Allenism
Badass
Posts: 1,489 
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by Allenism on Feb 8, 2022 17:58:05 GMT
IDK why, but Buckley's nomination brought to mind Hawkins'. Both unexpected, precursor-free, semi-coattail nominations in that category.
Anyways, like both but prefer Buckley.
ETA: Didn't fact-check the absence of precursors, just working from memory.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2022 18:03:05 GMT
Hawkins, and it's not close at all for me. I assume I'll be in the minority here, though. 
|
|
|
|
Post by JangoB on Feb 8, 2022 18:03:05 GMT
Easily Hawkins. And she did get BAFTA and Golden Globe nominations when those still mattered |
|
Allenism
Badass
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by Allenism on Feb 8, 2022 18:14:58 GMT
Easily Hawkins. And she did get BAFTA and Golden Globe nominations when those still mattered  Ah, ok, so Hawkins had more lead-up. |
|
|
|
Post by jasonjoliepitt on Feb 8, 2022 18:51:40 GMT
Wow. That's super hard for me to choose as they were both really brilliant performances. Guess I'd give Buckley the slight edge.
|
|
|
|
Post by stabcaesar on Feb 8, 2022 19:05:37 GMT
Hawkins but not because I liked her in Blue Jasmine. Her snub for Happy-Go-Lucky was so unforgiveable that any subsequent nomination is justified in my book.
Buckley's performance is slightly better but I didn't like it much either. She should've been nominated for Wild Rose instead.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Feb 8, 2022 19:31:51 GMT
hmmmm two supporting perfs I'm not crazy about. Hawkins' is probably more complete but IMO (and I know I'm in a minority here) she wasn't a great fit for Allen's dialogue. I think someone else could've done more with that role. And I've already talked about my reservations about Buckley's perf but I'd probably go with hers. Chalk it up to recency bias I guess  |
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Feb 9, 2022 0:39:17 GMT
Buckley by far. Hawkins is awful in that film.
|
|
