|
Post by hugobolso1 on Oct 12, 2018 11:35:27 GMT
It was surprise, was like Garbo talks!!!
Good 4 Melania, the hottest first lady in America history.-
The feminazis are angry
|
|
|
Post by Ryan_MYeah on Oct 12, 2018 17:59:40 GMT
Claims to be one of the most bullied people on the planet. Drastically oversimplifies providing evidence for such extreme claims.
?
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso1 on Oct 12, 2018 20:03:46 GMT
Yes she is, the President of the United States historically is the most bullied person in the world. Not usual, but sometimes his wife, the first lady, is also one of the most bullied women. That happened with most of the first ladies in the past 40 years, with the only exception of Laura Bush. No hard comment I read about her.-
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Oct 12, 2018 20:42:22 GMT
Why do people hate her so much ? Serious question .
|
|
LaraQ
Badass
English Rose
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 2,819
|
Post by LaraQ on Oct 12, 2018 21:13:10 GMT
Why do people hate her so much ? Serious question . They hate Trump(with good reason) and they hate her by association I guess.She's a hard woman to warm to.
|
|
|
Post by Ryan_MYeah on Oct 12, 2018 22:02:02 GMT
Why do people hate her so much ? Serious question . I don’t think anyone hates her (except the people who thrive off of being dickheads), but they are willing to call her out. She seems like the rational half of the couple, but I hardly think she’s the most enlightened public speaker, and this is a pretty definitive reason. Her reasoning is that serious allegations of assault require evidence, but it isn’t as easy as that. No one wears a wire out of anticipation of being raped or assaulted. Obviously I’m joking a bit, but that’s to the level of which she might be suggesting, and even if these cases are reported, how many perpetrators manage to walk away? But more importantly, her claims about bullying just feel disingenuous. First, she talks about needing evidence to make serious claims, but calls herself one of the most bullied persons with no base. Secondly, she should really be the next to last person to sound off about bullying, considering the constant insults, attacks, and mockery thrown out daily by her husband, one of the biggest bullies in the world who gets away with it, because he can hide behind his office and sycophantic cowards afraid of losing their jobs, and who coincidentally makes *constant* unbased claims and allegations without a shred of evidence Now, I’m not comfortable judging or condemning the lifestyle choices of a woman, I don’t try to make assumptions (assuming things that are wrong is Trump’s job), and she doesn’t strike me as an enabler. I doubt she agrees with many of those baseless claims her husband throws out, but she sure doesn’t seem to be doing anything to talk him down. I do not hate her, and I would never call her a bully or a bad person, but I am calling her a hypocrite.
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso1 on Oct 13, 2018 1:07:31 GMT
Why do people hate her so much ? Serious question . I don’t think anyone hates her (except the people who thrive off of being dickheads), but they are willing to call her out. She seems like the rational half of the couple, but I hardly think she’s the most enlightened public speaker, and this is a pretty definitive reason. Her reasoning is that serious allegations of assault require evidence, but it isn’t as easy as that. No one wears a wire out of anticipation of being raped or assaulted. Obviously I’m joking a bit, but that’s to the level of which she might be suggesting, and even if these cases are reported, how many perpetrators manage to walk away? But more importantly, her claims about bullying just feel disingenuous. First, she talks about needing evidence to make serious claims, but calls herself one of the most bullied persons with no base. Secondly, she should really be the next to last person to sound off about bullying, considering the constant insults, attacks, and mockery thrown out daily by her husband, one of the biggest bullies in the world who gets away with it, because he can hide behind his office and sycophantic cowards afraid of losing their jobs, and who coincidentally makes *constant* unbased claims and allegations without a shred of evidence Now, I’m not comfortable judging or condemning the lifestyle choices of a woman, I don’t try to make assumptions (assuming things that are wrong is Trump’s job), and she doesn’t strike me as an enabler. I doubt she agrees with many of those baseless claims her husband throws out, but she sure doesn’t seem to be doing anything to talk him down. I do not hate her, and I would never call her a bully or a bad person, but I am calling her a hypocrite. Not agree at all. You can proove several detalis.- Weinstein was discouvered because his modus operanti was the same, interview in hotel suites. Gotcha!!! The chase against the Judge, on the other hand was awful. Both were minor age, and she couldn't remember how she get in the room, not only but also the year!!! Also her daughter works 4 Soros. Not Guilty.
|
|
|
Post by Ryan_MYeah on Oct 13, 2018 1:51:29 GMT
Not agree at all. You can proove several detalis.- Weinstein was discouvered because his modus operanti was the same, interview in hotel suites. Gotcha!!! And it took how long, and how many sources and corroboration to finally unmask him for the cock he was? And not everyone has the resources of a Ronan Farrow article. Plenty of women each year are assaulted that can be debased with a few holes, and many of them are embarrassed or ashamed still to come forward. So her idea is oversimplifying the issue to almost insulting degrees. When I was six years old, I broke my arm. I don’t remember all minor details like what time and day it happened, why it happened, or what the trip to the hospital was like, only that I knew how it felt, how much it hurt me, and how much I struggled to cope with it. Obviously I’m not saying my broken arm is anything comparable to assault or rape or trauma, but when you’re in a situation of extreme hurt, you don’t pay a lot of attention to the minute details, but you do remember vividly the images and feelings you experienced. And she did lay out details, and there’s no proof he isn’t guilty yet. There’s no proof he is either, but that’s because no one cared to be thorough with it, even with dozens of witnesses offering to testify and possibly corroborate. Nothing has been proven. But again, this all goes back to the point that Melania Trump is drastically oversimplifying the issue. It’s messier with more loopholes than that, something which she doesn’t fully understand or comprehend.
|
|
cherry68
Based
Man is unhappy because he doesn't know he's happy. It's only that.
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 2,072
|
Post by cherry68 on Oct 13, 2018 6:31:42 GMT
Ryan_MYeahNot remembering what happened when you were 6 yo isn't the same as not remembering when you were 15. Anyway, I guess that Melania means that some women might be lying (seeking attention or whatever reason). Not all men are rapists even if a woman accuses them. She probably knows the harassment issue more than you, given she worked as a model.
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Oct 13, 2018 9:39:22 GMT
Why do people hate her so much ? Serious question . The dumbest question ever made in the history of the board, no wonder Thank you .I guess I was just trying to sink to your level of mediocrity , that's all .
|
|
|
Post by MsMovieStar on Oct 13, 2018 11:07:59 GMT
I don't see why people are so hard on her. She's only trying to fit in with the current victim narrative... As Ray pointed out she can hardly say, 'I'm beautiful, I'm rich, I have power by association, VIP status, and can do and have anything I want... so suck it up, bitches.'
I don't see why she can't claim to be oppressed by her wealth, bullied by her beauty, forced to endure special treatment wherever she goes... and having the whole world watching you all the time to make sure that you're not looking smug.
Can you imagine how awful it must be not being able to pop into Walmart to buy a shopping bag, but having to go to Gucci and ending up with something diamond encrusted, made of the finest Italian leather and probably with a solid gold fastener. Then to add insult to injury, they probably won't even take her money, 'I'm sorry, but we don't accept your money here... you're the First Lady... have it for free, just make sure you're photographed with it... Here, have all these shoes and belts as well. Poor Melania, while most of us only have to deal with a dozen pieces of high end haute couture in our lifetimes (and on loan or shoplifted) she's probably being buried in the stuff. It's really unfair to criticize her, until you've walked a red dignitaries' carpet in her Manolo Blahnik's. People just have no idea now uncomfortable they are, which is why I only wear Louboutins... even at the gym... but it's not about me (although it should be).
Special people deserve compassion as well, folks... it's not just for the poor and unfortunate.
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso1 on Oct 14, 2018 2:34:03 GMT
Not agree at all. You can proove several detalis.- Weinstein was discouvered because his modus operanti was the same, interview in hotel suites. Gotcha!!! And it took how long, and how many sources and corroboration to finally unmask him for the cock he was? And not everyone has the resources of a Ronan Farrow article. Plenty of women each year are assaulted that can be debased with a few holes, and many of them are embarrassed or ashamed still to come forward. So her idea is oversimplifying the issue to almost insulting degrees. When I was six years old, I broke my arm. I don’t remember all minor details like what time and day it happened, why it happened, or what the trip to the hospital was like, only that I knew how it felt, how much it hurt me, and how much I struggled to cope with it. Obviously I’m not saying my broken arm is anything comparable to assault or rape or trauma, but when you’re in a situation of extreme hurt, you don’t pay a lot of attention to the minute details, but you do remember vividly the images and feelings you experienced. And she did lay out details, and there’s no proof he isn’t guilty yet. There’s no proof he is either, but that’s because no one cared to be thorough with it, even with dozens of witnesses offering to testify and possibly corroborate. Nothing has been proven. But again, this all goes back to the point that Melania Trump is drastically oversimplifying the issue. It’s messier with more loopholes than that, something which she doesn’t fully understand or comprehend. Oh Lord, I'm in Babbet fest, this is in honour of the great late Stephane Audray. There is something called medical record, every single person has one. You cannot remember when you broke your arm, but your medical records clarifies that. Then the Democrats that vote 4 Bill Clinton in his seccond term are so hypocrital. at least nothing was prooven about Kavanaugh, and again, HE WAS MINOR AGE!!! But Clinton was not only major age but also the Gov. of Arkansas first (Paula Jones) and the President of United States (Lewinsky) then. And I support Clinton right to be elected and relected. But Hillary Clinton argue against a then possible Supreme Court Judge, 4 a sexual offense of a minor age guy, who had not license to drink alcohol. IT's too hard to take seriously. Finally I support all the brave women that made proof of Weinstein actions like Ashley Judd, Samantha Morton and specially Ambra Battilana Gutiérrez, she had all prooves, but none believed on her because her Berlusconi affair. On the other I have not respect at all 4 Meryl Streep, Oprah, Paltrow, Colin Firth, etc, etc, etc.- 90% of the mee too Celebrity Members that a couple of years ago celebrated Weinstein Bullies. And just wasn't only Celebrities, many on the IMDB supported as well. I was in fact in a minory, that argue that Weinstein bought all these oscars with a harsh lobby.-
|
|
|
Post by countjohn on Oct 14, 2018 4:03:55 GMT
Why do people hate her so much ? Serious question . Personally I'd say she's a civilian politically and people should just leave her out of that stuff. That's the way it is for First Ladies for the most part. Hillary Clinton was an exception since she was somewhat involved in shaping policy and spoke out on controversial issues.
|
|