|
|
Post by Allenism on Sept 18, 2020 21:24:35 GMT
Moore is less consistent and has done a lot more crap, but I think she's stretched herself more as a performer and has reached greater emotional heights. Foster's techniques can be commanding but they also lack grace.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Sept 18, 2020 21:41:23 GMT
Both have given some truly staggering performances, and both are guilty of some really, really bad ones as well. I do think Foster's more consistent, though.
|
|
speeders
Based
Posts: 4,093 
Likes: 2,211
|
Post by speeders on Sept 18, 2020 22:19:51 GMT
The good Clarice.
|
|
|
|
Post by notacrook on Sept 18, 2020 22:27:49 GMT
Both have a couple duds to their name, but are generally fantastic and consistent actresses. I've seen much more from Moore, but Foster wins out based on her performance in Lambs alone, which probably lands in my all-time top 5 from any actor.
|
|
flasuss
Badass
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 1,615
Member is Online
|
Post by flasuss on Sept 18, 2020 22:31:57 GMT
Foster has higher highs, but her last great performance is decades old.
|
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Sept 18, 2020 22:41:03 GMT
Moore is more versatile and is challenging herself more often so her. Foster will always the best Clarice Starling, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Sept 19, 2020 13:26:23 GMT
Really really tough!! I like them both. But I think Moore is more versatile and more consistent so it's her.
|
|
avnermoriarti
Badass
Friends say I’ve changed. They’re right.
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 1,271
|
Post by avnermoriarti on Sept 19, 2020 20:21:07 GMT
I will never udnerstand the fascination for Jodie Foster and why she's considered one of the best, outside of a couple of things, to me she has the charisma of a piece of wood. Moore is far more interesting, daring, wild, can go off the rails if you want but at least she's giving something.
|
|
