|
|
Post by iheartamyadams on Jun 22, 2017 15:35:34 GMT
Not sure how this is going to be received by critics, I'm not expecting raves but Jake Gyllenhaal absolutely kills it. I was floored.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Jun 22, 2017 15:43:32 GMT
Was David Gordon Green possessed by the spirit of Peter Berg in the making of this film?
Gyllenhaal looks committed, but man, you could play Oscar Bait Bingo just from the trailer itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by iheartamyadams on Jun 22, 2017 15:53:01 GMT
Patriots Day is actually a better film and I see that only managed a 69 metascore. Hard to see this one fairing better than that but I can see something like Jake Gyllenhaal getting a SAG nomination since there's at least three contenders that I doubt will get screeners out in time.
|
|
morton
Based
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2,954
|
Post by morton on Jun 22, 2017 16:01:39 GMT
Was David Gordon Green possessed by the spirit of Peter Berg in the making of this film? Gyllenhaal looks committed, but man, you could play Oscar Bait Bingo just from the trailer itself. Yes, I'm getting shades of Bleed for This's trailer for last year; although, I'm sure that this will be better received than that was. I don't see it contending for any major awards though unfortunately because I would love to see Miranda Richardson be nominated again and win. Maybe this will be a relative success at the box office though and lead to better roles for her again. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2017 16:58:53 GMT
62 on MC incoming
|
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jun 22, 2017 17:09:17 GMT
so it's Rust and Bone + 'Murica
yikes
|
|
|
|
Post by Billy_Costigan on Jun 22, 2017 17:24:42 GMT
Looks very baity. Jake is getting in. He's been well liked in the industry and nearly got in for Nightcrawler and Nocturnal Animals.
|
|
|
|
Post by getclutch on Jun 22, 2017 17:53:15 GMT
Wow. This is going to be huge. I didn't expect that.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobbystarks on Jun 22, 2017 18:18:39 GMT
LOL this looks cornier than a feild in Nebraska but Ill see it for my boi JAKE G
|
|
|
|
Post by Joaquim on Jun 22, 2017 18:23:27 GMT
we need merc back so we can hear him hype up his boy jake g
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2017 18:31:18 GMT
Love Gyllenhaal, but this doesn't look good.
|
|
Zeb31
Based
Bernardo is not believing que vous êtes come to bing bing avec nous
Posts: 2,557 
Likes: 3,794
|
Post by Zeb31 on Jun 23, 2017 0:41:15 GMT
I can't be the only one who lost their shit at 1:59.  It looks okay. Even Gyllenhaal didn't impress me that much, but I'm willing to chalk some of that up to the trailer itself not being particularly well put together. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2017 1:28:44 GMT
Looks very baity. Jake is getting in. He's been well liked in the industry and nearly got in for Nightcrawler and Nocturnal Animals. He was snubbed for Nightcrawler after hitting all precursors, and didnt nearly get in for NA when all he got was a BAFTA nom, and the movie failed to even get a screenplay nom |
|
|
|
Post by iheartamyadams on Jun 23, 2017 2:25:30 GMT
Looks very baity. Jake is getting in. He's been well liked in the industry and nearly got in for Nightcrawler and Nocturnal Animals. I don't think he was close last year. That was probably just a result of BAFTA liking him and the film more man than other award groups. I think I'm going to predict him for this though as it's easily his most awards friendly role and one of the most baity parts in contention. These parts are either ignored entirely or land the nom, the one recent exception that stands out in my mind is John Hawkes in The Sessions. |
|
|
|
Post by Billy_Costigan on Jun 23, 2017 15:53:37 GMT
Looks very baity. Jake is getting in. He's been well liked in the industry and nearly got in for Nightcrawler and Nocturnal Animals. I don't think he was close last year. That was probably just a result of BAFTA liking him and the film more man than other award groups. I think I'm going to predict him for this though as it's easily his most awards friendly role and one of the most baity parts in contention. These parts are either ignored entirely or land the nom, the one recent exception that stands out in my mind is John Hawkes in The Sessions. Eh, if you get a BAFTA nod, you're in the conversation. Nightcrawler and Nocturnal Animals are not really Oscar friendly films either. This is probably his most Oscar friendly role, so I'm thinking he gets in. |
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Jun 23, 2017 16:11:40 GMT
I used to say the DGG was too weird, too much of his own thing to make a formulaic movie like this so why do they hire him?
Looks like I was wrong because I can pretty much guess every scene in this film and how I'm expected to feel about it. Jake looks on form but I think movies like this aren't passing my BS detector test these days.
|
|
|
|
Post by moonman157 on Jun 23, 2017 17:12:09 GMT
Is there a weirder filmography in contemporary movies than David Gordon Greene's? All the Real Girls and George Washington are masterpieces. Then he's made a bunch of shit, a few good ones here and there, and now trash like this? What in the fuck.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2017 17:52:00 GMT
I don't think he was close last year. That was probably just a result of BAFTA liking him and the film more man than other award groups. I think I'm going to predict him for this though as it's easily his most awards friendly role and one of the most baity parts in contention. These parts are either ignored entirely or land the nom, the one recent exception that stands out in my mind is John Hawkes in The Sessions. Eh, if you get a BAFTA nod, you're in the conversation. Nightcrawler and Nocturnal Animals are not really Oscar friendly films either. This is probably his most Oscar friendly role, so I'm thinking he gets in. That's not the best logic when it's the only precursor you get Was Julie Walters in contention because she got a BAFTA nom for Brooklyn |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2017 18:11:00 GMT
Patriots Day is really a lot better than people give it credit for. But, yeah... this looks pretty awful.
|
|
|
|
Post by iheartamyadams on Jun 23, 2017 18:12:30 GMT
I don't think he was close last year. That was probably just a result of BAFTA liking him and the film more man than other award groups. I think I'm going to predict him for this though as it's easily his most awards friendly role and one of the most baity parts in contention. These parts are either ignored entirely or land the nom, the one recent exception that stands out in my mind is John Hawkes in The Sessions. Eh, if you get a BAFTA nod, you're in the conversation. Nightcrawler and Nocturnal Animals are not really Oscar friendly films either. This is probably his most Oscar friendly role, so I'm thinking he gets in. Being in the conversation and nearly getting in aren't exactly the same thing. How often do sole BAFTA nominations translate into Oscar nominations? BAFTAs Denzel bias is the only reason he got the nomination in the first place and I think Edgerton would've sooner snuck in if anyone managed to break through what felt like a pretty set top five. |
|
|
|
Post by iheartamyadams on Aug 24, 2017 2:01:03 GMT
Jeff Sneider @theinsneider
Hearing STRONGER features a very good Jake Gyllenhaal performance but that it's not quite the stuff Best Picture nominees are made of.
3:22 PM · Aug 23, 2017
Very good is an understatement. I cried TBH 😭
|
|
|
|
Post by tastytomatoes on Sept 2, 2017 9:05:16 GMT
Another still  |
|
AKenjiB
Badass
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 653
|
Post by AKenjiB on Sept 2, 2017 19:48:04 GMT
I'm pretty interested in this purely because his name is Jeff Bauman which is coincidentally also my uncle's name. Sadly nothing in the trailer grabbed me in the way I was hoping it would.
|
|
