Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2017 18:41:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on May 9, 2017 19:00:36 GMT
Apparently the studio may have meddled with the film because the editing has been listed as a major issue with it.
Brad Jones midnight screening video on the film was hilarious though.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmalone on May 9, 2017 19:22:03 GMT
Didn't have much faith in this from the beginning, but didn't expect such a negative response.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on May 9, 2017 19:37:37 GMT
called it the second I saw that godawful Comic-Con trailer last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by taranofprydain on May 9, 2017 19:56:04 GMT
I saw that earlier, and it definitely shocked me.
|
|
|
|
Post by IndianaJones1981 on May 9, 2017 21:42:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on May 9, 2017 21:47:12 GMT
It definitely looks horrible so I am not surprised . Just a giant cgi fest (a giant elephant?! Seriously ?) PASS
|
|
|
|
Post by tastytomatoes on May 10, 2017 12:40:11 GMT
It definitely looks horrible so I am not surprised . Just a giant cgi fest (a giant elephant?! Seriously ?) PASS  Your point? Giant elephants from Lord of the Rings: Return of the King. |
|
speeders
Based
Posts: 4,096 
Likes: 2,214
|
Post by speeders on May 10, 2017 13:17:25 GMT
called it the second I saw that godawful Comic-Con trailer last year. Same here. Looked like a massive critical and financial flop from that moment. |
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on May 10, 2017 14:55:05 GMT
It definitely looks horrible so I am not surprised . Just a giant cgi fest (a giant elephant?! Seriously ?) PASS Your point? Giant elephants from Lord of the Rings: Return of the King. lol touche! But I'm not a big LOTR fan anyways. My point is that the giant elephant in King Arthur looks so ridiculous and goofy. Won't be wasting my money on seeing that shit in theaters. And this is coming from a Charlie Humman fan too . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 15:15:15 GMT
rip
|
|
|
|
Post by mizzaphoenix on May 10, 2017 16:54:15 GMT
Guy Ritchie is terrible anyway, why are people surprised this is bad?
|
|
CookiesNCream
Badass
So what else is new?
Posts: 1,064 
Likes: 478
|
Post by CookiesNCream on May 11, 2017 3:28:55 GMT
7% from Top Critics and 24% overall at the moment.
Not a good sign, I guess. Doesn't look like to be the kind of movie that would appeal to me all much to begin with.
Who knows where that overall Tomato score could stand upon its premiere?
|
|
|
|
Post by Joaquim on May 11, 2017 3:34:40 GMT
|
|
AKenjiB
Badass
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 653
|
Post by AKenjiB on May 11, 2017 4:22:29 GMT
Ouch. And the film already seemed like a pretty big risk at the box office. The negative reviews aren't going to help with that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 3:28:16 GMT
Sooooooo after seeing the film for myself...I gotta say...it may not be bottom-of-the-barrel bad, but it sure is a hot mess. Shit was happening all over the place, we learn next to nothing about anyone that wasn't Hunnam or Law, and it's edited so fucking weirdly that it becomes a chore to follow.
But yeah, it'd be great if none of y'all could hit me with "I told you so's". -______-
|
|
