|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Mar 21, 2017 9:59:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Mar 21, 2017 14:47:42 GMT
De Niro + Pfeiffer = future Emmy + GG + SAG winners ?
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on May 20, 2017 13:52:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by stephen on May 20, 2017 15:33:20 GMT
It's got a 67 on Metacritic. Sounds like De Niro and Pfeiffer are great, but the movie didn't really explore Madoff well enough. It's a real shame if that's true. The Dreyfuss film had the same issues; Dreyfuss was phenomenal but the rest of the film just couldn't sustain his great work. It needed a Terence Winter-level script.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2017 16:02:39 GMT
Not attractive!
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on May 20, 2017 16:14:46 GMT
I kind of think some of the negative reviews are holding Madoff himself to standard that he wasn't really at.........you know the banality of evil might just be that. I'll be watching for DeNiro anyway but I think it may be better than the RT and Metacritic numbers suggest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2017 19:18:05 GMT
I havent seen it yet. Is De Niro in better form this time?
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on Aug 21, 2017 19:23:10 GMT
I give it something like **1/2 or ***... at the core there's a good character piece, but I think it suffers behind the camera due to the drastically different style changes throughout. Good performances from the principle cast, De Niro included (it's not exactly a performance to write home about, though).
|
|