petition to ban anyone who says

The city symphony thing could apply to KOC and STS, but not To the Wonder.   That is a huge distinction, yes.  To the Wonder is also the more fanciful by far from those 3.  That distinction is clear to me.   To the Wonder can also be construed as a narrative, but I think the other two probably aren't quite.

But I think the similarities are something we see from Malick as early as The New World, he seems to place two people in a relationship, and then through time it gradually fades, then another relationship is later formed, and it's like.... ok so, a bunch of relationships in two tangents of time.  So what happens next?  I realize that's just life.... but to me they are pretty structurally similar, and can be too boring to overcome, especially since many people can suggest that Malick has become a bit dependent on formula now.  

I think STS is more of a modern story, while KOC seems a classical tale with a sort of grand biblical entity implied, and I realize they're not 100% similar, but even realizing those differences, is that enough to distinguish them fully against one another?

Can we instead ban anyone who tries to suggest that Knight of Cups is good?

I've not seen Song to Song, but the other two are definitely similar, but I think that's because they (along with The Tree of Life) are part of a loose autobiographical trilogy delving into similar themes and approach those themes in a complementary fashion.

No.

Do you mean you love every other Malick movie? because this is contradictory

There's nothing wrong with correcting minor details. I'm corrected everyday, it's nothing to complain about. Get over it. 

how are they any more autobiographical than, say, The Tree of Life? or another one, how are they autobiographical when the lead characters are nothing alike? i understand they might be different elements of malick's identity or w/e but since the dude never comments on anything i think it's reaching to assume that 1, 2, 3, or 0 of the films are autobiographical; we just don't really know. but going off of the leads in all 3 being vastly different, i would doubt that all 3 of them are terry portraying himself.

I don't know what this means. 

idk man i don't think them being set in the present/around malick's childhood makes em inherently more autobiographic than his other works. i also think the examples given aren't really all that similar necessarily to what went down in his life: TToL portrays 3 brothers and not 2, one dies from a military death rather than suicide, most of the film doesn't focus on this, and his childhood in texas may have had few real similarities to what we're shown (since his stuff about john smith feels as personal as anything in these films it's hard for me to quantify what is and isn't "personal" for malick). similarly in TtW, we don't have any idea how similar the circumstances are (and the location is vastly different), and with KoC he doesn't even live in or near hollywood and that plot more or less stems from Pilgrim's Progress and the hero's journey of all things; like yes there are similarities to his life but i would argue that any auteur is going to have at least some of those elements in any of their films. furthermore, since the characters can't be connected by their own personalities (other than in the malick sense of "they wander around sometimes and feel sad and say pretentious things" which is a staple of most of his characters) i'm not really seeing how the films are similar other than some of their elements overlapping with malick's life events. 

Sorry but to anyone who has either a) lost their virginity or b) graduated high school, correcting minor details on the internet looks hilariously pathetic.