|
|
Post by Brother Fease on Nov 16, 2023 2:02:22 GMT
This will be his fourth time hosting. Do you agree with the choice?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Nov 16, 2023 2:09:56 GMT
the Matt Damon jokes write themselves
|
|
|
|
Post by The_Cake_of_Roth on Nov 16, 2023 3:21:07 GMT
I don’t mind him, but this just reeks of “No one else seems to want to do it anymore and we’re sick of trying to find new people, so fuck it” decision making lol
|
|
speeders
Based
Posts: 4,099 
Likes: 2,217
|
Post by speeders on Nov 16, 2023 10:41:59 GMT
His fourth time? Feels like his fortieth.
|
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Nov 16, 2023 11:09:58 GMT
"This will be his fourth time hosting. Do you agree with the choice?"This Bleach Demon wore Blackface and Black Woman Face No Less ....... by all logic his sexist, rrrrrrrrr-acist, homophobic, transphobic ass should be cancelled by the fanatical lunatics who make up the 2023 version of The Regressive Left in America. On the other hand......I have mastered the smart ass use of the bold function and he's hosting the Oscars for the 4th time so that maybe is the punishment .......   |
|
|
|
Post by Brother Fease on Nov 16, 2023 12:22:23 GMT
It is a safe choice, and that is what they are looking for. Kimmel is one of the few Oscar hosts which people haven’t complained about. Yes, there is a crowd that dislikes Kimmel, but they are not going to watch the Oscars.
|
|
tep
Full Member
formerly known as Ban
Posts: 590
Likes: 156
|
Post by tep on Nov 16, 2023 12:53:58 GMT
Eh, whatever. I actually thought he did a pretty decent job last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brother Fease on Nov 16, 2023 13:03:35 GMT
Eh, whatever. I actually thought he did a pretty decent job last year. That’s why he is back. Positive feedback. |
|
tep
Full Member
formerly known as Ban
Posts: 590
Likes: 156
|
Post by tep on Nov 16, 2023 13:15:32 GMT
Eh, whatever. I actually thought he did a pretty decent job last year. That’s why he is back. Positive feedback. Yeah, makes sense. I don’t watch the Oscars for the host, so the safe, unoffensive choice is fine by me. PS is that an unbreeched FDR in your profile picture? |
|
|
|
Post by Brother Fease on Nov 16, 2023 13:54:48 GMT
That’s why he is back. Positive feedback. Yeah, makes sense. I don’t watch the Oscars for the host, so the safe, unoffensive choice is fine by me. PS is that an unbreeched FDR in your profile picture? It is indeed. Very impressive. |
|
|
|
Post by mikediastavrone96 on Nov 16, 2023 15:11:21 GMT
It'd be nice to have a host sometime who can actually perform and shows some love for movies as an artform.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Nov 16, 2023 16:22:08 GMT
I really don't mind this. Kimmel might actually be my favourite Oscar host since I started watching the ceremonies, aside from Billy Crystal (and even then, it's not that wide a gulf).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2023 20:41:08 GMT
I really don't mind this. Kimmel might actually be my favourite Oscar host since I started watching the ceremonies, aside from Billy Crystal (and even then, it's not that wide a gulf). Don't you want to see Seth MacFarlane one more time? |
|
|
|
Post by stabcaesar on Nov 18, 2023 15:56:42 GMT
I really don't mind this. Kimmel might actually be my favourite Oscar host since I started watching the ceremonies, aside from Billy Crystal (and even then, it's not that wide a gulf). Don't you want to see Seth MacFarlane one more time? MacFarlane is legit the funniest host in recent memory. Jon Stewart was pretty good too actually. Jimmy Kimmel is ok, which is more than you can say about pretty much all the rest of them. |
|
