|
Post by pacinoyes on Jun 30, 2021 15:46:37 GMT
Thoughts - in a broader sense - not only did Melania not get a cover (or coverage period) - neither did some other Republican first ladies on the cover -I think? Like any recently haven't right - I don't know for sure?) Now, that is fine of course - they are a private magazine and can do whatever they want - and a Republican first lady probably wouldn't sell ........ Do you think there'd ever be a chance that ANY future Republican first lady is on the cover or is the culture just permanently separated on pop culture things like this? This of course presupposes there ever will actually be another Republican first lady to begin with On a lighter note...........what do you think about the cover? Where's the First cleavage or First side boob photo? Grrrrrrrrrrrr
|
|
|
Post by Joaquim on Jun 30, 2021 16:34:03 GMT
Melania did get coverage
It just wasn’t positive
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Jul 2, 2021 23:50:58 GMT
First Ladies are covers when the President popularity is fading. The First Lady usually has a more positive immage than her husband. It's all Propaganda.- If Donald Trump trully wanted Melania (and Melania desired that) in Vogue or other magazine cover, she should be in everyone-everywhere.-
Except Nancy Reagan and Betty Ford, Republican first ladies in the past 50 years, were much low profile, partially because the press was more Democrat, but specially because the Republican voter don't believe in Ostentation.- People loved Barbara Bush TV Golden Girls looks, and still love Laura Bush modesty, they don't wanted a housewife and a school teacher in Vogue, and definitive neither of them want to be the cover of these magazines, in fact Laura and her husband protects their rebelious teen daughters from the press.-
Yep but Trump is the immage of ostentation, yep he is, and with just one Trump is more than enough. Maybe if he won a seccond term with a huge majority, Melania as the Good Cop, would appear more in Magazines.-
Any way about Dr. Jill Biden, I guess that not everybody loves Kamala Harris, so if Kamala has the role of the bad policewoman, Jill is definitive the good one. The good advisor of her husband, who tries to rescue from the radical agenda, who takes health care. She is the suffering wife. Of course this is propaganda and not reality.-
EDIT. Apparently in 130 never a Republican First lady was a Vogue cover Magazine, still the source is vague, when said that the last 3 first ladies and Kamala Harris were covered. So what happened to the rest of Democratic First ladies? They were or not on Vogue Cover Magazine? What about the Republican First ladies, First daughters and Politians of the early XX C, maybe there were, but they are lost, or at least not in internet, or maybe Vogue Magazine not allows the first ladies in the cover until Anna Wintour, who only likes Democrats women.-
|
|