|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Jul 5, 2018 21:14:06 GMT
Good riddance, the damage he did to the EPA will be felt for years to come. His replacement will no doubt be as bad though.
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jul 5, 2018 22:44:22 GMT
Good riddance, the damage he did to the EPA will be felt for years to come. His replacement will no doubt be as bad though.Bingo. Two steps forward, two steps back.
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Jul 5, 2018 22:51:27 GMT
Good riddance, the damage he did to the EPA will be felt for years to come. His replacement will no doubt be as bad though.Bingo. Two steps forward, two steps back. This is his replacement. Yep!
|
|
|
Post by IceTruckDexter on Jul 6, 2018 10:12:29 GMT
the damage he did to the EPA will be felt for years to come. Good that useless agency should be shut down.
|
|
dazed
Based
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 1,757
|
Post by dazed on Jul 6, 2018 16:15:15 GMT
His replacement isn’t any better.. wow.
Nothing better than taking advantage of the environment for some short term money gain! Woo!
|
|
dazed
Based
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 1,757
|
Post by dazed on Jul 6, 2018 16:25:19 GMT
the damage he did to the EPA will be felt for years to come. Good that useless agency should be shut down. You’re in favor for not having any regulations in regards to the environment?
|
|
|
Post by IceTruckDexter on Jul 6, 2018 20:17:36 GMT
Good that useless agency should be shut down. You’re in favor for not having any regulations in regards to the environment? This is one of the most frustrating things about lefties. You act like you know anything about environmental science and you dismiss anything that doesn't conform with the majority.
|
|
dazed
Based
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 1,757
|
Post by dazed on Jul 6, 2018 21:04:12 GMT
You’re in favor for not having any regulations in regards to the environment? This is one of the most frustrating things about lefties. You act like you know anything about environmental science and you dismiss anything that doesn't conform with the majority. What? All I asked was if you think there should be any environmental regulations. I didn’t dismiss anything that didn’t comform with the majority nor did I act like I know everything about environmental science with that question.
|
|
|
Post by IceTruckDexter on Jul 6, 2018 21:56:32 GMT
This is one of the most frustrating things about lefties. You act like you know anything about environmental science and you dismiss anything that doesn't conform with the majority. What? All I asked was if you think there should be any environmental regulations. I didn’t dismiss anything that didn’t comform with the majority nor did I act like I know everything about environmental science with that question. We've had this conversation before where I bring up a scientist with a different opinion an you say no that's not the consensus.
As for regulations, it depends what it is like any other.
|
|
dazed
Based
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 1,757
|
Post by dazed on Jul 6, 2018 22:43:28 GMT
What? All I asked was if you think there should be any environmental regulations. I didn’t dismiss anything that didn’t comform with the majority nor did I act like I know everything about environmental science with that question. We've had this conversation before where I bring up a scientist with a different opinion an you say no that's not the consensus.
As for regulations, it depends what it is like any other.
I don’t remember you bringing up any climate scientists with a different opinion, just a blog site that said something about there being no ice in a certain area around 100 years ago. I know that it’s hard to find any peer reviewed paper that goes against the consensus though, and the ones that have been written by climate scientists that wrote on things such as cloud covering and solar forcing being the primary driver behind climate change have since been debunked. I’m open to reading any of them if you have them though. I just think it’d be silly to put forward policies that go against environmental policies when the evidence greatly points towards us being the primary problem. Not really worth rolling the dice in my opinion. Okay, I was just wondering as I’ve never heard anyone say that they wanted to abolish the EPA. I think it’s important that corporations have guidelines such as to not dump waste in waterways like they did with the Cuyahoga River for an example.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Jul 7, 2018 0:17:33 GMT
We've had this conversation before where I bring up a scientist with a different opinion an you say no that's not the consensus.
As for regulations, it depends what it is like any other.
Not really worth rolling the dice in my opinion. Okay, I was just wondering as I’ve never heard anyone say that they wanted to abolish the EPA. I think it’s important that corporations have guidelines such as to not dump waste in waterways like they did with the Cuyahoga River for an example. This. I'm not some big environmentalist, but the hazard is too great to say "we're not going to anything about it." And yeah, we need regulation for pollution hazards at the very least. You can say that global warming doesn't exist, fine. But there's far more to the EPA than global warming fanatics.
|
|
|
Post by Ryan_MYeah on Jul 9, 2018 0:29:02 GMT
Good that useless agency should be shut down. You’re in favor for not having any regulations in regards to the environment? It is Dexter. More like anti-anything that keeps the world from tumbling into chaos.
|
|
CookiesNCream
Badass
So what else is new?
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 478
|
Post by CookiesNCream on Jul 13, 2018 1:59:30 GMT
No kidding.
|
|