|
|
Post by Sharbs on Nov 14, 2017 16:36:14 GMT
Better Film? Phoenix or Ronan? Paltrow or Cohen? Shaw or Gleeson? Better Writing? Better Cinematography? Better final scene? ('Ellis gets fed up and leaves Ireland to go back to Tony' or 'Michelle tells Leonard that she's going back to her other lover and Leonard embraces Sandra') |
|
|
|
Post by Allenism on Nov 14, 2017 20:16:30 GMT
Two Lovers for all, and it ain’t close on most fronts.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Nov 14, 2017 20:19:41 GMT
Better Film: Two Lovers. It works much better as an overall piece.
Phoenix/Ronan: Ronan by far. Phoenix isn't bad by any means, but Saoirse is miraculous and is largely the reason her film manages not to collapse onto itself.
Paltrow/Cohen: Cohen. I didn't hate him in Place Beyond the Pines like most, but I never expected the effortless charm he exhibited here.
Shaw/Gleeson: Both are forgettable as hell, so tie.
Better Writing: Two Lovers, because Brooklyn has a laughably contrived second half.
Better Cinematography: I guess Brooklyn. I liked its color palette.
Better Final Scene: Yeah, Brooklyn.
|
|
|
|
Post by ingmarhepburn on Nov 17, 2017 1:25:05 GMT
Two Lovers for all. Brooklyn is a pretty average film.
|
|
|
|
Post by taranofprydain on Nov 17, 2017 1:46:59 GMT
Two wonderful films....
Brooklyn
Ronan
Paltrow
Gleeson
Brooklyn, one of the most pinpoint perfect scripts of the last 25 years, no question, and I'm not taking guff from anyone.
Brooklyn
Brooklyn
|
|
|
|
Post by cheesecake on Nov 17, 2017 2:13:41 GMT
Two Lovers for everything but Ronan for performance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Nov 17, 2017 4:18:18 GMT
I'll take the good one for everything.
That's Brooklyn, and I'm saddened to see that it's racing neck and neck with such an inferior piece.
|
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Nov 17, 2017 8:22:09 GMT
Brooklyn for just about everything.
|
|
oneflyr
Full Member
Posts: 566 
Likes: 256
|
Post by oneflyr on Nov 17, 2017 8:28:55 GMT
Two Lovers. Brooklyn blows
|
|
