiscuit both make it, and Lost in Translation would've been left out. Actually, Seabiscuit was probably more secure than people think. It had a PGA nomination (which Mystic River didn't), it had a DGA nomination (which went 5/5 with the Academy's BP lineup), it had WGA (not the most essential precursor, but still), and it had SAG Ensemble, which neither Master and Commander nor Lost in Translation (or Cold Mountain, in fact) had. It's easy to dog the film now, but it's one of the only two BP nominees that year to hit all the necessary industry precursors.
|
|
|
Post by urbanpatrician on Jul 17, 2018 0:46:05 GMT
Not really. It had a chance. That's about all. Lost in Translation might have not made it. It was the talk of the year, but the argument was that it wouldn't make enough ballots, and the critics and the stand-out favorite of the year tag that it had on it was what was giving it a chance to get nominated. It had a great chance no doubt, but it wasn't locked. Master and Commander looked... good, but then there was also The Last Samurai which had a slight chance. And Master and Commander had to separate itself against Cold Mountain and The Last Samurai. 3 epics which all had a great chance before the year began. Seabiscuit nomination actually surprised some too. It was a good sentimental story, and the talks in the media was about the sentiment and the good sounding nature of the hapless horse becoming a champion - which is comparable to a feel-good sports story. Not really much else was talked about it apart from the true-story aspect of it. It had a chance, but probably the least chances among the 5 nominees. It was like this. At a certain point (LOTR and Cold Mountain were not released yet in October or November 2003), people became convinced it was LOTR - Master and Commander - Mystic River - Cold Mountain. Who's #5? People kept arguing Lost in Translation wasn't awards bait enough. And Seabiscuit would get pushed to the back once those December releases starts getting shown. But then it turned out.....Cold Mountain really disappointed people. The Last Samurai too. Not one person posting on IMDB back then preferred those two to Mystic River and Lost in Translation. Mystic River doesn't have a strong status today, but back in 2003... LIT and Mystic River were There Will Be Blood and No Country for Old Men. Not that people thought Mystic River was going to be a classic or anything, but people were either team-LIT or team-Mystic River. While it seemed like there were an even amount of lovers of both at first, there will be all these new users who invade a few months later, and all of those new users usually seemed to prefer Lost in Translation. LOTR had not been released yet, but even after its release, lots of Lost in Translation fanboys looked down on it. So in short, I think Seabiscuit made it in barely over Cold Mountain. Seabiscuit surprised people because the reviews were better than expected for a movie nobody cared if it sucked. Cold Mountain disappointed people because people wanted to it be very good. It was definitely everyone's prediction to win Best Picture before the year began. But then, it's definitely possible that Cold Mountain and Seabiscuit both make it, and Lost in Translation would've been left out. Actually, Seabiscuit was probably more secure than people think. It had a PGA nomination (which Mystic River didn't), it had a DGA nomination (which went 5/5 with the Academy's BP lineup), it had WGA (not the most essential precursor, but still), and it had SAG Ensemble, which neither Master and Commander nor Lost in Translation (or Cold Mountain, in fact) had. It's easy to dog the film now, but it's one of the only two BP nominees that year to hit all the necessary industry precursors. You have to take into account the timeline though. In October or November..... the precursors weren't all out yet. And people in those months were thinking Mystic River-LOTR-Cold Mountain-Master and Commander. Who's #5? Master and Commander was released Nov 14. At that time, I believe most people still thought Seabiscuit was beneath even the academy's tastes. I know it's cool to say it's an irrelevant movie now, but even back then lots of people had the same opinion... that it was just a random little movie that the Oscars could leave out. I'm speaking 100% free from my own opinion. By the time the precursors came around, it seemed a little more likely that it would get nominated. But there was still Cold Mountain (Dec 25th release) which most people predicted over Seabiscuit, so that left Seabiscuit on the outside looking in in most people's prediction ballots. (in the month of December) Of course when Cold Mountain was released - it was to decent, but highly disappointing reviews. So Cold Mountain at that point (probably January) was in danger of not being nominated, paving the way for Seabiscuit to have a stronger chance. I think it was most people's opinions that the top 3 (locks) were Mystic River-LOTR-Master and Commander by January. And Seabiscuit-LIT-Cold Mountain were the ones that were in the lower ranks of making it.
|
|
|
Post by countjohn on Jul 23, 2018 0:38:25 GMT
My biggest takeaway from this thread is that the IMDb message boards existed in '03. That feels crazy to me I think they started in like 98 or 99. I started posting in 08.
|
|
wonky
Full Member
Posts: 597
Likes: 714
|
Post by wonky on Jul 23, 2018 7:22:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wilcinema on Jul 23, 2018 11:17:13 GMT
I remember being very surprised because it was a period drama, it was Harvey, it was Minghella, it was Law-Zelwegger-Kidman. It had everything to be an Oscar contender.
|
|
|
Post by Brother Fease on Jul 30, 2018 11:10:07 GMT
I actually kind of remember this year first hand. I don’t believe it was ever favored to win Best Picture because LOTR was too big that year, but it otherwise held its own pretty well. To be fair it still got 7 Oscar nominations which isn’t bad, but still. But does anyone else remember? Thanks for any comments or opinions in advance!!!! The film was not a favorite to score one of the five best picture slots. STRONG FAVORITES Return of the King - PGA, DGA, and SAGE nominations. Nominated and won at the Globes, BAFTAs, and BFCA awards. Mystic River - PGA, DGA, and SAGE nominations. Scored Globe and BFCA best picture nominations. Only missed a BAFTA Best Picture nomination. Seabiscuit - PGA, DGA, and SAGE nominations. Scored Globe and BFCA best picture nominations. Only missed a BAFTA Best Picture nomination. Lost in Translation - PGA and DGA nominations. Won the Globe for Best Comed/Musical, and nominated at the BFCA and BAFTA awards. Master and Commander - PGA and DGA nominations. Scored Best Picture nominations at the Globes, BFCA, and BAFTAs. Cold Mountain was only a spoiler. It received only a PGA nomination and scored best picture nominations at the Globes, BAFTA, and BFCA awards. It received nominations for 4/6 major best picture awards. The others had at least 5/6. In America and Big Fish were the other wildcards out there.
|
|
|
Post by alexanderblanchett on Aug 11, 2018 12:29:00 GMT
Towards the end of the season not too surprising anymore, but it was the film that was predicted to WIN BP since January that year.
|
|