|
|
Post by Sharbs on Jun 9, 2017 22:01:36 GMT
Not over Mad Max
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Jun 9, 2017 22:26:11 GMT
HELL YES IT WAS DESERVED.
This is coming from someone that thought the movie was crap, btw. I'd love to say that the practical effects Fury Road was the best of the nominees, but Ex Machina had some of the best use of CGI I've ever seen. It never distracted and it always did exactly what it was supposed to do; enhance the story.
And that story needed all of the enhancing it could get.
|
|
|
|
Post by taranofprydain on Jun 9, 2017 23:21:52 GMT
Deserved
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on Jun 13, 2017 8:47:31 GMT
I'd love to say yes, but Mad Max...so no.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Jun 13, 2017 14:37:51 GMT
As a winner on its own, I think it's a very deserving film. I love the minimalism and the "less is more" aspect that makes it likely able to age very well in the coming years. But it also happened to win in what I consider the strongest year for the category in recent memory, and it shouldn't have won out over Fury Road, which deserved to sweep every tech. But on its own merits, yeah, it's a good winner.
|
|
|
|
Post by bruinjoe96 on Jun 13, 2017 16:03:01 GMT
Yes, it was the most impressive of the 5 nominees simply because it was an independent film, and it only had a $15 million budget.
|
|
