|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 4, 2019 2:30:36 GMT
Chow Yun-Fat
Genre: Hong Kong Cinema (Crime/Action)
Chow has been one of the world's great movie stars since the 1980's. Quentin Tarantino built his early career ripping off (sorry, "homaging") movies carried by Chow (City On Fire, directed by Ringo Lam and starring Chow, was famously heavily cribbed by Tarantino, plot and everything, for Resevoir Dogs. Tarantino rightly banked that Hollywood and most western audiences would have no clue that he was pretty much taking a Hong Kong film, remaking it wholesale and passing it off as an original product).
Anyways, moving on from the Magpie tendencies of Tarantino, Chow built a huge reputation in Hong Kong movies throughout the 1980's and 1990's. Equally adept at comedy and drama, Chow had an effortless charisma that has seen him compared to Western movie legends like Robert Mitchum. Like Mitchum, Chow is also a great and slightly underrated screen actor, perhaps because he makes it all look too easy. From films like The God Of Gamblers to A Better Tomorrow, Chow built up a reputation for effortless cool. His collaborations with director John Woo are probably what brought him to the attention of most western cinema audiences. Woo and Chow were a brilliant partnership. Like John Ford and John Wayne. They started with A Better Tomorrow, A Better Tomorrow 2, The Killer and Once A Thief. But it was arguably their work in action/crime classic Hard Boiled that really caught the attention of western audiences, with the iconic image of Chow holding a baby in one hand and a pump action shotgun in the other. It was gold, and Hollywood came calling for both men.
Unsurprisingly, Hollywood has never utilised Chow as well as Hong Kong, but Chow has taken to the role of international movie star with all the grace and aplomb you'd expect. From easily holding his own with peak Jodie Foster in Anna And The King to leading the cast of Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon to global phenom status, Chow is one of the few Hong Kong/Chinese movie stars that is easily recognisable to Western audiences. And rightfully so. Below, the trailer for Hard Boiled:
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 4, 2019 6:17:52 GMT
Yun-Fat is a legend of Hong-Kong cinema, and one of the absolute greats. I mean he's worth 714m, and by all accounts is very generous (he gave most of his money to charity recently). In most of his best roles, he's not doing martial-artists (although he has obviously done classic martial arts type movies like Crouching Tiger), as much as he's a master of gunfights, and fists. A Better Tomorrow in particular features one of the absolute best shoot-out scenes ever, and similarly in Hard Boiled, he's really powerful, without necessarily being 100% intimating, while also showing-off his skills. He and John Woo are truly one of cinema's great director / actor pairing.
The problem with Chow's Hollywood career is the same thing that befell Jackie Chan, and Jet-Li, stereotyping, and getting bad-scripts. Hollywood is infamous for putting certain actors of ethnicity's into particular boxes, and Chow was no different. Aside from Anna and The King, I don't think he ever got English language film that really allowed him to show skills, instead he was mostly regulated to silly action films. Him being wasted in Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, is one of that movies many sins. In comparison back in Hong Kong, he did dramatic roles all the time.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 4, 2019 13:24:05 GMT
The problem with Chow's Hollywood career is the same thing that befell Jackie Chan, and Jet-Li, stereotyping, and getting bad-scripts. Hollywood is infamous for putting certain actors of ethnicity's into particular boxes, and Chow was no different. Aside from Anna and The King, I don't think he ever got English language film that really allowed him to show skills, instead he was mostly regulated to silly action films. Him being wasted in Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, is one of that movies many sins. In comparison back in Hong Kong, he did dramatic roles all the time. Absolutely. Chow is more of a pure dramatic actor than Li or Chan, so I feel like his being wasted by Hollywood in poorly scripted action films was doubly egregious. He was terrific in Anna And The King (better than Jodie Foster actually, who was good) and who knows, a few more opportunities like that and he might have been picking up an Oscar. Shame.
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 4, 2019 16:05:21 GMT
The problem with Chow's Hollywood career is the same thing that befell Jackie Chan, and Jet-Li, stereotyping, and getting bad-scripts. Hollywood is infamous for putting certain actors of ethnicity's into particular boxes, and Chow was no different. Aside from Anna and The King, I don't think he ever got English language film that really allowed him to show skills, instead he was mostly regulated to silly action films. Him being wasted in Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, is one of that movies many sins. In comparison back in Hong Kong, he did dramatic roles all the time. Absolutely. Chow is more of a pure dramatic actor than Li or Chan, so I feel like his being wasted by Hollywood in poorly scripted action films was doubly egregious. He was terrific in Anna And The King (better than Jodie Foster actually, who was good) and who knows, a few more opportunities like that and he might have been picking up an Oscar. Shame. Oh yes, he always known as a versatile actor in his home country. He could have absolutely won an Oscar, if Hollywood wasn't so one-sided. I love that quote of his "In the West audiences think I am a stereotyped action star, or that I always play hitmen or killers. But in Hong Kong, I did a lot of comedy, many dramatic films, and most of all, romantic roles, lots of love stories. I was like a romance novel hero." Dude could have starred in a romantic comedy, and it would have been great.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 4, 2019 18:25:31 GMT
Kevin ConroyGenre: Voice-Over/AnimationWho Is the actor that has given the best performance in the role of Batman? Most people reflexively err to one of the several actors who have played the role in a live action incarnation. Michael Keaton, Christian Bale and so on. But to very many discerning people, the most brilliant and perhaps the definitive portrayal of The Dark Knight belongs to a man most people would not even recognise if he passed you in the street. Because Kevin Conroy, the brilliant, inspired voice-over actor, has never played Batman in live action . But his nuanced and modulated cadences have brought Bruce Wayne/Batman to life for hundreds of millions of people for the last 25 years, which is how long he has been playing the role across dozens (possibly hundreds at this point) of animated projects and video games. There have been actors that have filled in for the voice of Batman in various animated projects (notable ones with major live action careers like Peter Weller and Bruce Greenwood) but inevitably, Conroy is always asked to return, as his vocal styling have become so much the gold standard for the role, that his presence lends any voice-overs project featuring Batman major credibility. Conroy first voiced the role in the legendary, ground-breaking, Emmy Award winning Batman: The Animated Series in the early 90's, but he would get to voice the Dark Knight in at least one cinema release, 1993's Batman: Mask Of The Phantasm. Conroy's longevity and success in this iconic role has been stunning, particularly as studios have often been seeking out major movie stars and celebrities to do voice-overs work for their major characters in animation, as opposed to specialist voice-overs actors like Conroy. You might not be able to recognise him if he passed you in the street, but in his field, his genre of acting, his impact is undeniable and worthy of praise. Below is a video of the great voice-over actor at work , with a terrific Mark Hamill also doing his iconic voice interpretation of The Joker: Some awesome news regarding the great voice-over actor Kevin Conroy, that we talked about a few weeks ago as arguably the greatest performer of the Batman/Bruce Wayne role, who has also never played the role in live action. Well in the immortal words of Quantum Leap, "to put right, what once went wrong", Conroy will finally get his chance to add his name to the roster of actors who have played Batman/Bruce Wayne in live action, as he has been cast as a future version of Bruce Wayne/Batman in the CW's "Arrowverse" crossover event Crisis On Infinite Earths.I don't even watch those Arrowverse shows (gave them a shot, found most of them too cheesy with ropey acting), but what a classy move by the producers to give Conroy this gig after voicing the Dark Knight for 25 years All we need next is for Karl Urban to be cast in some Oscarbait drama directed by Spielberg/PTA/ Scorsese and this thread will really be doing it's job.lol! news.avclub.com/best-onscreen-batman-to-play-future-bruce-wayne-in-the-1836951086
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 4, 2019 18:51:57 GMT
Kevin ConroyGenre: Voice-Over/AnimationWho Is the actor that has given the best performance in the role of Batman? Most people reflexively err to one of the several actors who have played the role in a live action incarnation. Michael Keaton, Christian Bale and so on. But to very many discerning people, the most brilliant and perhaps the definitive portrayal of The Dark Knight belongs to a man most people would not even recognise if he passed you in the street. Because Kevin Conroy, the brilliant, inspired voice-over actor, has never played Batman in live action . But his nuanced and modulated cadences have brought Bruce Wayne/Batman to life for hundreds of millions of people for the last 25 years, which is how long he has been playing the role across dozens (possibly hundreds at this point) of animated projects and video games. There have been actors that have filled in for the voice of Batman in various animated projects (notable ones with major live action careers like Peter Weller and Bruce Greenwood) but inevitably, Conroy is always asked to return, as his vocal styling have become so much the gold standard for the role, that his presence lends any voice-overs project featuring Batman major credibility. Conroy first voiced the role in the legendary, ground-breaking, Emmy Award winning Batman: The Animated Series in the early 90's, but he would get to voice the Dark Knight in at least one cinema release, 1993's Batman: Mask Of The Phantasm. Conroy's longevity and success in this iconic role has been stunning, particularly as studios have often been seeking out major movie stars and celebrities to do voice-overs work for their major characters in animation, as opposed to specialist voice-overs actors like Conroy. You might not be able to recognise him if he passed you in the street, but in his field, his genre of acting, his impact is undeniable and worthy of praise. Below is a video of the great voice-over actor at work , with a terrific Mark Hamill also doing his iconic voice interpretation of The Joker: Some awesome news regarding the great voice-over actor Kevin Conroy, that we talked about a few weeks ago as arguably the greatest performer of the Batman/Bruce Wayne role, who has also never played the role in live action. Well in the immortal words of Quantum Leap, "to put right, what once went wrong", Conroy will finally get his chance to add his name to the roster of actors who have played Batman/Bruce Wayne in live action, as he has been cast as a future version of Bruce Wayne/Batman in the CW's "Arrowverse" crossover event Crisis On Infinite Earths.I don't even watch those Arrowverse shows (gave them a shot, found most of them too cheesy with ropey acting), but what a classy move by the producers to give Conroy this gig after voicing the Dark Knight for 25 years All we need next is for Karl Urban to be cast in some Oscarbait drama directed by Spielberg/PTA/ Scorsese and this thread will really be doing it's job.lol! news.avclub.com/best-onscreen-batman-to-play-future-bruce-wayne-in-the-1836951086Wow, it's almost like the producers read this thread or something. Great news. This would also be Conroy's first-live action role since 1995 too. He started his career as a TV actor, and was on a lot of shows including Cheers, before landing the part of Batman, and has basically done that role for the rest of his career since then. This is like a fanboy's dream come true, and I do watch those CW's shows, which helps.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 4, 2019 19:07:28 GMT
Some awesome news regarding the great voice-over actor Kevin Conroy, that we talked about a few weeks ago as arguably the greatest performer of the Batman/Bruce Wayne role, who has also never played the role in live action. Well in the immortal words of Quantum Leap, "to put right, what once went wrong", Conroy will finally get his chance to add his name to the roster of actors who have played Batman/Bruce Wayne in live action, as he has been cast as a future version of Bruce Wayne/Batman in the CW's "Arrowverse" crossover event Crisis On Infinite Earths.I don't even watch those Arrowverse shows (gave them a shot, found most of them too cheesy with ropey acting), but what a classy move by the producers to give Conroy this gig after voicing the Dark Knight for 25 years All we need next is for Karl Urban to be cast in some Oscarbait drama directed by Spielberg/PTA/ Scorsese and this thread will really be doing it's job.lol! news.avclub.com/best-onscreen-batman-to-play-future-bruce-wayne-in-the-1836951086Wow, it's almost like the producers read this thread or something. Great news. This would also be Conroy's first-live action role since 1995 too. He started his career as a TV actor, and was on a lot of shows including Cheers, before landing the part of Batman, and has basically done that role for the rest of his career since then. This is like a fanboy's dream come true, and I do watch those CW's shows, which helps. I really tried with the CW shows because I love the characters, but I just couldn't hack it. I lasted longest with The Flash, which I thought started off incredibly strong ( Grant Gustin is perfect as Barry Allen) , but gave up after 2 seasons when I felt all the weaknesses typical of CW Arrowverse shows began to affect it. Also really not a fan of the guy who plays Arrow (Stephen Amell). Really stiff actor. Justin Hartley who played the role on Smallville was so much better. Didn't help that I kept comparing them to the Marvel Netflix shows like Daredevil, Jessica Jones and Luke Cage, and I thought all those shows at their best made the CW stuff look even worse. But if you are still digging "em, that's all that should matter for you. I do really find the DC Universe streaming shows to be on a whole different level to the CW shows though (they share some of the same producers, but less cheese and no glaring weak links among the actors). I thought Doom Patrol and Titans were excellent, and can't wait for 2nd seasons of both. But I may dip back into the CW for this Crisis event. Conroy as Batman, but also getting Brandon Routh to play Superman again! They are certainly pulling out all the stops. Here's hoping they can execute it well.
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 4, 2019 19:27:59 GMT
Wow, it's almost like the producers read this thread or something. Great news. This would also be Conroy's first-live action role since 1995 too. He started his career as a TV actor, and was on a lot of shows including Cheers, before landing the part of Batman, and has basically done that role for the rest of his career since then. This is like a fanboy's dream come true, and I do watch those CW's shows, which helps. I really tried with the CW shows because I love the characters, but I just couldn't hack it. I lasted longest with The Flash, which I thought started off incredibly strong ( Grant Gustin is perfect as Barry Allen) , but gave up after 2 seasons when I felt all the weaknesses typical of CW Arrowverse shows began to affect it. Also really nit a fan of the guy who plays Arrow (Stephen Amell). Really stiff actor. Justin Hartley who played the role on Smallville was so much better. Didn't help that I kept comparing them to the Marvel Netflix shows like Daredevil, Jessica Jones and Luke Cage, and I thought all those shows at their best made the CW stuff look even worse. But if you are still digging "em, that's all that should matter for you. I do really find the DC Universe streaming shows to be on a whole different level to the CW shows though (they share some of the same producers, but less cheese and no glaring weak links among the actors). I thought Doom Patrol and Titans were excellent, and can't wait for 2nd seasons of both. But I may dip back into the CW for this Crisis event. Conroy as Batman, but also getting Brandon Routh to play Superman again! They are certainly pulling out all the stops. Here's hoping they can execute it well. I just really enjoyed what I saw, even though to be honest Arrow kinda fell off a cliff for me after Season Three. The Flash is much better however, it's done a good job of embracing its comic-book counterpoint immensely, however Legends of Tomorrow is now currently my favorite of the bunch. So much fun! I can understand why someone wouldn't like them as much however, Flash and especially Arrow constantly follow The CW's melodramatic love-triangle formula to a T, to the point where they can kinda be obnoxious. This crisis event sounds great though, and if anything I can appreciate that they're bringing in the big-guns this time. I was especially revealed once Warner Brothers decided to lift their ban on Batman / Superman appearances on the small screen. There's nothing wrong with other versions of those characters appearing on TV.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 5, 2019 2:55:52 GMT
Cate Blanchett
Genre: Biopic
We've already covered Australia's Greatest Actress, Nicole Kidman (at least according to denizens of this site on a thread about the subject, but probably a widely held view in other circles as well) in a different genre. So it's good to get round to her fellow Australian peer, someone who runs her close for the distinction of Australia's greatest actress and fellow GOAT contender, Cate Blanchett in a genre that really plays to Blanchett's strengths (mimicry, technical precision).
Blanchett, a trained and accomplished stage actress truly burst onto the international scene with Elizabeth, giving a stunning performance as the legendary British monarch that put the film world on notice that a future great had arrived. Blanchett displayed a screen presence and command that would make her ideal to play women of strength, authority and determination. Many felt she should have won the Oscar for Elizabeth (she lost Best Actress to Gwyneth Paltrow in Shakespeare In Love) . Blanchett later got nominated for repeating the role of Elizabeth in the poorly reviewed sequel The Golden Age, possibly in part because the loss for the first film still stung many.
Once Blanchett announced herself and her skill-set, getting her into more Biopics as strong, determined women only made sense. So she was cast as mould breaking movie icon Katharine Hepburn in Martin Scorsese's The Aviator. Full disclosure.... I'm not a big fan of Blanchett's turn as Hepburn and felt it relied too much on surface level mimicry.....But what I think doesn't really matter, as it was enough for Blanchett to win her first Oscar. Blanchett then went on to impersonate Bob Dylan in Todd Haynes somewhat gimmicky and experimental film I'm Not There, which saw 6 actors play different aspects of Dylan.
In her most recent biopic role the 2015 film Truth, Blanchett played 60 Minutes producer Mary Mapes in a film and performance that was somewhat overlooked and overshadowed by her other film that year, the period melodrama Carol. Blanchett has had a fairly uneventful run in films since 2015, but is still attached to a biopic of Lucille Ball from Aaron Sorkin. Given her facility and achievement within the genre to date, there is a pretty solid chance she'll nail the role if it ever gets made. Below a clip of Blanchett from Elizabeth narrowly avoiding an assasination attempt:
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Aug 5, 2019 6:45:44 GMT
Cate BlanchettGenre: BiopicWe've already covered Australia's Greatest Actress, Nicole Kidman (at least according to denizens of this site on a thread about the subject, but probably a widely held view in other circles as well) in a different genre. So it's good to get round to her fellow Australian peer, someone who runs her close for the distinction of Australia's greatest actress and fellow GOAT contender, Cate Blanchett in a genre that really plays to Blanchett's strengths (mimicry, technical precision). Blanchett, a trained and accomplished stage actress truly burst onto the international scene with Elizabeth, giving a stunning performance as the legendary British monarch that put the film world on notice that a future great had arrived. Blanchett displayed a screen presence and command that would make her ideal to play women of strength, authority and determination. Many felt she should have won the Oscar for Elizabeth (she lost Best Actress to Gwyneth Paltrow in Shakespeare In Love) . Blanchett later got nominated for repeating the role of Elizabeth in the poorly reviewed sequel The Golden Age, possibly in part because the loss for the first film still stung many. Once Blanchett announced herself and her skill-set, getting her into more Biopics as strong, determined women only made sense. So she was cast as mould breaking movie icon Katharine Hepburn in Martin Scorsese's The Aviator. Full disclosure.... I'm not a big fan of Blanchett's turn as Hepburn and felt it relied too much on surface level mimicry.....But what I think doesn't really matter, as it was enough for Blanchett to win her first Oscar. Blanchett then went on to impersonate Bob Dylan in Todd Haynes somewhat gimmicky and experimental film I'm Not There, which saw 6 actors play different aspects of Dylan. In her most recent biopic role the 2015 film Truth, Blanchett played 60 Minutes producer Mary Mapes in a film and performance that was somewhat overlooked and overshadowed by her other film that year, the period melodrama Carol. Blanchett has had a fairly uneventful run in films since 2015, but is still attached to a biopic of Lucille Ball from Aaron Sorkin. Given her facility and achievement within the genre to date, there is a pretty solid chance she'll nail the role if it ever gets made. Below a clip of Blanchett from Elizabeth narrowly avoiding an assasination attempt :
Imo, you just covered Australia's best actress!!!
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 5, 2019 7:22:34 GMT
Cate BlanchettGenre: BiopicWe've already covered Australia's Greatest Actress, Nicole Kidman (at least according to denizens of this site on a thread about the subject, but probably a widely held view in other circles as well) in a different genre. So it's good to get round to her fellow Australian peer, someone who runs her close for the distinction of Australia's greatest actress and fellow GOAT contender, Cate Blanchett in a genre that really plays to Blanchett's strengths (mimicry, technical precision). Blanchett, a trained and accomplished stage actress truly burst onto the international scene with Elizabeth, giving a stunning performance as the legendary British monarch that put the film world on notice that a future great had arrived. Blanchett displayed a screen presence and command that would make her ideal to play women of strength, authority and determination. Many felt she should have won the Oscar for Elizabeth (she lost Best Actress to Gwyneth Paltrow in Shakespeare In Love) . Blanchett later got nominated for repeating the role of Elizabeth in the poorly reviewed sequel The Golden Age, possibly in part because the loss for the first film still stung many. Once Blanchett announced herself and her skill-set, getting her into more Biopics as strong, determined women only made sense. So she was cast as mould breaking movie icon Katharine Hepburn in Martin Scorsese's The Aviator. Full disclosure.... I'm not a big fan of Blanchett's turn as Hepburn and felt it relied too much on surface level mimicry.....But what I think doesn't really matter, as it was enough for Blanchett to win her first Oscar. Blanchett then went on to impersonate Bob Dylan in Todd Haynes somewhat gimmicky and experimental film I'm Not There, which saw 6 actors play different aspects of Dylan. In her most recent biopic role the 2015 film Truth, Blanchett played 60 Minutes producer Mary Mapes in a film and performance that was somewhat overlooked and overshadowed by her other film that year, the period melodrama Carol. Blanchett has had a fairly uneventful run in films since 2015, but is still attached to a biopic of Lucille Ball from Aaron Sorkin. Given her facility and achievement within the genre to date, there is a pretty solid chance she'll nail the role if it ever gets made. Below a clip of Blanchett from Elizabeth narrowly avoiding an assasination attempt :
Imo, you just covered Australia's best actress!!! Like I said...we had a whole 5 page ass thread recently about this very subject (as I pointed out), and Kidman recieved the most votes by a lot. Blanchett wasn't close at all. I think she was just trying to survive Judy Davis for second place. Not that it neccesarily means anything other than Kidman having more fans/supporters on this particular site. Can't put that much stock in a relatively small sample size of voters. Maybe Blanchett wins the vote somewhere else. Maybe she doesn't. But it's very arguable, and there is a very strong case that can be made for either. My prefrence is Kidman for many different reasons (including finding her body of film/ screen performances more nuanced, transcendent and impressive) , but if someone else suggests it's Blanchett, I wouldn't call that a foolish or misguided opinion. They are both two of the very best, with very different strengths. But yeah, the thread exists for this topic. Doesn't need a rehash here. movie-awards-redux.freeforums.net/thread/12215/who-australias-greatest-actress-alive
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Aug 5, 2019 7:54:06 GMT
Imo, you just covered Australia's best actress!!! Like I said...we had a whole 5 page ass thread recently about this very subject (as I pointed out), and Kidman recieved the most votes by a lot. Blanchett wasn't close at all. I think she was just trying to survive Judy Davis for second place. Not that it neccesarily means anything other than Kidman having more fans/supporters on this particular site. Can't put that much stock in a relatively small sample size of voters. Maybe Blanchett wins the vote somewhere else. Maybe she doesn't. But it's very arguable, and there is a very strong case that can be made for either. My prefrence is Kidman for many different reasons (including finding her body of film/ screen performances more nuanced, transcendent and impressive) , but if someone else suggests it's Blanchett, I wouldn't call that a foolish or misguided opinion. They are both two of the very best, with very different strengths. But yeah, the thread exists for this topic. Doesn't need a rehash here. movie-awards-redux.freeforums.net/thread/12215/who-australias-greatest-actress-aliveI'm aware of that thread. I just posted my personal opinion. Which is, Blanchett is better by far. I respect other people's preferences but I stick to mine.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 5, 2019 8:00:53 GMT
Like I said...we had a whole 5 page ass thread recently about this very subject (as I pointed out), and Kidman recieved the most votes by a lot. Blanchett wasn't close at all. I think she was just trying to survive Judy Davis for second place. Not that it neccesarily means anything other than Kidman having more fans/supporters on this particular site. Can't put that much stock in a relatively small sample size of voters. Maybe Blanchett wins the vote somewhere else. Maybe she doesn't. But it's very arguable, and there is a very strong case that can be made for either. My prefrence is Kidman for many different reasons (including finding her body of film/ screen performances more nuanced, transcendent and impressive) , but if someone else suggests it's Blanchett, I wouldn't call that a foolish or misguided opinion. They are both two of the very best, with very different strengths. But yeah, the thread exists for this topic. Doesn't need a rehash here. movie-awards-redux.freeforums.net/thread/12215/who-australias-greatest-actress-aliveI'm aware of that thread. I just posted my personal opinion. Which is, Blanchett is better by far. I respect other people's preferences but I stick to mine. Fair enough. I disagree though
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Aug 5, 2019 10:19:27 GMT
I'm aware of that thread. I just posted my personal opinion. Which is, Blanchett is better by far. I respect other people's preferences but I stick to mine. Fair enough. I disagree though Yeah, I got that.
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 5, 2019 16:08:55 GMT
Cate BlanchettGenre: BiopicWe've already covered Australia's Greatest Actress, Nicole Kidman (at least according to denizens of this site on a thread about the subject, but probably a widely held view in other circles as well) in a different genre. So it's good to get round to her fellow Australian peer, someone who runs her close for the distinction of Australia's greatest actress and fellow GOAT contender, Cate Blanchett in a genre that really plays to Blanchett's strengths (mimicry, technical precision). Blanchett, a trained and accomplished stage actress truly burst onto the international scene with Elizabeth, giving a stunning performance as the legendary British monarch that put the film world on notice that a future great had arrived. Blanchett displayed a screen presence and command that would make her ideal to play women of strength, authority and determination. Many felt she should have won the Oscar for Elizabeth (she lost Best Actress to Gwyneth Paltrow in Shakespeare In Love) . Blanchett later got nominated for repeating the role of Elizabeth in the poorly reviewed sequel The Golden Age, possibly in part because the loss for the first film still stung many. Once Blanchett announced herself and her skill-set, getting her into more Biopics as strong, determined women only made sense. So she was cast as mould breaking movie icon Katharine Hepburn in Martin Scorsese's The Aviator. Full disclosure.... I'm not a big fan of Blanchett's turn as Hepburn and felt it relied too much on surface level mimicry.....But what I think doesn't really matter, as it was enough for Blanchett to win her first Oscar. Blanchett then went on to impersonate Bob Dylan in Todd Haynes somewhat gimmicky and experimental film I'm Not There, which saw 6 actors play different aspects of Dylan. In her most recent biopic role the 2015 film Truth, Blanchett played 60 Minutes producer Mary Mapes in a film and performance that was somewhat overlooked and overshadowed by her other film that year, the period melodrama Carol. Blanchett has had a fairly uneventful run in films since 2015, but is still attached to a biopic of Lucille Ball from Aaron Sorkin. Given her facility and achievement within the genre to date, there is a pretty solid chance she'll nail the role if it ever gets made. Below a clip of Blanchett from Elizabeth narrowly avoiding an assasination attempt :
Blacnhett's acting is just made to play real-life characters it seems. I would say it also helps that she's probably one of the big producers choice to play real-life people, no matter their nationality. You mentioned Truth, I actually saw that years and years ago at Catamount Arts. I enjoyed it somewhat, but I can't say it's one of the best "real life story movies", that Blanchett has been involved with. I much prefer The Aviator, and her portrayal of Katherine Hepburn, which used to get too much hate in the old IMDb days (Stephen in particular seemed to have a bone to pick with it), but I'd say that her role as the more feminine looking Bob Dylan in I'm Not Truth was probably the most impressive role of the bunch. I think people forget that she got an Oscar nomination for it, the same year she was nominated for Elizabeth: The Golden Age, which makes her last actress / performer to be double-nominated to date. It's actually an inspiring nomination for the academy, she manages to get down Bob Dylan's "quirks" down, without even really looking the part. I will admit that I'm a bit skeptical of her playing Lucille Ball, however she could definitely surprise me. That movie also seems to be in development hell, however, considering it's been years since they announced the project, and nothing seems to have come of it yet.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 5, 2019 17:43:17 GMT
Cate BlanchettGenre: BiopicWe've already covered Australia's Greatest Actress, Nicole Kidman (at least according to denizens of this site on a thread about the subject, but probably a widely held view in other circles as well) in a different genre. So it's good to get round to her fellow Australian peer, someone who runs her close for the distinction of Australia's greatest actress and fellow GOAT contender, Cate Blanchett in a genre that really plays to Blanchett's strengths (mimicry, technical precision). Blanchett, a trained and accomplished stage actress truly burst onto the international scene with Elizabeth, giving a stunning performance as the legendary British monarch that put the film world on notice that a future great had arrived. Blanchett displayed a screen presence and command that would make her ideal to play women of strength, authority and determination. Many felt she should have won the Oscar for Elizabeth (she lost Best Actress to Gwyneth Paltrow in Shakespeare In Love) . Blanchett later got nominated for repeating the role of Elizabeth in the poorly reviewed sequel The Golden Age, possibly in part because the loss for the first film still stung many. Once Blanchett announced herself and her skill-set, getting her into more Biopics as strong, determined women only made sense. So she was cast as mould breaking movie icon Katharine Hepburn in Martin Scorsese's The Aviator. Full disclosure.... I'm not a big fan of Blanchett's turn as Hepburn and felt it relied too much on surface level mimicry.....But what I think doesn't really matter, as it was enough for Blanchett to win her first Oscar. Blanchett then went on to impersonate Bob Dylan in Todd Haynes somewhat gimmicky and experimental film I'm Not There, which saw 6 actors play different aspects of Dylan. In her most recent biopic role the 2015 film Truth, Blanchett played 60 Minutes producer Mary Mapes in a film and performance that was somewhat overlooked and overshadowed by her other film that year, the period melodrama Carol. Blanchett has had a fairly uneventful run in films since 2015, but is still attached to a biopic of Lucille Ball from Aaron Sorkin. Given her facility and achievement within the genre to date, there is a pretty solid chance she'll nail the role if it ever gets made. Below a clip of Blanchett from Elizabeth narrowly avoiding an assasination attempt :
I will admit that I'm a bit skeptical of her playing Lucille Ball, however she could definitely surprise me. That movie also seems to be in development hell, however, considering it's been years since they announced the project, and nothing seems to have come of it yet. I feel like both Cate Blanchett and Kate Winslet got caught unawares by the shifts in the industry which has seen the top actresses in middle age becoming major producers of their own work to stay ahead in the game. Not only Nicole Kidman, but Reese Witherspoon, Charlize Theron etc. Even the younger ones like Margot Robbie are at it! I feel like maybe Blanchett and Winslet felt cushioned by having more Oscar nods than their peer group, and sort of waited for the great offers to roll in (Winslet in particular has been in a major rut). And it didn't quite work out that way in the last few years. Hence Blanchett still being attached to the Lucille Ball project, which she probably expected to be made years ago. Blanchett defintely seems to have learned from watching Kidman, Witherspoon et al advance their careers this way, and is now becoming a very active producer, co-creating a new TV series called Stateless, which she will also act in, and executive producing another TV limited series, Mrs America (her next biopic role actually, as real life conservative campaigner Phylis Schalfly), which she stars in, surrounded by a very talented cast. She's following her peers into major league producing and prestige television.
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 5, 2019 18:06:50 GMT
I will admit that I'm a bit skeptical of her playing Lucille Ball, however she could definitely surprise me. That movie also seems to be in development hell, however, considering it's been years since they announced the project, and nothing seems to have come of it yet. I feel like both Cate Blanchett and Kate Winslet got caught unawares by the shifts in the industry which has seen the top actresses in middle age becoming major producers of their own work to stay ahead in the game. Not only Nicole Kidman, but Reese Witherspoon, Charlize Theron etc. Even the younger ones like Margot Robbie are at it! I feel like maybe Blanchett and Winslet felt cushioned by having more Oscar nods than their peer group, and sort of waited for the great offers to roll in (Winslet in particular has been in a major rut). And it didn't quite work out that way in the last few years. Hence Blanchett still being attached to the Lucille Ball project, which she probably expected to be made years ago. Blanchett defintely seems to have learned from watching Kidman, Witherspoon et al advance their careers this way, and is now becoming a very active producer, co-creating a new TV series called Stateless, which she will also act in, and executive producing another TV limited series, Mrs America (her next biopic role actually, as real life conservative campaigner Phylis Schalfly), which she stars in, surrounded by a very talented cast. She's following her peers into major league producing and prestige television. I think the difference is, is that Winslet has been struggling to get great films after her Oscar win which is why she just joined the newest Wes Anderson film. If you look at Blanchett's roles in the past few years, they've been a lot more mainstream and audience friendly, post Carol, she's done Thor Ragnarok, The House With The Clock in The Walls, and Ocean's Eight. I think a lot of that probably has to do with the fact that she realizes she just can't be chasing unconventional projects again and again, she needs to mix-in the biopics with the "crowd-pleasing", and she's usually very smart with her career choices, even the bigger budgeted stuff. Becoming her own producer is definitely a great way to get good roles after turning 50. Many actresses struggle by that age, and turning to prestige TV can only help. I actually think based on what I've read that Stateless sounds very promising, and a role tailor made for Blanchett.
|
|
|
Post by fiosnasiob on Aug 5, 2019 19:32:36 GMT
Chow Yun-Fat
Genre: Hong Kong Cinema (Crime/Action)Chow has been one of the world's great movie stars since the 1980's. Quentin Tarantino built his early career ripping off (sorry, "homaging") movies carried by Chow ( City On Fire, directed by Ringo Lam and starring Chow, was famously heavily cribbed by Tarantino, plot and everything, for Resevoir Dogs. Tarantino rightly banked that Hollywood and most western audiences would have no clue that he was pretty much taking a Hong Kong film, remaking it wholesale and passing it off as an original product). Anyways, moving on from the Magpie tendencies of Tarantino, Chow built a huge reputation in Hong Kong movies throughout the 1980's and 1990's. Equally adept at comedy and drama, Chow had an effortless charisma that has seen him compared to Western movie legends like Robert Mitchum. Like Mitchum, Chow is also a great and slightly underrated screen actor, perhaps because he makes it all look too easy. From films like The God Of Gamblers to A Better Tomorrow, Chow built up a reputation for effortless cool. His collaborations with director John Woo are probably what brought him to the attention of most western cinema audiences. Woo and Chow were a brilliant partnership. Like John Ford and John Wayne. They started with A Better Tomorrow, A Better Tomorrow 2, The Killer and Once A Thief. But it was arguably their work in action/crime classic Hard Boiled that really caught the attention of western audiences, with the iconic image of Chow holding a baby in one hand and a pump action shotgun in the other. It was gold, and Hollywood came calling for both men. Unsurprisingly, Hollywood has never utilised Chow as well as Hong Kong, but Chow has taken to the role of international movie star with all the grace and aplomb you'd expect. From easily holding his own with peak Jodie Foster in Anna And The King to leading the cast of Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon to global phenom status, Chow is one of the few Hong Kong/Chinese movie stars that is easily recognisable to Western audiences. And rightfully so. Below, the trailer for Hard Boiled:
Great and inevitable mention of the king of cool. Both, he (a mostly soap opera star) and John Woo (a mostly Wuxia, kung fu comedy director) truly found themselves to become one of the greatest and most iconic duo of the Action genre. But Chow Yun-Fat versatility is amazing, never out of the place whether it is in HK's (sometimes silly) comedy like The Diary of a Big Man or in more serious, dramatic roles, like in the early Johnnie To's All About Ah-Long or An Autumn's Tale (my fav of his non action role). It's a shame that Hollywood wasted his talents, you understand why HK's finest, Tony Leung Chiu-Wai never worked in Hollywood...until his recent casting as a future Marvel villain.. With Tony Leung ka-Fai in Prison on Fire.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 5, 2019 20:17:02 GMT
Chow Yun-Fat
Genre: Hong Kong Cinema (Crime/Action)Chow has been one of the world's great movie stars since the 1980's. Quentin Tarantino built his early career ripping off (sorry, "homaging") movies carried by Chow ( City On Fire, directed by Ringo Lam and starring Chow, was famously heavily cribbed by Tarantino, plot and everything, for Resevoir Dogs. Tarantino rightly banked that Hollywood and most western audiences would have no clue that he was pretty much taking a Hong Kong film, remaking it wholesale and passing it off as an original product). Anyways, moving on from the Magpie tendencies of Tarantino, Chow built a huge reputation in Hong Kong movies throughout the 1980's and 1990's. Equally adept at comedy and drama, Chow had an effortless charisma that has seen him compared to Western movie legends like Robert Mitchum. Like Mitchum, Chow is also a great and slightly underrated screen actor, perhaps because he makes it all look too easy. From films like The God Of Gamblers to A Better Tomorrow, Chow built up a reputation for effortless cool. His collaborations with director John Woo are probably what brought him to the attention of most western cinema audiences. Woo and Chow were a brilliant partnership. Like John Ford and John Wayne. They started with A Better Tomorrow, A Better Tomorrow 2, The Killer and Once A Thief. But it was arguably their work in action/crime classic Hard Boiled that really caught the attention of western audiences, with the iconic image of Chow holding a baby in one hand and a pump action shotgun in the other. It was gold, and Hollywood came calling for both men. Unsurprisingly, Hollywood has never utilised Chow as well as Hong Kong, but Chow has taken to the role of international movie star with all the grace and aplomb you'd expect. From easily holding his own with peak Jodie Foster in Anna And The King to leading the cast of Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon to global phenom status, Chow is one of the few Hong Kong/Chinese movie stars that is easily recognisable to Western audiences. And rightfully so. Below, the trailer for Hard Boiled:
Great and inevitable mention of the king of cool. Both, he (a mostly soap opera star) and John Woo (a mostly Wuxia, kung fu comedy director) truly found themselves to become one of the greatest and most iconic duo of the Action genre. But Chow Yun-Fat versatility is amazing, never out of the place whether it is in HK's (sometimes silly) comedy like The Diary of a Big Man or in more serious, dramatic roles, like in the early Johnnie To's All About Ah-Long or An Autumn's Tale (my fav of his non action role). It's a shame that Hollywood wasted his talents, you understand why HK's finest, Tony Leung Chiu-Wai never worked in Hollywood...until his recent casting as a future Marvel villain.. With Tony Leung ka-Fai in Prison on Fire. Tony Leung probably made the right decision to avoid Hollywood. Maybe he might get a few bigger paydays, but probably not any good roles. Hopefully Marvel does right by him.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 6, 2019 2:03:46 GMT
Now that we are done for the day acting as a feeder thread for ideas and content for less original and inspired threads, let's get back to business:
John Candy
Genre: Comedy
A while back, we sort of posited that Eddie Murphy, Steve Martin and Bill Murray might be the trumvirate of comic actors that represented the best of that golden age of film comedy in the 1980's. But you kind of have to consider John Candy, because the man was special.
For me, Candy was one of the few "fat" comic actors, where his weight wasn't the focal source of his humor (unlike say, Chris Farley). Candy was simply a very funny man and a very fine actor who happened to be overweight. Yes his size would sometimes be referenced to sell a joke, but it wasn't usually some lazy sight gag for a fat joke. Candy relied on his superb comic timing and strong acting ability to force his way into an extremely stacked pantheon of among the greatest 80's comic actors.
Candy started out the 80's as a sort of sidekick or second bannana in films like Splash and Brewsters Millions. I feel like his turn as Barf in Spaceballs ( a Chewbacca spoof) kind of got audiences primed to see him in more lead parts, and he started delivering in the late 80's. One cclassic after another. Planes, Trains And Automobiles, The Great Outdoors and my personal favorite, Uncle Buck. It was a very short peak as a lead comic actor, but a terrific one. Unfortunately, Candy passed away in 1994, before he could continue to fulfil that promise. Below, Caindy as Uncle Buck unable to ignore the wart on the face of a teacher he is meeting. It's very funny and Candy sells the humour in his facial expressions and delivery of his lines.
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 6, 2019 16:52:29 GMT
Now that we are done for the day acting as a feeder thread for ideas and content for less original and inspired threads, let's get back to business: John CandyGenre: ComedyA while back, we sort of posited that Eddie Murphy, Steve Martin and Bill Murray might be the trumvirate of comic actors that represented the best of that golden age of film comedy in the 1980's. But you kind of have to consider John Candy, because the man was special. For me, Candy was one of the few "fat" comic actors, where his weight wasn't the focal source of his humor (unlike say, Chris Farley). Candy was simply a very funny man and a very fine actor who happened to be overweight. Yes his size would sometimes be referenced to sell a joke, but it wasn't usually some lazy sight gag for a fat joke. Candy relied on his superb comic timing and strong acting ability to force his way into an extremely stacked pantheon of among the greatest 80's comic actors. Candy started out the 80's as a sort of sidekick or second bannana in films like Splash and Brewsters Millions. I feel like his turn as Barf in Spaceballs ( a Chewbacca spoof) kind of got audiences primed to see him in more lead parts, and he started delivering in the late 80's. One cclassic after another. Planes, Trains And Automobiles, The Great Outdoors and my personal favorite, Uncle Buck. It was a very short peak as a lead comic actor, but a terrific one. Unfortunately, Candy passed away in 1994, before he could continue to fulfil that promise. Below, Caindy as Uncle Buck unable to ignore the wart on the face of a teacher he is meeting . It's very funny and Candy sells the humour in his facial expressions and delivery of his lines. Great post. Even though I was very very young when he was past, Candy is a particular favorite of mine. Like a lot of comedians, he could be misused and he made some bad movies (I don't see anybody for going to bat for Wagons East, the movie that tragically took his life, but what I do know), but he always an appealing presence on screen. Candy is basically one of those actors that almost seems impossible to hate, maybe it's the Canadianness in him, but many of his films like Delirious or Planes, Trains and Automobiles are prominently sold on the idea of him being a "hapless happy guy". The late John Hughes was the director and writer, who really knew how to use Candy best, by not relying on his weight, and instead giving him a lot more "personal comedy". Hughes and Candy worked together on seven different projects, beginning with National Lampoon Vacation, and included movies like Home Alone, where Candy showed up in a memorable small part, mostly as a favorite to Hughes. Some people even credit Candy's death as being the main catalyst for being what led Hughes to stop directing films after 1991. Candy also moved into more dramatic roles by the end of his career, such as his great scene in JFK, or his role in Cool Runnings, which I actually rewatched a few weeks back. I was reminded of how good of an actor he could actually be, especially during his big speech between him and the coaches. He's got energy, and he's as personable as can get. My favorite less-discussed John Candy movie however, would probably be Only The Lonely, which gives him what might have been his best role ever, as a romantic comedy lead. The movie was directed by Chris Columbus, coming off the success of Home Alone ( Macaulay Culkin even has a small part in it as Candy's son), and Candy has great repertoire between everyone in the cast, especially Maureen O'Hara, who came out of retirement at the time to play his demanding mother. The script is pretty solid, but it's really Candy who sells it is. He's perfect as the hard-working but nice cop. I can't find any good clips right now, but I do highly recommend checking out the movie. It's an underseen gem.
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 6, 2019 19:11:26 GMT
Mel Brooks Genre: Parody Comedies
Now here’s somebody who could definitely fit into the "Great directors and their impact on a genre" thread, but here I wanted to focus on Mel Brooks as an actor / performer, as the majority of films that Mel acted in were of the parody sorts. Starting his career as a writer for a variety programs, Mel Brooks very soon gained a name for himself after winning the best original screenplay for The Producers, however Brooks did not really gain popularity until the release of two massive movies in the same year, which happened to be among my favorites, Blazing Saddles, and Young Frankenstein. The first of course was a classic satire of westerns along with a brilliant parody of race, and the later was a loving homage to old black and white horror movies, it might honestly be the last traditional B&W movie ever made too.
Brooks followed these two massively successful films up with more financially successful parodies, the majority of which I think get a bad rap. Silent Movie was his tribute to (duh), old silent movies, High Anxiety was a fun parody of Hitchcock films, History of The World Part 1 was both a skit movie as well as a homage to biblical epics, and of course Spaceballs was his out of the world take on Star Wars.
Now what I love most about Brooks’s work, is that with his few exceptions, you can really feel his love for the source material. Most directors wouldn’t go out of their way to find the old cameraman and technician, who worked on the old universal horror movies, so they could film a movie the old way, and yet Brooks did that. Similarly only a director like Mel Brooks in his prime, could make a movie that almost entirely devoid of dialogue outside of Marcel Marceau’s “noun!” gag, and have it be released by a major studio, and do it as well as it did.
Of course Brooks’s later movies were not up to snuff. While Spaceballs felt like a common ground between silly Brooks and “hip Brooks”, Robin Hood: Men in Tights took that to its nth degree. I still enjoy this movie to an extent, but I recognize that its comedy is a bit shall we say wobbly, and by that point Brooks seem to parodying films that were recent, as opposed to more “timeless and old”. Similarly while it also has its moments, including a memorably gory climax, Dracula: Dead & Loving It does feel quite stale, and despite featuring the spoofmeister himself Leslie Nielsen in the title role (now there’s a guy I could do write-up of, and it would kinda get depressing), has a feeling of “been there, done that!”
People often give Brooks crap for eventually taking the lead movies in his movies, when he should have stuck to parts like Governor Lepotomane in Blazing Saddles, and while I agree that a different lead (like say if Gene Wilder had not turned the lead in High Anxiety), could have made those movies different, I still think Brooks has an amicable presence to himself, that lent itself well enough to leading roles. He also has wonderful comic timing going for him as well.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 6, 2019 19:20:58 GMT
Now that we are done for the day acting as a feeder thread for ideas and content for less original and inspired threads, let's get back to business: John CandyGenre: ComedyA while back, we sort of posited that Eddie Murphy, Steve Martin and Bill Murray might be the trumvirate of comic actors that represented the best of that golden age of film comedy in the 1980's. But you kind of have to consider John Candy, because the man was special. For me, Candy was one of the few "fat" comic actors, where his weight wasn't the focal source of his humor (unlike say, Chris Farley). Candy was simply a very funny man and a very fine actor who happened to be overweight. Yes his size would sometimes be referenced to sell a joke, but it wasn't usually some lazy sight gag for a fat joke. Candy relied on his superb comic timing and strong acting ability to force his way into an extremely stacked pantheon of among the greatest 80's comic actors. Candy started out the 80's as a sort of sidekick or second bannana in films like Splash and Brewsters Millions. I feel like his turn as Barf in Spaceballs ( a Chewbacca spoof) kind of got audiences primed to see him in more lead parts, and he started delivering in the late 80's. One cclassic after another. Planes, Trains And Automobiles, The Great Outdoors and my personal favorite, Uncle Buck. It was a very short peak as a lead comic actor, but a terrific one. Unfortunately, Candy passed away in 1994, before he could continue to fulfil that promise. Below, Caindy as Uncle Buck unable to ignore the wart on the face of a teacher he is meeting . It's very funny and Candy sells the humour in his facial expressions and delivery of his lines. Great post. Even though I was very very young when he was past, Candy is a particular favorite of mine. Like a lot of comedians, he could be misused and he made some bad movies (I don't see anybody for going to bat for Wagons East, the movie that tragically took his life, but what I do know), but he always an appealing presence on screen. Candy is basically one of those actors that almost seems impossible to hate, maybe it's the Canadianness in him, but many of his films like Delirious or Planes, Trains and Automobiles are prominently sold on the idea of him being a "hapless happy guy". The late John Hughes was the director and writer, who really knew how to use Candy best, by not relying on his weight, and instead giving him a lot more "personal comedy". Hughes and Candy worked together on seven different projects, beginning with National Lampoon Vacation, and included movies like Home Alone, where Candy showed up in a memorable small part, mostly as a favorite to Hughes. Some people even credit Candy's death as being the main catalyst for being what led Hughes to stop directing films after 1991. Candy also moved into more dramatic roles by the end of his career, such as his great scene in JFK, or his role in Cool Runnings, which I actually rewatched a few weeks back. I was reminded of how good of an actor he could actually be, especially during his big speech between him and the coaches. He's got energy, and he's as personable as can get. My favorite less-discussed John Candy movie however, would probably be Only The Lonely, which gives him what might have been his best role ever, as a romantic comedy lead. The movie was directed by Chris Columbus, coming off the success of Home Alone ( Macaulay Culkin even has a small part in it as Candy's son), and Candy has great repertoire between everyone in the cast, especially Maureen O'Hara, who came out of retirement at the time to play his demanding mother. The script is pretty solid, but it's really Candy who sells it is. He's perfect as the hard-working but nice cop. I can't find any good clips right now, but I do highly recommend checking out the movie. It's an underseen gem. Nice summary. Yeah, Candy really stood out to me as a good actor. I could have seen him drift into even more challenging dramatic work had he not passed away. You are also right about John Hughes using him correctly. He saw a great comic actor and not just a "funny fat guy", which 90% of directors would have seen Candy as. Really got the best out of him. I have actually seen Only The Lonely, but it was so long ago now that it might almost feel like a new movie with a rewatch. I do remember liking it...and with a combination like Candy and Maureen O' Hara, two of the most likable movie stars who ever lived, I don't think disliking the film was ever a real option.
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Aug 6, 2019 19:25:54 GMT
Mel BrooksGenre: Parody Comedies Yeah, we should have done this before. It's obvious. We could have also covered him in the directors/ genre thread.
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Aug 6, 2019 19:37:05 GMT
Mel BrooksGenre: Parody Comedies Yeah, we should have done this before. It's obvious. We could have also covered him in the directors/ genre thread. Thanks. I actually considered doing a write-up of him in the directors thread, but decided to focus more on him as a performer. To me Brooks' spoof movies are exactly how you should do the "genre" right, none of this "just take anything that's currently popular, or might be popular", and that's the joke type attitude. You should actually write a decent story, and have the gags come from it.
|
|