|
Post by pupdurcs on Jun 13, 2018 17:14:44 GMT
If you enjoy watching two screeching harpies for nearly 2 hours, more power to you. There's a reason Vardalos hasn't done much since that movie. And as I said in my last post, Nicole Kidman gave a SAG Best Actress nominated performance in GRACE OF MONACO. Kidman was actually the best thing about that movie. Don't get confused by the fact that Kidman's name becomes the focal point of all her "flop movies', with her actual performance. That's just tabloid bullshit you are buying into. Kidman gets SAG nominated performances for massive critical flops like The Paperboy and Grace Of Monaco. Because actual actors realise she's great even in trash movies. Sleep on that. She got nominated because it was a weak year ! (although I'm still shoked that they picked her over Kirsten Dunst !) They even nominated Susan Sarandon for that godawful Marilyn Monroe film . And please , her performance in laughable . Watching her trying to mimick the late Grace Kelly was as excruciating as watching her best pal Naomi Watts trying to become the late Princess Diana. Besides , the majority of critics panned her performance saying it was definitely not her "finest hour". I like Kidman but on Streep level , she is not ! At least , not yet .To each his own I guess . Watts got nominated for a Razzie. Kidman got nominated for a SAG. Perspective. I know you want Kidman's performance to be a failure of epic proportions, but the fact is ACTORS (her peers) respected her work in that movie. I don't think it's among her very best performance or anything, but considering the overall weakness of the script and direction, Kidman is clearly the best thing in it. And that acknowledgement from her fellow actors can't be denied, no matter how much you wish it so.
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Jun 13, 2018 17:22:26 GMT
She got nominated because it was a weak year ! (although I'm still shoked that they picked her over Kirsten Dunst !) They even nominated Susan Sarandon for that godawful Marilyn Monroe film . And please , her performance in laughable . Watching her trying to mimick the late Grace Kelly was as excruciating as watching her best pal Naomi Watts trying to become the late Princess Diana. Besides , the majority of critics panned her performance saying it was definitely not her "finest hour". I like Kidman but on Streep level , she is not ! At least , not yet .To each his own I guess . Watts got nominated for a Razzie. Kidman got nominated for a SAG. Perspective. I know you want Kidman's performance to be a failure of epic proportions, but the fact is ACTORS (her peers) respected her work in that movie. I don't think it's among her very best performance or anything, but considering the overall weakness of the script and direction, Kidman is clearly the best thing in it. And that acknowledgement from her fellow actors can't be denied, no matter how much you wish it so. Don't be silly now. You're taking it too personally. I think she's a terrific actress (her performance in TO DIE FOR is one of the greatest performances of all time!) but I also think that she's not as "untouchable" as some of her fans make her out to be. She hasn't always delievered remarkable performances . That's all.
|
|
wattsnew
Full Member
Posts: 712
Likes: 347
|
Post by wattsnew on Jun 14, 2018 19:42:46 GMT
Grace of Monaco premiered on LIFETIME. At least Diana was shown in theaters. Please stop trying to make anything about that movie look like a success, it's just embarrassing. Some people need to learn to own up to their faves flops. Actors make bad decisions, and that's okay! It's inevitable.
Anyway this thread got off track pretty damn quickly lol.
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on Jun 16, 2018 16:19:43 GMT
Cate Blanchett
|
|
|
Post by cheesecake on Jun 19, 2018 4:12:38 GMT
|
|