|
Post by mhynson27 on Oct 7, 2018 7:05:11 GMT
Thoughts? I mean it's probably one of the most mentioned films on here but still thought I should make a single thread for it. Just finished re-watching it for My Top 100 rankings and it really is freaking amazing. Everything just works, my #2 for the Coens. What's crazy to me is that it's only my #3 for 2007.
|
|
|
Post by alexanderblanchett on Oct 7, 2018 10:30:01 GMT
It aged well if you asked me. Its still relevant this year and a very solid Best Picture winner , containing some of the best performances of certain actors like Brolin, Jones and Bardem.
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on Oct 7, 2018 10:50:03 GMT
Well deserved Best Picture winner & definitely one of my favs of the 2000s (Zodiac is still my #1 of 2007 but No Country For Old Men is ranked right after it. Just a LOADED year for great films)
Bardem is one of the scariest / most memorable villains of all time in this and glad he got the Oscar for it. Honestly, I can't find a single flaw in this Coen bros' film . Its a damn masterpiece .
10/10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2018 17:01:56 GMT
It's a supreme masterpiece, and one of only like 2-3 times where I actually agree with the movie the Academy chose to award Best Picture. McCarthy's novel, which is occasionally too heavy handed for my taste, is perfected in this adaptation. The whole thing is just flawlessly done from start to finish. As far as I'm concerned this film blows its awards season rival There Will Be Blood out of the water.
Also pretty sure this was the first movie with a final scene that genuinely surprised me (hadn't read the book prior to initially seeing it, and I had no idea what to expect after the car crash). I was floored by how simultaneously abrupt and right it felt. I watched it with a friend and just kind of sat there in silence for a minute, a state I sometimes think of as the Ordet Effect.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Oct 7, 2018 17:15:29 GMT
One of the greatest Best Picture winners ever (in my book, eclipsed only by Amadeus and All Quiet on the Western Front, and more or less tied with Birdman in my Top 25 of all time). It's a remarkable exercise in minimalism, flawlessly transposing McCarthy's neo-Biblical style into the cinematic language, and wisely pruning it where necessary. Brolin brings a fantastic old-school swagger that would've made Gary Cooper envious. Bardem is harrowingly good at playing the physical embodiment of doom, acting as more of an act of God (or fate) rather than a human being. Tommy Lee Jones perfectly encapsulates the film's ethos of the old days of good guy/bad guy being obliterated by the morally bankrupt era of corruption and greed. Macdonald (royally snubbed) is quietly heartbreaking, Harrelson magnificent, Dillahunt hilarious, Root, Grant and Gene Jones excellent one-scene wonders, etc. Deakins's work is top-shelf, even better than his Jesse James showboating, and the Coens' expert use at using sound effects in lieu of score amps the tension to staggering proportions.
I still opt for There Will Be Blood as the better film, but how fucking great is it to have two dizzying masterworks come out the same year and by definition, become so inextricably linked to one another? I have said before that Daniel Plainview is the embodiment of the themes of No Country all in one single character, showing that Ed Tom's even more naive than we think because the start of that moral decay started far, far earlier than the entrance of hard drugs into the world.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Oct 7, 2018 17:19:07 GMT
It's the Coen's best which is really saying something and in the last 30 years - say post Apocalypse Now it is on the shortlist of greatest American films too.
Not only is it a masterpiece of content, it's a masterpiece of form too (ie how you stop seeing certain things after a certain point, you stop seeing any of the murders happen etc). In that way it dovetails thematically and has ghostly overtones too - much of it is like a dream the spectre of Death looms over everything which of course ties into the ending scene. The screenplay is a marvel and actually tightens and improves on its great book.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Oct 7, 2018 17:28:21 GMT
It's the Coen's best which is really saying something and in the last 30 years - say post Apocalypse Now it is on the shortlist of greatest American films too. Not only is it a masterpiece of content, it's a masterpiece of form too (ie how you stop seeing certain things after a certain point, you stop seeing any of the murders happen etc). In that way it dovetails thematically and has ghostly overtones too - much of it is like a dream the spectre of Death looms over everything which of course ties into the ending scene. The screenplay is a marvel and actually tightens and improves on its great book. I still think Barton Fink is their best film, if only because it feels like their most personal film and it takes so many of their cinematic inspirations and perfectly remixes them while giving it that distinct Coen flavor, and to think that it was their palate cleanser after they hit a roadblock in writing Miller's Crossing staggers me even more. No Country is certainly their "most important" movie, and probably has the Coens operating at their absolute zenith, but Fink just edges it out by a hair. One thing I admire the Coens for is that the final product shows them even pruning their own adaptation of McCarthy from the script. In the scene where Chigurh kills the man who hired Wells and he asks the accountant if he sees him, the script has the accountant nervously replying, "...No?" For me, that added line tips the hand a bit too far, implying that it is the correct answer. But does Chigurh reward him for that, or would he reward him for honesty (as Chigurh is actually the most moral character in the entire film, despite being a coldblooded assassin)? By cutting that one word and leaving it on that silent (except for Beth Grant's dialogue leading into the next scene) extended shot of the accountant and Chigurh staring at each other, it adds so much weight and doom to the exchange.
|
|
|
Post by JangoB on Oct 7, 2018 17:56:05 GMT
It's a perfect piece of cinema.
|
|
|
Post by countjohn on Oct 7, 2018 18:39:33 GMT
This is one of those movies that's been so acclaimed and talked about that there's not much to really say anymore. Very good movie, all time great performance from Bardem. I'm not the biggest fan of the ending, not that I wanted a big action finale, I'm just not a fan of movies that sort of just stop rather than end. But other than that it's pretty much perfect.
I also slightly prefer There Will Be Blood, maybe because it "sticks the landing" so to speak. But it's still a fine BP winner and the best one we've had for a long time. It and LOTR are the only recent BP winners that really feel like classics.
|
|
|
Post by mrimpossible on Oct 7, 2018 20:06:04 GMT
One of the greatest Best Picture winners ever (in my book, eclipsed only by Amadeus and All Quiet on the Western Front, and more or less tied with Birdman in my Top 25 of all time). It's a remarkable exercise in minimalism, flawlessly transposing McCarthy's neo-Biblical style into the cinematic language, and wisely pruning it where necessary. Brolin brings a fantastic old-school swagger that would've made Gary Cooper envious. Bardem is harrowingly good at playing the physical embodiment of doom, acting as more of an act of God (or fate) rather than a human being. Tommy Lee Jones perfectly encapsulates the film's ethos of the old days of good guy/bad guy being obliterated by the morally bankrupt era of corruption and greed. Macdonald (royally snubbed) is quietly heartbreaking, Harrelson magnificent, Dillahunt hilarious, Root, Grant and Gene Jones excellent one-scene wonders, etc. Deakins's work is top-shelf, even better than his Jesse James showboating, and the Coens' expert use at using sound effects in lieu of score amps the tension to staggering proportions. I still opt for There Will Be Blood as the better film, but how fucking great is it to have two dizzying masterworks come out the same year and by definition, become so inextricably linked to one another? I have said before that Daniel Plainview is the embodiment of the themes of No Country all in one single character, showing that Ed Tom's even more naive than we think because the start of that moral decay started far, far earlier than the entrance of hard drugs into the world. We were spoiled in 2007. NCFOM is my #1 of that year but TWBB would have easily been my #1 in any other year so far this millennium.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Oct 7, 2018 21:22:22 GMT
One of the greatest Best Picture winners ever (in my book, eclipsed only by Amadeus and All Quiet on the Western Front, and more or less tied with Birdman in my Top 25 of all time). It's a remarkable exercise in minimalism, flawlessly transposing McCarthy's neo-Biblical style into the cinematic language, and wisely pruning it where necessary. Brolin brings a fantastic old-school swagger that would've made Gary Cooper envious. Bardem is harrowingly good at playing the physical embodiment of doom, acting as more of an act of God (or fate) rather than a human being. Tommy Lee Jones perfectly encapsulates the film's ethos of the old days of good guy/bad guy being obliterated by the morally bankrupt era of corruption and greed. Macdonald (royally snubbed) is quietly heartbreaking, Harrelson magnificent, Dillahunt hilarious, Root, Grant and Gene Jones excellent one-scene wonders, etc. Deakins's work is top-shelf, even better than his Jesse James showboating, and the Coens' expert use at using sound effects in lieu of score amps the tension to staggering proportions. I still opt for There Will Be Blood as the better film, but how fucking great is it to have two dizzying masterworks come out the same year and by definition, become so inextricably linked to one another? I have said before that Daniel Plainview is the embodiment of the themes of No Country all in one single character, showing that Ed Tom's even more naive than we think because the start of that moral decay started far, far earlier than the entrance of hard drugs into the world. We were spoiled in 2007. NCFOM is my #1 of that year but TWBB would have easily been my #1 in any other year so far this millennium. Spoiled indeed. Assassination of Jesse James is right in that tier as well (my #2 personally), not to mention other great movies such as Eastern Promises, Michael Clayton, Gone Baby Gone, Into the Wild, Lars and the Real Girl, etc...
|
|
|
Post by mrimpossible on Oct 7, 2018 21:27:10 GMT
We were spoiled in 2007. NCFOM is my #1 of that year but TWBB would have easily been my #1 in any other year so far this millennium. Spoiled indeed. Assassination of Jesse James is right in that tier as well (my #2 personally), not to mention other great movies such as Eastern Promises, Michael Clayton, Gone Baby Gone, Into the Wild, Lars and the Real Girl, etc... Atonement and The Diving Bell and the Butterfly are some of my other favorites that year.
|
|
Film Socialism
Based
99.9999% of rock is crap
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 1,389
|
Post by Film Socialism on Oct 7, 2018 21:29:44 GMT
it's solid, barely makes my top 10 of the year. it kinda swapped w TWBB and how i feel about that, where i think that one is pretty considerably overrated now and this one grew on me. love the pacing.
|
|
Film Socialism
Based
99.9999% of rock is crap
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 1,389
|
Post by Film Socialism on Oct 7, 2018 21:34:12 GMT
it's solid, barely makes my top 10 of the year. it kinda swapped w TWBB and how i feel about that, where i think that one is pretty considerably overrated now and this one grew on me. love the pacing.
|
|
AKenjiB
Badass
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 653
|
Post by AKenjiB on Oct 7, 2018 23:14:38 GMT
My favorite Best Picture winner of the 21st century and my favorite Coen Brothers film. I don’t think I have much to add that hasn’t been said by others, but I love it from beginning to end. It’s superbly acted, brutal, and frequently subverts expectations. 2007 brought three of my favorite films of all time: No Country for Old Men, There Will Be Blood, and Zodiac.
|
|
|
Post by moonman157 on Oct 7, 2018 23:19:53 GMT
Probably my fave Coen Brothers movie. It's a low standard of course but I'd say it's one of the best Best Picture winners that I've seen.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on Oct 8, 2018 14:19:06 GMT
It's a very, very good film. Still, it ain't even in my Top 5 of 2007, so I'm not in that it's an all-timer camp, but damn if it isn't a very, very good film.
|
|
|
Post by bob-coppola on Oct 8, 2018 15:02:05 GMT
It's one of the best BP winners of the century, but it's not my #1. I prefer There Will Be Blood, Atonement and Zodiac. What a year was 2007, so many GOATs in the frame of 12 months. This one is perfectly crafted movie, there's nothing bad to say, I just connected with those other three more.
|
|
no
Badass
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 423
|
Post by no on Oct 8, 2018 16:35:51 GMT
i'll have to give it a rewatch as I do not remember it being nearly the masterpiece people seem to claim it is
|
|
|
Post by Pavan on Oct 8, 2018 18:15:19 GMT
I didn't like it that much in my first viewing but it grew up on me after repeated viewings, now i pretty much love it.
|
|