|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Jun 27, 2017 12:43:20 GMT
...
|
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Jun 28, 2017 12:55:14 GMT
It is not released yet, bitch Well , there are already people on this forum who have seen it moron  |
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Jun 30, 2017 8:59:30 GMT
Well , there are already people on this forum who have seen it moron but most ppl haven't seen it, you just told the spoiler bitch I didn't spoil anything , you whiny @ss ! Please do humanity a favor and don't put your retarded sperm inside another woman's pussy. |
|
DingoMatty
New Member
You know what they say; if you don't have anything nice to say, come sit by me.
Posts: 188 
Likes: 48
|
Post by DingoMatty on Jun 30, 2017 9:56:41 GMT
I thought Kidman was the best, in that I felt she captured the tone of the film perfectly. Farrell certainly maintains his own though. It's between those two IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by urbanpatrician on Jul 1, 2017 5:55:34 GMT
Kidman - I think she was the best. Has the appearance of someone who keeps the house together well while dealing with the various problems around her. She conveys pressure very well - the pressure of dealing with this Farrell showing up situation, of course.
Farrell - has command and strength. Probably better for the tone of the movie than my original preference for Jackman. I think he should've been cast here after all - not sure what more Jackman could've added anyways.
Fanning - the ideal next Coppola muse (after Dunst gets too old). It's so obvious after watching this - she's the school of the minimalism, and can be cunning and clever (like her role calls for here) when she needs it.
Dunst - Getting kinda tired of her thing, tbh. *wince wince scrunch scrunch* *looks troubled* Did that in Fargo too, but she was still kinda enjoyable in that, but I kinda longed for her days as Mary Jane in Spider Man watching her here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2017 20:12:45 GMT
It's Dunst, without question. With Coppola's bizarre erasure of all historical and societal context in translating the novel, Dunst is the only actor who adds nuance and subtext to her performance - the peaks of backstory and Dunst's defiant dignity make her Edwina by far the most interesting, sympathetic character.
|
|
