|
Post by iheartamyadams on Aug 12, 2019 19:25:21 GMT
I don’t buy it as an awards contender, but it will probably be good and get Murphy GG and SAG noms. I think Best Actor and the Netflix slate is a bit too deep for something like this to pull through.
In a weaker year I think he’d have a legitimate shot, but were in one where about fifteen names would be surefire noms in most years, I’m skeptical. Best Actor is going to be brutal and unless this has BP chances, I won’t predict it.
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Aug 12, 2019 19:35:34 GMT
This looks good and quotable.
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Aug 12, 2019 19:35:54 GMT
I don’t buy it as an awards contender, but it will probably be good and get Murphy GG and SAG noms. I think Best Actor and the Netflix slate is a bit too deep for something like this to pull through. In a weaker year I think he’d have a legitimate shot, but were in one where about fifteen names would be surefire noms in most years, I’m skeptical. Best Actor is going to be brutal and unless this has BP chances, I won’t predict it. it's a biopic so....
|
|
Good God
Badass
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 1,937
|
Post by Good God on Aug 12, 2019 20:05:44 GMT
I can only see one of De Niro and Murphy being nominated. The last teaser for The Irishman made me a little skeptical of De Niro's nomination chances, but I still have a hard time imagining Murphy getting nominated over De Niro. But of course, a lot will depend on how the two movies will be received. That's another problem with Netflix, imo. They have tons of money, and they were able to campaign two films last year. Although I'm still not sure how much of that was because The Ballad of Buster Scruggs is from the Coen brothers and nominated for categories that Roma didn't get into, and how much of the success of it was due to Netflix alone. For the Oscar, I think they get two guys in at most, so I think Driver is one of those actors unless it's like a Blue Valentine situation where Johansson is able to be nominated because of the weaker category but Driver is snubbed; although, Marriage Story seems much stronger all around than Blue Valentine was. After that I think De Niro would have the best chance, and then Pryce and Murphy are on about the same level right under that. There's also Adam Sandler who could possibly be in the same boat as Murphy this award season in that they're both former SNL with a lot of bad movies, but also both capable of greatness too. Before this trailer, I was more confident in Murphy before because of the talent involved with Dolemite Is My Name vs. the Safdie Brothers who've never come close to Oscar, but I think Sandler's performance could be more transformative which I think would give him the edge. Damn, I forgot that Netflix had 4 major Lead Actor contenders. I still think The Irishman will be their primary push, and with good reason. It's their best shot yet at winning the big prize, given its insane pedigree, and what better way to announce their presence (or dominance) in Hollywood. They're obviously losing money with it, so it's clear they made it for pride and perception. To not go all out with it at the Oscars would be really stupid. And I think I'd agree that Driver is perhaps the most likely of the Netflix contenders. Pryce could be a contender for the win, even, if he gets nominated, but I think it's getting the nomination that would be the challenge (because I'm not sure the movie will be received well). So I'd more or less agree with your order: Driver > De Niro > Murphy ~ Pryce.
|
|
Good God
Badass
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 1,937
|
Post by Good God on Aug 12, 2019 20:13:06 GMT
I can only see one of De Niro and Murphy being nominated. The last teaser for The Irishman made me a little skeptical of De Niro's nomination chances, but I still have a hard time imagining Murphy getting nominated over De Niro. But of course, a lot will depend on how the two movies will be received. Perhaps I'm just pessimistic, but I have doubts that either can get in. Murphy's probably set for a Globe nod, but unless this gets rapturous attention, I don't know if I can see him get past that point. As for De Niro, my doubts in The Irishman are well-known, but I feel like the Academy isn't really big on "subdued De Niro." It's likely the supporting men are going to dominate the discussion (if even there is a discussion to be had). I still think Driver's going to be their big push (although I'm not yet convinced in his chances to win, unless it becomes a BP frontrunner), unless Adam Sandler comes out of nowhere ( Uncut Gems has a prime release date). I can see him getting a Dreamgirls-esque path, speaking of Murphy, and unlike Murphy he doesn't have the "difficult" rep to contend with. Like I said, I am a little skeptical about De Niro's chances, and I'd still put him over Murphy. So they could both definitely miss. I don't think there are any sure things in this category yet, because almost everybody seems to have factors working against them and there are a ton of potential contenders. As for Sandler, I'd be beyond shocked if he won. I think he's too much of a joke to just come in and win the first time he's in awards contention after all the junk he's done. We're not exactly talking about someone like McConaughey who did some good work before he started doing junk, and then started doing great work on a consistent basis until it culminated in a win. Literally all Sandler has as far as respected work goes is Punch-Drunk Love, and he got almost no traction for that. If you're just talking about him getting nominated, sure, he's got a shot, but I'd still put Murphy over him for now.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 12, 2019 20:15:11 GMT
Just realised this seems to have the same basic template as Hustle And Flow. That one was about a guy looking to self-finance his dreams about being a rapper. This one about a guy self-financing his dream to be a movie star.
Apt choice of director I guess.
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Aug 12, 2019 20:20:28 GMT
Murphy looks great in this. Already a shit ton better than DeNiro in The Irishman trailer (who looks like DeNiro doing a mobster performance, except doing it with his last 20 odd years of onscreen lethargy he's been bringing. He looks bored). I feel Scorsese's name and a lot of hopeful nostalgia for the days when DeNiro was brilliant in that type of thing are driving him right now, because I'm not feeling DeNiro based on his trailer, wheras Murphy looks like he's on amazing form. And Netflix do want Murphy to commit to those stand-up specials.... Looks like it has the right amount of funny moments, but with a lot of dramatic pathos about an underdog reaching for his dream. Along with the biopic aspect, I can see the Academy biting. Hope the reviews come through and Murphy seriously contends for the Oscar, because he deserves to have one before his career is done I know you love Murphy but wining an Oscar for this would be a very big surprise I think. Judging by the trailers, Murphy is doing here what he's been doing in his whole career. Nothing special, nothing extraordinary or out of his comfort zone. His A-game? Maybe in Dreamgirls. Maybe in Mr. Church (which I loved). Not in this one. I wish, but I don't see it happening. Of course Netflix will be pushing their 170 mil. Irishman for the Oscars, meaning De Niro. They'll probably push Driver (a front runner imo). But I don't see Murphy in there. As I said recently, it's much easier for them to campaign for one or two films in each category and give it all they got, rather than pushing 5-6 films at the same time and just hope they'll score some nods. With that in mind, Dolemite has to be a wonderful movie, very well received and Murphy doing his best work ever for this to win some Oscars.
|
|
|
Post by iheartamyadams on Aug 12, 2019 20:21:02 GMT
I don’t buy it as an awards contender, but it will probably be good and get Murphy GG and SAG noms. I think Best Actor and the Netflix slate is a bit too deep for something like this to pull through. In a weaker year I think he’d have a legitimate shot, but were in one where about fifteen names would be surefire noms in most years, I’m skeptical. Best Actor is going to be brutal and unless this has BP chances, I won’t predict it. it's a biopic so.... It’s not a showy transformation (or much of one at all from what I can tell) and it seems to have strong comedic leanings. These types don’t hit as consistently with the Academy.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Aug 12, 2019 20:34:28 GMT
Like I said, I am a little skeptical about De Niro's chances, and I'd still put him over Murphy. So they could both definitely miss. I don't think there are any sure things in this category yet, because almost everybody seems to have factors working against them and there are a ton of potential contenders. As for Sandler, I'd be beyond shocked if he won. I think he's too much of a joke to just come in and win the first time he's in awards contention after all the junk he's done. We're not exactly talking about someone like McConaughey who did some good work before he started doing junk, and then started doing great work on a consistent basis until it culminated in a win. Literally all Sandler has as far as respected work goes is Punch-Drunk Love, and he got almost no traction for that. If you're just talking about him getting nominated, sure, he's got a shot, but I'd still put Murphy over him for now. I wouldn't say I'd be predicting Sandler for the win. The Dreamgirls comparison was more for the "comic veteran finally getting awards consideration", and remember: Murphy didn't win that year. It still remains to be seen if the Safdies will transition to mainstream success, but the critics are going to be eyeing the Good Time follow-up mighty hard.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 12, 2019 20:39:12 GMT
Murphy looks great in this. Already a shit ton better than DeNiro in The Irishman trailer (who looks like DeNiro doing a mobster performance, except doing it with his last 20 odd years of onscreen lethargy he's been bringing. He looks bored). I feel Scorsese's name and a lot of hopeful nostalgia for the days when DeNiro was brilliant in that type of thing are driving him right now, because I'm not feeling DeNiro based on his trailer, wheras Murphy looks like he's on amazing form. And Netflix do want Murphy to commit to those stand-up specials.... Looks like it has the right amount of funny moments, but with a lot of dramatic pathos about an underdog reaching for his dream. Along with the biopic aspect, I can see the Academy biting. Hope the reviews come through and Murphy seriously contends for the Oscar, because he deserves to have one before his career is done I know you love Murphy but wining an Oscar for this would be a very big surprise I think. Judging by the trailers, Murphy is doing here what he's been doing in his whole career. Nothing special, nothing extraordinary or out of his comfort zone. His A-game? Maybe in Dreamgirls. Maybe in Mr. Church (which I loved). Not in this one. I wish, but I don't see it happening. Of course Netflix will be pushing their 170 mil. Irishman for the Oscars, meaning De Niro. They'll probably push Driver (a front runner imo). But I don't see Murphy in there. As I said recently, it's much easier for them to campaign for one or two films in each category and give it all they got, rather than pushing 5-6 films at the same time and just hope they'll score some nods. With that in mind, Dolemite has to be a wonderful movie, very well received and Murphy doing his best work ever for this to win some Oscars. Does Murphy need to transform into a horse or something? Acting isn't a magic trick. He doesn't need to be putting on a sad face for the whole movie to be doing something special.He looks fantastic here. Funny, dynamic, charismatic and also a little bit sad and wistful. It looks like a terrific performance by a living legend in a biopic who has never been honored by the Academy before, when he arguably should have been several times. If the reviews are there, and he campaigns well, there's enough incentive to award someone like him. It's hard to say whether a win is possible yet. The film needs to be reviewed. And Netflix aren't trying to pay Driver or even DeNiro 70 million to do a stand-up special. I wouldn't even doubt their willingness to campaign h in.
|
|
Good God
Badass
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 1,937
|
Post by Good God on Aug 12, 2019 20:46:39 GMT
Robert De Niro in a Scorsese movie after 24 years: "Meh, 20 years of onscreen lethargy, and he looks bored." Eddie Murphy in another comedy: "Living legend giving a terrific performance!"
Sure, pal. Maybe some people are better off keeping a count of message board thread views.
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Aug 12, 2019 20:52:32 GMT
I know you love Murphy but wining an Oscar for this would be a very big surprise I think. Judging by the trailers, Murphy is doing here what he's been doing in his whole career. Nothing special, nothing extraordinary or out of his comfort zone. His A-game? Maybe in Dreamgirls. Maybe in Mr. Church (which I loved). Not in this one. I wish, but I don't see it happening. Of course Netflix will be pushing their 170 mil. Irishman for the Oscars, meaning De Niro. They'll probably push Driver (a front runner imo). But I don't see Murphy in there. As I said recently, it's much easier for them to campaign for one or two films in each category and give it all they got, rather than pushing 5-6 films at the same time and just hope they'll score some nods. With that in mind, Dolemite has to be a wonderful movie, very well received and Murphy doing his best work ever for this to win some Oscars. Does Murphy need to transform into a horse or something? Acting isn't a magic trick. He doesn't need to be putting on a sad face for the whole movie to be doing something special.He looks fantastic here. Funny, dynamic, charismatic and also a little bit sad and wistful. It looks like a terrific performance by a living legend in a biopic who has never been honored by the Academy before, when he arguably should have been several times. If the reviews are there, and he campaigns well, there's enough incentive to award someone like him. It's hard to say whether a win is possible yet. The film needs to be reviewed. And Netflix aren't trying to pay Driver or even DeNiro 70 million to do a stand-up special. I wouldn't even doubt their willingness to campaign h in. Actually I disagree to almost everything... Living legend? Never was. As for Dolemite, looks to me more of a comedy. I'm gonna like it, I'm certain. But no Oscar material. Also Murphy has a bad rep for Netflix to push him for the Academy awards.
|
|
morton
Based
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2,954
|
Post by morton on Aug 12, 2019 20:58:46 GMT
That's another problem with Netflix, imo. They have tons of money, and they were able to campaign two films last year. Although I'm still not sure how much of that was because The Ballad of Buster Scruggs is from the Coen brothers and nominated for categories that Roma didn't get into, and how much of the success of it was due to Netflix alone. For the Oscar, I think they get two guys in at most, so I think Driver is one of those actors unless it's like a Blue Valentine situation where Johansson is able to be nominated because of the weaker category but Driver is snubbed; although, Marriage Story seems much stronger all around than Blue Valentine was. After that I think De Niro would have the best chance, and then Pryce and Murphy are on about the same level right under that. There's also Adam Sandler who could possibly be in the same boat as Murphy this award season in that they're both former SNL with a lot of bad movies, but also both capable of greatness too. Before this trailer, I was more confident in Murphy before because of the talent involved with Dolemite Is My Name vs. the Safdie Brothers who've never come close to Oscar, but I think Sandler's performance could be more transformative which I think would give him the edge. Damn, I forgot that Netflix had 4 major Lead Actor contenders. I still think The Irishman will be their primary push, and with good reason. It's their best shot yet at winning the big prize, given its insane pedigree, and what better way to announce their presence (or dominance) in Hollywood. They're obviously losing money with it, so it's clear they made it for pride and perception. To not go all out with it at the Oscars would be really stupid. And I think I'd agree that Driver is perhaps the most likely of the Netflix contenders. Pryce could be a contender for the win, even, if he gets nominated, but I think it's getting the nomination that would be the challenge (because I'm not sure the movie will be received well). So I'd more of less agree with your order: Driver > De Niro > Murphy ~ Pryce. Yeah, they would be stupid not too push The Irishman in any category that they can because of how much it cost them, and how it's the most anticipated film of the year just as Roma was last year, and that came very close to winning despite being in black and white and not in English. I agree with your ranking though. While I think De Niro has a good shot to be nominated just based on the fact that The Irishman is likely to get in for Best Picture, and usually Best Actor and Best Picture go together, at least at this point I'm not sure about him winning his third because I do think he could be overshadowed by his co-stars specifically Pacino and Pesci. I think that on paper at least Driver has the best shot of all the Netflix contenders to win because he'll also have The Report which he got good notices for already and Star Wars Episode IX all coming out about the same time. Plus Marriage Story seems like it will be nominated in Best Picture given the confidence that Netflix has in it, and could give Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, a run for its money in Original Screenplay. He also seems to be generally well liked in Hollywood as far as I know, and has won and been nominated across several different mediums. The only thing is that he's not playing a real life person, and his costar or costars could overshadow him. For the real life person thing though, aside from maybe Jonathan Pryce who will have his own struggles, I don't see a larger than life biopic role like Winston Churchill or Freddie Mercury which is very fortunate for Driver. I agree with you that Pryce is problem is just getting the nomination. I'm a bit concerned that I heard rumors that Netflix was going to take it to Venice too, which makes sense given the subject matter, and then they take The Laundromat instead. So maybe at best it's like a fourth or fifth priority for Netflix this year. I agree with TerryMontana that to me it makes more sense for Netflix to really push one or two films rather than trying to campaign for 5-6 films. I don't think Harvey back at his peak could balance that many films. I would say like 4 maybe, but I remember sometimes Miramax would have a partnership of some kind with another studio, so it's different than what Netflix is doing. Plus, love or hate his campaign style, but he probably would have got Netflix Best Picture nominations with Beasts of No Nation and Mudblood and maybe lead Roma to victory. Netflix seems to be getting better at it, but I'm still not 100% confident that they're going to be able to juggle so many films this year. I think that The Laundromat is okay for Streep in whichever category she goes into because she's Streep, and I don't really think they need to do too much beyond what it seems like they're doing now. So I see that being a high priority for Streep and maybe screenplay, but probably nothing else. Obviously they're going to spend even more on The Irishman because it's their best chance to win Best Picture, and they've already invested so much into it already. If Marriage Story does well on the festival circuit, I think it remains Netflix's second push. I think it will do well, but Baumbach doesn't have the best track record with televised awards, so maybe it ends up being received like most of his other films in which case I would imagine that Netflix would then move onto Dolemite Is My Name or The Two Popes. Of those two, I don't know which one I'd give the edge. More people will probably want to see the former, but the latter was written by the person who has written screenplays for 3 recent Best Actor winners.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 12, 2019 21:00:35 GMT
Does Murphy need to transform into a horse or something? Acting isn't a magic trick. He doesn't need to be putting on a sad face for the whole movie to be doing something special.He looks fantastic here. Funny, dynamic, charismatic and also a little bit sad and wistful. It looks like a terrific performance by a living legend in a biopic who has never been honored by the Academy before, when he arguably should have been several times. If the reviews are there, and he campaigns well, there's enough incentive to award someone like him. It's hard to say whether a win is possible yet. The film needs to be reviewed. And Netflix aren't trying to pay Driver or even DeNiro 70 million to do a stand-up special. I wouldn't even doubt their willingness to campaign h in. Actually I disagree to almost everything... Living legend? Never was. As for Dolemite, looks to me more of a comedy. I'm gonna like it, I'm certain. But no Oscar material. Also Murphy has a bad rep for Netflix to push him for the Academy awards. Eddie Murphy isn't a living legend? How is that even a remotely controversial assertion? He''s widely regarded as one of the greatest comedians and comic actors of all-time. Not of his generation. All-time. To other comedians and comic actors, he's a legend, and trust me, comics tend to be the hardest judges of other comics. As for the rest, guess we'll wait and see. I think the trailer was cut to sell the comedy more because it's Eddie Murphy, and they want to bring in fans of his comedy . But you can tell he'll have dramatic arcs to play as well.
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Aug 12, 2019 21:05:44 GMT
I know you love Murphy but wining an Oscar for this would be a very big surprise I think. Judging by the trailers, Murphy is doing here what he's been doing in his whole career. Nothing special, nothing extraordinary or out of his comfort zone. His A-game? Maybe in Dreamgirls. Maybe in Mr. Church (which I loved). Not in this one. I wish, but I don't see it happening. Of course Netflix will be pushing their 170 mil. Irishman for the Oscars, meaning De Niro. They'll probably push Driver (a front runner imo). But I don't see Murphy in there. As I said recently, it's much easier for them to campaign for one or two films in each category and give it all they got, rather than pushing 5-6 films at the same time and just hope they'll score some nods. With that in mind, Dolemite has to be a wonderful movie, very well received and Murphy doing his best work ever for this to win some Oscars. Does Murphy need to transform into a horse or something? Acting isn't a magic trick. He doesn't need to be putting on a sad face for the whole movie to be doing something special.He looks fantastic here. Funny, dynamic, charismatic and also a little bit sad and wistful. It looks like a terrific performance by a living legend in a biopic who has never been honored by the Academy before, when he arguably should have been several times. If the reviews are there, and he campaigns well, there's enough incentive to award someone like him. It's hard to say whether a win is possible yet. The film needs to be reviewed. And Netflix aren't trying to pay Driver or even DeNiro 70 million to do a stand-up special. I wouldn't even doubt their willingness to campaign h in. he should have scored nod for Bowfinger.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 12, 2019 21:10:15 GMT
Does Murphy need to transform into a horse or something? Acting isn't a magic trick. He doesn't need to be putting on a sad face for the whole movie to be doing something special.He looks fantastic here. Funny, dynamic, charismatic and also a little bit sad and wistful. It looks like a terrific performance by a living legend in a biopic who has never been honored by the Academy before, when he arguably should have been several times. If the reviews are there, and he campaigns well, there's enough incentive to award someone like him. It's hard to say whether a win is possible yet. The film needs to be reviewed. And Netflix aren't trying to pay Driver or even DeNiro 70 million to do a stand-up special. I wouldn't even doubt their willingness to campaign h in. he should have scored nod for Bowfinger. Bowfinger, Coming To America, The Nutty Professor, Beverly Hills Cop, Trading Places...If the Academy didn't have it's bias against comedy, he could (maybe should) have been nodded for all of the above...
|
|
|
Post by Viced on Aug 12, 2019 21:10:23 GMT
Robert De Niro in a Scorsese movie after 24 years: "Meh, 20 years of onscreen lethargy, and he looks bored." Eddie Murphy in another comedy: "Living legend giving a terrific performance!" Sure, pal. Maybe some people are better off keeping a count of message board thread views. Don't forget that Netflix will push Murphy more because they want to pay him $70 million for some stand-up specials while they're not offering fellow stand-up comedy legends Adam Driver and Robert De Niro similar deals.
|
|
morton
Based
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2,954
|
Post by morton on Aug 12, 2019 21:12:44 GMT
Robert De Niro in a Scorsese movie after 24 years: "Meh, 20 years of onscreen lethargy, and he looks bored." Eddie Murphy in another comedy: "Living legend giving a terrific performance!" Sure, pal. Maybe some people are better off keeping a count of message board thread views. Don't forget that Netflix will push Murphy more because they want to pay him $70 million for some stand-up specials while they're not offering fellow stand-up comedy legends Adam Driver and Robert De Niro similar deals. If the summary of it is true, in Annette, Adam Driver is playing a stand-up comedian, so maybe we'll have to do a poll after that finally comes out to see who gave the best performance as a stand-up comedian between De Niro, Driver, and Murphy.
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on Aug 12, 2019 21:14:06 GMT
Robert De Niro in a Scorsese movie after 24 years: "Meh, 20 years of onscreen lethargy, and he looks bored." Eddie Murphy in another comedy: "Living legend giving a terrific performance!" Sure, pal. Maybe some people are better off keeping a count of message board thread views. Don't forget that Netflix will push Murphy more because they want to pay him $70 million for some stand-up specials while they're not offering fellow stand-up comedy legends Adam Driver and Robert De Niro similar deals. I know Netflix is throwing around money like it's candy, but tell me they aren't paying a guy whose last hit was... Norbit... $70M.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Aug 12, 2019 21:20:45 GMT
Robert De Niro in a Scorsese movie after 24 years: "Meh, 20 years of onscreen lethargy, and he looks bored." Eddie Murphy in another comedy: "Living legend giving a terrific performance!" Sure, pal. Maybe some people are better off keeping a count of message board thread views. Don't forget that Netflix will push Murphy more because they want to pay him $70 million for some stand-up specials while they're not offering fellow stand-up comedy legends Adam Driver and Robert De Niro similar deals. Sorry, I couldn't follow these two posts so I've quoted them here and add in bold some random words to make it easier for me to follow. I really like when we do that now, that's how I found out Eddie Murphy is playing a horse in his new movie.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 12, 2019 21:22:08 GMT
Robert De Niro in a Scorsese movie after 24 years: "Meh, 20 years of onscreen lethargy, and he looks bored." Eddie Murphy in another comedy: "Living legend giving a terrific performance!" Sure, pal. Maybe some people are better off keeping a count of message board thread views. Don't forget that Netflix will push Murphy more because they want to pay him $70 million for some stand-up specials while they're not offering fellow stand-up comedy legends Adam Driver and Robert De Niro similar deals. I know you aren't a member of MENSA and I surely wouldn't overrate your intelligence, but you do realise how businesses work right? Incentives matter. Murphy is someone they are incentivised to make happy because of clear business opportunities that Driver and DeNiro don't provide. This ain't rocket science. No one is saying they won't push Driver or DeNiro, but I truly question the brain function of anyone who doesn't think Netflix being willing to pay Murphy that much, doesn't suggest they'll do what is neccesary to keep the man happy in the immediate future. Like run a strong Best Actor campaign. It's called an incentive.
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Aug 12, 2019 21:33:50 GMT
Actually I disagree to almost everything... Living legend? Never was. As for Dolemite, looks to me more of a comedy. I'm gonna like it, I'm certain. But no Oscar material. Also Murphy has a bad rep for Netflix to push him for the Academy awards. Eddie Murphy isn't a living legend? How is that even a remotely controversial assertion? He''s widely regarded as one of the greatest comedians and comic actors of all-time. Not of his generation. All-time. To other comedians and comic actors, he's a legend, and trust me, comics tend to be the hardest judges of other comics. As for the rest, guess we'll wait and see. I think the trailer was cut to sell the comedy more because it's Eddie Murphy, and they want to bring in fans of his comedy . But you can tell he'll have dramatic arcs to play as well. He's not a living legend and he's not one of the greatest comedians of all time. Maybe one of the greatest living comedians but not ever.
|
|
|
Post by Viced on Aug 12, 2019 21:40:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Aug 12, 2019 21:44:42 GMT
Someone has some work to do! Funny how people like fiosnasiob and urbanpatrician cared when they knew what was actually going on Ask the right questions next time. Context is key.
|
|
Good God
Badass
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 1,937
|
Post by Good God on Aug 12, 2019 22:09:01 GMT
you do realise how businesses work right? Incentives matter. Murphy is someone they are incentivised to make happy because of clear business opportunities that Driver and DeNiro don't provide. This ain't rocket science. No one is saying they won't push Driver or DeNiro, but I truly question the brain function of anyone who doesn't think Netflix being willing to pay Murphy that much, doesn't suggest they'll do what is neccesary to keep the man happy in the immediate future. Like run a strong Best Actor campaign. It's called an incentive. This is a dumb ass argument. Providing a strong Oscar campaign for Eddie Murphy and getting him an Oscar nomination isn't an incentive for Murphy to do a stand-up comedy special. Because there are no Oscars for stand-up comedy specials. Giving someone a strong Oscar campaign is an incentive for them to make more Oscar movies with you, because they then know you can make Oscar voters watch your movie and give you awards. What would be an incentive for Murphy is to give him a good money bonus if Dolemite does well (critically or otherwise) so he gets to make more money. Because Murphy's incentive to do the stand-up special is money, not awards. And the incentive for more top directors and top actors like Scorsese/De Niro/Pacino to make more movies with Netflix in the future would be to give them a strong awards campaign and win them awards, because then they would know that any future movies they make will get a strong awards push. If The Irishman wins Best Picture, a lot of other big directors and big actors would be a lot more willing to work with Netflix in the future, because they will have broken the glass ceiling. I think the word you're looking for is "goodwill". A strong Oscar campaign for Eddie Murphy will earn Netflix goodwill with Murphy.
|
|