|
Post by pupdurcs on Nov 25, 2020 9:06:11 GMT
She was a prestige actress at one point. Meaning if you attached her to a project, there was a strong likelyhood that she'd be in the running or nominated for major awards. She's a two-time Oscar nominee for 21 Grams and The Impossible.
But the failure of Diana in hindsight may have been a massive turning point in her career. She recieved a Worst Actress Razzie nomination (along with Movie 43). I mean, prestige actors have been nominated for Razzies before and made full recoveries, but it feels like the esteem the industry once had for her nosedived after that film and she never got it back.
She got a bit of minor and ensemble based recognition for being in a Best Picture nominee Birdman the following year, but that was pretty much it. Since then, she's pretty much been major awards poison, which has in effect diminished her worth in the industry as a "prestige actress". There is an argument to be made that most of her films or performances since then aren't good or acclaimed enough to merit awards consideration. But she was in one of the most acclaimed TV shows of 2017, David Lynch's Twin Peaks, was nominated for Emmys and saw Kyle Mclaclan nominated for a Golden Globe. But Watts almost seemed invisible when the show got feted. The Loudest Voice, another prestige TV project with Watts in a major role, won a Golden Globe for Russell Crowe and saw him nominated for major awards like SAG. But yet again, no major awards went near her. At one point just being in those projects would have guranteed her nominations at least.
Interesting how one role or performance can seemingly completely derail how you become percieved in the industry.
|
|
|
Post by mhynson27 on Nov 25, 2020 9:25:44 GMT
This should be fun
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Nov 25, 2020 10:58:38 GMT
Indeed.
|
|
|
Post by franklin on Nov 25, 2020 11:46:31 GMT
I genuinely think that even when she was at her peak career wise, she just never was considered or revered, in terms of films and performances, at the same level of her fellow Australian actresses Cate Blanchett and Nicole Kidman.
That played a big role in failing to keep good filmmakers being interested working with her and to sustain a respectable film career in the long run.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Nov 25, 2020 12:40:27 GMT
So many pacinoyes snarky thoughts......first and maybe most relevant/snarky: Is this thread what passes for a board fight because I regularly throw much more sly levels of shade with like 20 people PER day......I mean one day I'm gonna DIE people, and you'll miss me when I'm gone/banned/assassinated My other thoughts are looooooooooooooooooooooong after my death, will this board still insist that Russell Crowe doesn't flat out blow goats in The Loudest Voice because he does. But more importantly, to me this question doesn't really apply to anyone in the post-DVD era (unless I'm drawing a blank)......that's why stars would make a movie every 2 years back then to mitigate the risk of failure....after the DVD era, stars were less starry......movies were less movieish.......... flops were less floppy (modern example: Ryan Reynolds, natch)..... Yes, for women the flops matter more - oh fnck you pacinoyes you CIS, almost cartoonishly heterosexual white male with your disgusting penis! - but I can't think of one flop single flop that did this to anyone in the post-DVD era really (?)
|
|
|
Post by mhynson27 on Nov 25, 2020 12:55:16 GMT
Man liked his own post.
|
|
wattsnew
Full Member
Posts: 712
Likes: 347
|
Post by wattsnew on Nov 26, 2020 1:12:51 GMT
Someone was really bothered by a post of mine 😂 god, you are so transparent!
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Nov 26, 2020 1:22:39 GMT
No.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Nov 26, 2020 5:44:53 GMT
Someone was really bothered by a post of mine 😂 god, you are so transparent! Nope, you are the one who is transparent. I'm an open book. I 100% admit I was influenced to post this by your 1000th diatribe against Kidman, because of your incrediblely transparent envy that Watts isn't as revevered or as successful as her. But hey, you helped give me good material (always useful) and it's genuinely a good idea for a thread that I never would have thought about otherwise, so thank you, and I genuinely believe in the theory and premise behind it (that Diana may have been responsible for her career downturn). You gave me inspiration.I usually don't mind Watts to be honest, and have little to no interest in taking regular digs at her. She is someone I rarely actively talk about. She's not really on my radar, other than when I notice you consistently attacking her bestie to compensate for the state of her career .
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Dec 1, 2020 5:18:04 GMT
Not at all, she is a hit or miss, and makes like half dozen movies per year.-
Just wasn't in something as big as King Kong.- So itsn't Diana, probably there are 2 dozen of worse films/series/miniseries/TV movies than that-
|
|