|
|
Post by stephen on Mar 3, 2017 0:43:41 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2017 3:50:57 GMT
Jodorowsky should still make his version
|
|
|
|
Post by harlequinade on Mar 28, 2017 6:03:56 GMT
Rumor has it trailer drops tomorrow  |
|
|
|
Post by harlequinade on Apr 26, 2017 16:09:00 GMT
Now rumor has it the trailer is attached to Alien Covenant
|
|
|
|
Post by Sharbs on Apr 26, 2017 16:27:33 GMT
Now rumor has it the trailer is attached to Alien Covenant youre killing me |
|
|
|
Post by harlequinade on Apr 26, 2017 16:59:55 GMT
Now rumor has it the trailer is attached to Alien Covenant youre killing me It really seems to be happening this time  |
|
|
|
Post by harlequinade on May 4, 2017 15:02:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pavan on May 4, 2017 15:26:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on May 5, 2017 2:50:50 GMT
Really digging the poster. The background color is nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by getclutch on May 5, 2017 13:31:30 GMT
Love the poster. High hopes for this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by harlequinade on May 5, 2017 16:22:10 GMT
Told ya it was coming  |
|
|
|
Post by mikediastavrone96 on May 5, 2017 16:32:02 GMT
So, is Deckard still a replicant or nah?
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on May 5, 2017 16:38:27 GMT
So, is Deckard still a replicant or nah? I never subscribed to the "Deckard is a replicant" theory because it kinda defeats the purpose of the entire film, including the "tears in the rain" speech (the whole point of that speech is that it isn't one's origins that make someone who they are, but their experiences). The theory that Deckard is a replicant always felt like an attempt to add a twist where one wasn't needed. I hope that they don't address it one way or the other. |
|
|
|
Post by harlequinade on May 5, 2017 16:46:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by getclutch on May 5, 2017 16:57:47 GMT
So excited for Monday.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pavan on May 5, 2017 17:04:50 GMT
I'm ready
|
|
|
|
Post by Pavan on May 5, 2017 17:05:38 GMT
So, is Deckard still a replicant or nah? I never subscribed to the "Deckard is a replicant" theory because it kinda defeats the purpose of the entire film, including the "tears in the rain" speech (the whole point of that speech is that it isn't one's origins that make someone who they are, but their experiences). The theory that Deckard is a replicant always felt like an attempt to add a twist where one wasn't needed. I hope that they don't address it one way or the other.  |
|
