dazed
Based
Posts: 2,645
Likes: 1,808
|
Post by dazed on May 21, 2019 23:47:52 GMT
This is getting raved across the board. A lot of notices saying that it’s his best since Pulp. I can’t wait.
|
|
|
Post by iheartamyadams on May 22, 2019 0:34:43 GMT
Jeff Wells "praise" for the supporting cast is as half-hearted as it gets. He lists everyone by name then proceeds to say,"they are all good and tasty as far as it goes, but this is totally Pitt's film...don"t even debate it". The big take away from Wells (If anyone is inclined to take anything away from him, and I'd understand if they choose not to ) is that Pitt is probably the biggest and maybe only awards season acting bet for this film. There remains possibilities for DiCaprio, but if Pitt gets the passion vote that seems likely based on what we are hearing so far, it may just be him. hollywood-elsewhere.com/2019/05/once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-is/#disqus_threadPitt and DiCaprio have nearly identical ink in the actual critic reviews. I did see a few MVP mentions for Pitt in the early tweets, but that really hasn’t been the case in the reviews I’m seeing and I’ve read them all. DiCaprio has great notices (Elwood actually thinks he has better chances for the lead nom and Lang said he’s easily the best thing about the film) and his role is pure SAG catnip. I’m surprised that you’re using Wells of all people to be dismissive of Leo’s chances. He’s probably getting nominated and I’d say it’s a near guarantee if they’re split up into different categories.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on May 22, 2019 0:51:27 GMT
Conversational tangents happen "dude". It was an interesting and relevant convo that spawned from the QT film's Oscar campaign possibilities and I think we've said what needed saying. No harm, no foul. If you want to move to conversation specifically back to QT/The movie/Leo/Pitt....the floor is yours. I know the concept of holding multiple conversations that can intersect is alien to you (and your equally dumb Sockpuppet aliases), but give it a go. You might surprise yourself. Asshole. I don't have socks here or anywhere! you always have tendency to derail threads/main topic to Your favourite actors and shits. Try to justify something that needn't to be justified. I don't give a shit dickhead. If conversational detours bother you so much, take it up with a mod. Or block me (It can be done). Problem solved.Bother me again when you have something interest ing to say. Damn near 9000 posts, and I can't recall a single thing you've ever said. Fucking clown.
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on May 22, 2019 0:56:53 GMT
Adam Sandler.
|
|
|
Post by Viced on May 22, 2019 0:57:39 GMT
I don't have socks here or anywhere! you always have tendency to derail threads/main topic to Your favourite actors and shits. Try to justify something that needn't to be justified. I don't give a shit dickhead. If conversational detours bother you so much, take it up with a mod. Or block me. Problem solved.Bother me again when you have something interest ing to say. Damn near 9000 posts, and I can't recall a single thing you've ever said. Fucking clown. take a chill pill, brah
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on May 22, 2019 1:01:35 GMT
I don't give a shit dickhead. If conversational detours bother you so much, take it up with a mod. Or block me. Problem solved.Bother me again when you have something interest ing to say. Damn near 9000 posts, and I can't recall a single thing you've ever said. Fucking clown. take a chill pill, brah My apologies. The guy came after me, and I reacted poorly and I should know better. But I still reiteratre, that he is free to block me if he dislikes my input. Should be an option for everyone.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on May 22, 2019 2:24:33 GMT
Jeff Wells "praise" for the supporting cast is as half-hearted as it gets. He lists everyone by name then proceeds to say,"they are all good and tasty as far as it goes, but this is totally Pitt's film...don"t even debate it". The big take away from Wells (If anyone is inclined to take anything away from him, and I'd understand if they choose not to ) is that Pitt is probably the biggest and maybe only awards season acting bet for this film. There remains possibilities for DiCaprio, but if Pitt gets the passion vote that seems likely based on what we are hearing so far, it may just be him. hollywood-elsewhere.com/2019/05/once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-is/#disqus_threadPitt and DiCaprio have nearly identical ink in the actual critic reviews. I did see a few MVP mentions for Pitt in the early tweets, but that really hasn’t been the case in the reviews I’m seeing and I’ve read them all. DiCaprio has great notices (Elwood actually thinks he has better chances for the lead nom and Lang said he’s easily the best thing about the film) and his role is pure SAG catnip. I’m surprised that you’re using Wells of all people to be dismissive of Leo’s chances. He’s probably getting nominated and I’d say it’s a near guarantee if they’re split up into different categories. I'd never use Jeff Wells as a final opinion on anything. He's very often a crank. But the guy is sometimes in tune with the mood of Hollywood (he was backing Green Book for BP till the bitter end, while most of the other awards bloggers were ripping it to shreds). As much as a lot of us would like to, we can't completely dismiss Wells. But the LA Times has also said it's Pitt's movie www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-cannes-quentin-tarantino-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-20190521-story.htmlAnd the social media reactions seem to give the edge to Pitt. I'm not ruling DiCaprio out at all. If he's lead, it depends on the strength of the race. But for now, Pitt feels like the likelier bet, imho.
|
|
|
Post by quetee on May 22, 2019 2:36:23 GMT
Pitt and DiCaprio have nearly identical ink in the actual critic reviews. I did see a few MVP mentions for Pitt in the early tweets, but that really hasn’t been the case in the reviews I’m seeing and I’ve read them all. DiCaprio has great notices (Elwood actually thinks he has better chances for the lead nom and Lang said he’s easily the best thing about the film) and his role is pure SAG catnip. I’m surprised that you’re using Wells of all people to be dismissive of Leo’s chances. He’s probably getting nominated and I’d say it’s a near guarantee if they’re split up into different categories. I'd never use Jeff Wells as a final opinion on anything. He's very often a crank. But the guy is sometimes in tune with the mood of Hollywood (he was backing Green Book for BP till the bitter end, while most of the other awards bloggers were ripping it to shreds). As much as a lot of us would like to, we can't completely dismiss Wells. But the LA Times has also said it's Pitt's movie www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-cannes-quentin-tarantino-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-20190521-story.htmlAnd the social media reactions seem to give the edge to Pitt. I'm not ruling DiCaprio out at all. If he's lead, it depends on the strength of the race. But for now, Pitt feels like the likelier bet, imho. I can't believe Wells liked the movie. I'm shooked.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on May 22, 2019 2:40:45 GMT
I'd never use Jeff Wells as a final opinion on anything. He's very often a crank. But the guy is sometimes in tune with the mood of Hollywood (he was backing Green Book for BP till the bitter end, while most of the other awards bloggers were ripping it to shreds). As much as a lot of us would like to, we can't completely dismiss Wells. But the LA Times has also said it's Pitt's movie www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-cannes-quentin-tarantino-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-20190521-story.htmlAnd the social media reactions seem to give the edge to Pitt. I'm not ruling DiCaprio out at all. If he's lead, it depends on the strength of the race. But for now, Pitt feels like the likelier bet, imho. I can't believe Wells liked the movie. I'm shooked. He'll probably turn on it in a few months, like he does most things by Spielberg and Tarantino. I think he's mainly happy to see something familiar and Hollywood in Cannes competition. The novelty will wear off for him when he gets home
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on May 22, 2019 2:51:37 GMT
^^^^ Sorry if I hurt your feelings with my comments. But I'm not changing how or what I post for you. And I'm not here to be your friend, or need you to agree with my opinions, or need you to like me. Like I said, I won't take it personally if you want to block me, as you don't enjoy my input. So you don't have to read my commentary if you don"t wish to.Viced can tell you how.
But if this happens again, to save you the trouble if you haven't already done it, I'll be doing the blocking.
|
|
|
Post by iheartamyadams on May 22, 2019 6:39:48 GMT
Pitt and DiCaprio have nearly identical ink in the actual critic reviews. I did see a few MVP mentions for Pitt in the early tweets, but that really hasn’t been the case in the reviews I’m seeing and I’ve read them all. DiCaprio has great notices (Elwood actually thinks he has better chances for the lead nom and Lang said he’s easily the best thing about the film) and his role is pure SAG catnip. I’m surprised that you’re using Wells of all people to be dismissive of Leo’s chances. He’s probably getting nominated and I’d say it’s a near guarantee if they’re split up into different categories. I'd never use Jeff Wells as a final opinion on anything. He's very often a crank. But the guy is sometimes in tune with the mood of Hollywood (he was backing Green Book for BP till the bitter end, while most of the other awards bloggers were ripping it to shreds). As much as a lot of us would like to, we can't completely dismiss Wells. But the LA Times has also said it's Pitt's movie www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-cannes-quentin-tarantino-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-20190521-story.htmlAnd the social media reactions seem to give the edge to Pitt. I'm not ruling DiCaprio out at all. If he's lead, it depends on the strength of the race. But for now, Pitt feels like the likelier bet, imho. I think they’ll be split up and not end up in the same category, in which case, the minor difference in the acclaim they’ve managed will be irrelevant. There’s internal competition and the fact that Pitt has another role (for which he cannot possibly go Supporting) in the mix, so I do think he will probably be Supporting for this. The role is supportive in nature, and he’s said to be more subtle, so it makes sense to me. Studios rarely ever do a dual lead thing for awards, and I don’t know that I see this happening here. DiCaprio has the ink, an industry friendly role and a strong film, so he’s in solid shape as far I’m concerned. In the event that they both run lead, then yeah, I’d bet on Pitt getting in first. That scenario would actually be most exciting to me, but I feel like it’s not going to happen. Aside from the review you posted it, the majority actually highlight how well they play off of each other and offer praise in pretty equal measure.
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on May 22, 2019 12:32:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on May 22, 2019 12:47:17 GMT
Well that's preposterous.
I wouldn't clap for 20 seconds after a cinema screening of Mulholland Dr. and that's my favourite frickin' film. Some people have too much time on their hands.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on May 22, 2019 12:52:12 GMT
So on the basis of the trailer the movie looks like a lot of fun. Still trailers are typically not too reflective of the quality of the final film.
Tarantino has made a lot of great films, and a few are among my all time favourites, but I am not allowing myself to be too hyped for this.
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on May 22, 2019 17:29:13 GMT
Well that's preposterous.
I wouldn't clap for 20 seconds after a cinema screening of Mulholland Dr. and that's my favourite frickin' film. Some people have too much time on their hands.
Yeah, I'll never understand the clapping for minutes straight. I do like a 5 second applause with a "woo!" thrown in and I feel like that is more than enough show of appreciation. Like, mother fucker I shit to do with these hands later in the day, I can't be all willy-nilly and clap for an eternity.
|
|
|
Post by Sharbs on May 22, 2019 18:18:19 GMT
Well that's preposterous.
I wouldn't clap for 20 seconds after a cinema screening of Mulholland Dr. and that's my favourite frickin' film. Some people have too much time on their hands.
Yeah, I'll never understand the clapping for minutes straight. I do like a 5 second applause with a "woo!" thrown in and I feel like that is more than enough show of appreciation. Like, mother fucker I shit to do with these hands later in the day, I can't be all willy-nilly and clap for an eternity. i don't ever clap. whenever an applause starts after a movie, I go "wait, is insert director in attendance?!?!?"
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on May 22, 2019 20:00:36 GMT
Yeah, I'll never understand the clapping for minutes straight. I do like a 5 second applause with a "woo!" thrown in and I feel like that is more than enough show of appreciation. Like, mother fucker I shit to do with these hands later in the day, I can't be all willy-nilly and clap for an eternity. i don't ever clap. whenever an applause starts after a movie, I go "wait, is insert director in attendance?!?!?" Yeah, same here. It just isn't the done thing in Ireland at least. At the end of the literally jam packed screening of Endgame I was at last month, one or two people tried to instigate a round of applause, but thankfully no one else joined in.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on May 23, 2019 1:31:51 GMT
i don't ever clap. whenever an applause starts after a movie, I go "wait, is insert director in attendance?!?!?" Yeah, same here. It just isn't the done thing in Ireland at least. At the end of the literally jam packed screening of Endgame I was at last month, one or two people tried to instigate a round of applause, but thankfully no one else joined in. Little different from a screening with Pitt, DiCaprio, Tarantino, and Robbie in attendance.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on May 23, 2019 6:00:44 GMT
Yeah, same here. It just isn't the done thing in Ireland at least. At the end of the literally jam packed screening of Endgame I was at last month, one or two people tried to instigate a round of applause, but thankfully no one else joined in. Little different from a screening with Pitt, DiCaprio, Tarantino, and Robbie in attendance. So it's just arse kissing, which is even worse.
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on May 23, 2019 6:15:51 GMT
Yeah, I'll never understand the clapping for minutes straight. I do like a 5 second applause with a "woo!" thrown in and I feel like that is more than enough show of appreciation. Like, mother fucker I shit to do with these hands later in the day, I can't be all willy-nilly and clap for an eternity. i don't ever clap. whenever an applause starts after a movie, I go "wait, is insert director in attendance?!?!?" Oh, I was just speaking on clapping in general... I HAVE clapped in theaters before, but that's rare... and again a nice 5 seconds with a woo.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on May 23, 2019 10:43:40 GMT
Madsen, Roth, James Marsden, Danny Strong, James Remar - all announced as being in the film were all missing from the final cut apparently........QT mention a scene in the Cannes press conference with the Dalton-Schwarz characters that was cut out as well (involving Rick Dalton going for the McQueen Great Escape role).
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on May 23, 2019 15:34:26 GMT
Madsen, Roth, James Marsden, Danny Strong, James Remar - all announced as being in the film were all missing from the final cut apparently........QT mention a scene in the Cannes press conference with the Dalton-Schwarz characters that was cut out as well (involving Rick Dalton going for the McQueen Great Escape role). So you're just assuming these guys are not in the final cut??? I want ALL of them to be in it, especially Madsen and Roth. And I want NO PACINO SCENE to be cut!!!!
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on May 23, 2019 15:43:32 GMT
Madsen, Roth, James Marsden, Danny Strong, James Remar - all announced as being in the film were all missing from the final cut apparently........QT mention a scene in the Cannes press conference with the Dalton-Schwarz characters that was cut out as well (involving Rick Dalton going for the McQueen Great Escape role). So you're just assuming these guys are not in the final cut??? I want ALL of them to be in it, especially Madsen and Roth. And I want NO PACINO SCENE to be cut!!!! Several sources have reported they are cut including this one though I guess we won't know for sure until its US release: www.esquire.com/uk/latest-news/a27566203/michael-madsen-and-tim-roth-were-both-cut-completely-from-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood/The Pacino-DiCaprio scene is from Tarantino's mouth in the press conference at Cannes. On the other hand, should be some good dvd extras
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on May 23, 2019 15:50:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by quetee on May 23, 2019 16:02:12 GMT
I'm sure what is being shown is not the final cut. A 20 min scene of Brad and Leo yelling spaghetti?
|
|