|
|
Post by joboots007 on Feb 17, 2017 3:51:25 GMT
With all the awards & nominations Emma's gotten of late,U wonder if that could've been Lindsay's had she not crashed & burned so fast????
|
|
|
|
Post by mizzaphoenix on Feb 17, 2017 7:54:23 GMT
Doubtful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on Feb 17, 2017 8:17:53 GMT
I do think she showed definite signs of talent and had a nice screen presence, but while I think she could be having a solid career now, I don't think it would have been on the Stone level of current success.
|
|
|
|
Post by harlequinade on Feb 17, 2017 11:33:54 GMT
It's possible, I think she was better in Mean Girls than Emma in Easy A and that is what launched Stone's career and I think it was after MG that Lohan fell off the wagon into a dumpster
|
|
Schiggy
Full Member
Posts: 621 
Likes: 246
|
Post by Schiggy on Feb 17, 2017 19:56:35 GMT
No. She's not as pretty, friendly, or personable.
And her parents aren't "famous" for being morons.
Talent-wise, IDK, I haven't really seen enough of Lohan or Stone to compare them.
|
|
|
|
Post by akittystang on Feb 17, 2017 19:58:56 GMT
Am I the only one who never thought she was all that talented?
|
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Feb 17, 2017 21:44:07 GMT
No. She'd have to get really lucky, and even then she lacks the "talent" that Stone has. Plus her difficult behaviour would have eventually likely led to her downfall.
|
|
|
|
Post by mizzaphoenix on Feb 17, 2017 21:52:17 GMT
No. She'd have to get really lucky, and even then she lacks the "talent" that Stone has, and even then her difficult behavior would have still her downfall. Her family was also a liability and I'm sure they've contributed to the downward spiral her career took. |
|
|
|
Post by taranofprydain on Feb 17, 2017 22:10:09 GMT
Maybe, its hard to say. Her partying (and also her family) really destroyed her career, and its sad because she was very talented.
|
|
|
|
Post by ScarletDubois on Feb 17, 2017 23:27:35 GMT
I wouldn't say she's untalented, but I never really got hints of much more. Not like Stone is that gifted either, but she's more responsible with her talent, I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Feb 18, 2017 0:36:41 GMT
Lol at everything thinking Stone is way more talented than Lohan.
|
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Feb 18, 2017 5:00:16 GMT
No. She'd have to get really lucky, and even then she lacks the "talent" that Stone has, and even then her difficult behavior would have still her downfall. Her family was also a liability and I'm sure they've contributed to the downward spiral her career took. Her parents definitely played a big part in why she is the way she currently is. Like a lot of child stars, she had a pretty poor "childhood". |
|
|
|
Post by IceTruckDexter on Feb 18, 2017 23:18:33 GMT
Lol at everything thinking Stone is way more talented than Lohan. Yeah she's far more talented than Lohan. |
|
erickeitel
Junior Member
The beauty of life is in small details, not in big events.
Posts: 464
Likes: 383
|
Post by erickeitel on Feb 18, 2017 23:43:28 GMT
It's hard to say, because Lohan's career became defined by her personal life. One day, she's Meryl Streep's daughter; another day, she's filming The Canyons with James Deen.
|
|
|
|
Post by joboots007 on Feb 19, 2017 0:08:26 GMT
It's hard to say, because Lohan's career became defined by her personal life. One day, she's Meryl Streep's daughter; another day, she's filming The Canyons with James Deen. Or go from having Jane Fonda play her granny 2 playing Liz Taylor in Lifetime trash!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by futuretrunks on Feb 11, 2024 21:19:51 GMT
No, because it's not clear that Lohan loved acting (despite being good at it). She was profoundly unserious, and it has nothing to do with her partying and substance issues. Downey Jr. was a maniac but he always had a real interest in acting.
|
|
|
|
Post by countjohn on Feb 11, 2024 21:53:19 GMT
I think best case scenario if she kept it together she could have been the new rom com queen and revitalized the genre at the BO in the 2010's. Never saw signs of major dramatic acting talent from her, she was funny and had screen presence. So no, I don't think she'd be doing the kind of stuff Stone is now.
|
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Feb 11, 2024 22:01:19 GMT
I think best case scenario if she kept it together she could have been the new rom com queen and revitalized the genre at the BO in the 2010's. Never saw signs of major dramatic acting talent from her, she was funny and had screen presence. So no, I don't think she'd be doing the kind of stuff Stone is now. I dunno...I think if Lohan sought out auteurs in the same way Stone has or Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson did, she could have been pushed into major dramatic work.
We'll basically never know, but I personally believe Lohan had the raw, basic building blocks of acting talent to go in interesting directions with the right filmmakers. |
|
|
|
Post by MsMovieStar on Feb 13, 2024 7:58:12 GMT
Oh honey, no she's too undisciplined!
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Feb 13, 2024 13:29:31 GMT
Lol at everything thinking Stone is way more talented than Lohan. L take. But it’s also a testament to me on how much Stone has both grown as an actress and also greatly navigated her career. I truly used to not care for Stone as an actress as well but did a complete 180 after her Birdman/La La Land/Favourite run and have never really looked back. Few actors have ever made be do such a turnout on my opinion of them. |
|
|
|
Post by paulgallo on Feb 13, 2024 18:31:20 GMT
Sure. In the same universe where Macaulay Culkin has Ryan Gosling's career. I hear they starred together in La La Land directed by Josh Trank that won six Oscars.
|
|
