|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Apr 22, 2017 12:53:28 GMT
Favourite Golden Globe nominated performance ?
Mine : IN FUCKIN' BRUGES !
|
|
|
|
Post by harlequinade on Apr 22, 2017 12:54:57 GMT
In Bruges
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2017 14:58:04 GMT
In Bruges.
I liked a few things about the Lobster, Farrell's performance was not one of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Apr 22, 2017 19:11:52 GMT
Colin was borderline annoying in Bruges. He was too OTT for me, especially next to Gleason's much more grounded and quiet performance. The Lobster all the way.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Apr 22, 2017 19:23:32 GMT
In Bruges is the best performance of his career. The Lobster is nowhere near that peak.
|
|
jamesh5
Junior Member
IMDb profile: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur24556707/
Posts: 259 
Likes: 55
|
Post by jamesh5 on Apr 23, 2017 13:21:27 GMT
The Lobster is very good work. Bruges is all-time worthy for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by cheesecake on Apr 24, 2017 4:04:03 GMT
In Bruges.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on Apr 24, 2017 11:44:02 GMT
In Bruges
Slightly better performance, but The Lobster is the slightly better film. The margins in both decisions are tiny.
|
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on Apr 25, 2017 3:55:28 GMT
In Bruges for sure. Better performance & film. I couldn't even finish The Lobster (didn't like that film at all and don't get the appeal )
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2017 3:57:36 GMT
The Lobster is a better film, but his performance is definitely better in In Bruges
|
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Apr 25, 2017 20:13:43 GMT
In Bruges. I thought he was emotionless in The Lobster, I understand that was the point, but I didn't care for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ibbi on Apr 25, 2017 20:21:47 GMT
They're a pair of tragicomic masterclasses. I suppose I'd go with The Lobster, but they're both amongst the best leading actor turns of their respective years.
|
|
|
|
Post by getclutch on May 5, 2017 17:19:02 GMT
In Bruges.
|
|
