|
Post by hugobolso on Jan 30, 2021 16:10:50 GMT
Any way Ir respect prochoice people, I don't agree that abortion is a women rights, and I don't respect the ones that said that is a human right (eliminating human by definitions can't never being a human right)
|
|
|
Post by Lord_Buscemi on Jan 31, 2021 16:12:27 GMT
Um, what happened to my comment above calling this idiot out for his vile bullshit?
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Jan 31, 2021 17:02:31 GMT
Um, what happened to my comment above calling this idiot out for his vile bullshit? Basically at this point I just save stuff somewhere else before I post so I can recopy it and clean it up if it gets deleted - make it less aggressive or whatever and re-post. I did this the other day - it was fine. That's really all you can do nowadays and going forward I guess, but if you believe in your post, stand by your post and repost it in a way that sustains your POV. I guess the mods are just discouraging conflict .......... You know, they aren't limiting your POV just trying to limit conflict, in the simplest way for them I guess.......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2021 2:36:02 GMT
I know I've mentioned my thoughts elsewhere on this forum, but I'll share them again here - I don't believe that women can be equal participants in society (socially, economically, etc.) if they don't have reproductive/sexual freedom.
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Feb 1, 2021 6:40:22 GMT
I know I've mentioned my thoughts elsewhere on this forum, but I'll share them again here - I don't believe that women can be equal participants in society (socially, economically, etc.) if they don't have reproductive/sexual freedom. How exactly a woman couldn't be equal participant in society, with or without abortion? I mean equality negative. Because a woman is more powerful because she could give birth, so the law protect women, and usually have more rights than men.(except on family name, that usually their children had usually the father last name), in several countries they retire first, usually they aren't forced to do military service ), the courtesy rules are in their favor. If they ask for maintenance, none complains (that not happened with men that they are consider like a kind of Gigolo).- I could understand that for raise children and for pregancy economincally, they could stop working for a while, but women usually lives more years than men, and life today is long enough to recover the lost years.- Maybe you r confusing equality with equity, because it's not the same have rights than excericed them.- Every american has the right to be choosen as the president of the United States, but Malia Obama, Chelsea Clinton and Ivanka Trump are closer to be choosen, than most of the mortals.-
|
|
|
Post by mhynson27 on Feb 1, 2021 8:49:35 GMT
Welp. I sense some more deleted posts in the near future.
|
|
|
Post by mhynson27 on Feb 1, 2021 8:51:50 GMT
I know I've mentioned my thoughts elsewhere on this forum, but I'll share them again here - I don't believe that women can be equal participants in society (socially, economically, etc.) if they don't have reproductive/sexual freedom. How exactly a woman couldn't be equal participant in society, with or without abortion? I mean equality negative. Because a woman is more powerful because she could give birth, so the law protect women, and usually have more rights than men.(except on family name, that usually their children had usually the father last name), in several countries they retire first, usually they aren't forced to do military service ), the courtesy rules are in their favor. If they ask for maintenance, none complains (that not happened with men that they are consider like a kind of Gigolo).- I could understand that for raise children and for pregancy economincally, they could stop working for a while, but women usually lives more years than men, and life today is long enough to recover the lost years.-Maybe you r confusing equality with equity, because it's not the same have rights than excericed them.- Every american has the right to be choosen as the president of the United States, but Malia Obama, Chelsea Clinton and Ivanka Trump are closer to be choosen, than most of the mortals.- If I'm understanding this correctly, this is one of the most fucked things anyone has ever said on here. I mean your whole post once again, is fucked, but that part really stood out.
|
|
|
Post by wilcinema on Feb 1, 2021 11:27:06 GMT
I know I've mentioned my thoughts elsewhere on this forum, but I'll share them again here - I don't believe that women can be equal participants in society (socially, economically, etc.) if they don't have reproductive/sexual freedom. How exactly a woman couldn't be equal participant in society, with or without abortion? I mean equality negative. Because a woman is more powerful because she could give birth, so the law protect women, and usually have more rights than men.(except on family name, that usually their children had usually the father last name), in several countries they retire first, usually they aren't forced to do military service ), the courtesy rules are in their favor. If they ask for maintenance, none complains (that not happened with men that they are consider like a kind of Gigolo).- I could understand that for raise children and for pregancy economincally, they could stop working for a while, but women usually lives more years than men, and life today is long enough to recover the lost years.- Maybe you r confusing equality with equity, because it's not the same have rights than excericed them.- Every american has the right to be choosen as the president of the United States, but Malia Obama, Chelsea Clinton and Ivanka Trump are closer to be choosen, than most of the mortals.- how much of a sociopath does one have to be to write this and think this is a legitimate take
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Feb 1, 2021 21:56:52 GMT
I'm sure I'd be offended by that hugobolso post if I had a damn clue what any of it meant
|
|
|
Post by Lord_Buscemi on Feb 2, 2021 0:51:41 GMT
I'm sure I'd be offended by that hugobolso post if I had a damn clue what any of it meant You missed his other deleted post, in which he equated a pro-choice society with "degenerate women" (sexually promiscuity "whores", "dirty" feminists, trans people).
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Feb 2, 2021 3:31:45 GMT
I'm sure I'd be offended by that hugobolso post if I had a damn clue what any of it meant You missed his other deleted post, in which he equated a pro-choice society with "degenerate women" (sexually promiscuity "whores", "dirty" feminists, trans people). I never post that.- Trully they don't undertand a joke, after the new stupid thing post by a SWJ. I post 3 photos, a scene of 365 (representing the polish woman), one of Lily Tomlin and one of Lady Gaga (representing the prochoice women).- - where was the sexually promiscuity? and the whore? and the trans people? What I try to post, is that prolife women could have the same or even more fun than the pro-choice ones.- You've seen both marches (no matter sex gender) where are usually the happy people, and where are the angry crowd?
|
|
|
Post by The_Cake_of_Roth on Feb 2, 2021 4:31:20 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2021 2:04:29 GMT
Paxton Smith is one of my new heroes.
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Jun 4, 2021 2:39:30 GMT
Paxton Smith is one of my new heroes. First Greta, now this one. Why the mainstraim globalist left uses underage girls as their new icons. Maybe because they haven't good arguments.- The whole things that poor Greta had asperger, and maybe this girl too.-
|
|
|
Post by Joaquim on Jun 4, 2021 2:40:51 GMT
Paxton Smith is one of my new heroes. First Greta, now this one. Why the mainstraim globalist left uses underage girls as their new icons. Maybe because they haven't good arguments.- The whole things that poor Greta had asperger, and maybe this girl too.- >high school valedictorian bro she’s probably not underage
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Jun 4, 2021 2:41:35 GMT
First Greta, now this one. Why the mainstraim globalist left uses underage girls as their new icons. Maybe because they haven't good arguments.- The whole things that poor Greta had asperger, and maybe this girl too.- >high school valedictorian bro she’s probably not underage Isn't 21 in US? I was over 30 in US and they asked my ID in the Casino and every time I bought a wine bottle.-
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Jun 4, 2021 3:45:01 GMT
>high school valedictorian bro she’s probably not underage Isn't 21 in US? I was over 30 in US and they asked my ID in the Casino and every time I bought a wine bottle.- So the U.S. has weird rules about drinking. You have to be 21 to drink, but at 18 you are officially a full adult... except that you can't drink. Because our government is stupid.
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Jun 4, 2021 3:56:47 GMT
Isn't 21 in US? I was over 30 in US and they asked my ID in the Casino and every time I bought a wine bottle.- So the U.S. has weird rules about drinking. You have to be 21 to drink, but at 18 you are officially a full adult... except that you can't drink. Because our government is stupid. I think 21 years is a weird rule about drinking, however, I remember when I was a kid, until I was around 12. That people could vote, drive and drink at 18, but they were minor age until 21, they couldn't sell or by a house or get married without consent of the parent or tutor.- You was absolute unable until 12 years (girl) 14 (boys), relative unable from that age until 18, relative able from that to 21, and absolute able from 21. So the minor age was 21. That were old laws based on Roman and Cannon Law.- Maybe some of this still survive in US
|
|
|
Post by Joaquim on Jun 4, 2021 4:29:49 GMT
>high school valedictorian bro she’s probably not underage Isn't 21 in US? I was over 30 in US and they asked my ID in the Casino and every time I bought a wine bottle.- 18 and they are obligated to ask for ID if you're buying alcohol and look younger than like 35 or something in some places
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2021 16:01:16 GMT
I'd like to emphasize the fact that at 6 weeks, most women wouldn't even know they were pregnant. An abortion ban after six weeks is in effect a total ban on abortion. Partricularly in Texas, where the new law makes no exceptions for rape or incest.
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jun 4, 2021 16:55:09 GMT
I'd like to emphasize the fact that at 6 weeks, most women wouldn't even know they were pregnant. An abortion ban after six weeks is in effect a total ban on abortion. Partricularly in Texas, where the new law makes no exceptions for rape or incest. For a lot of women there are literally no symptoms/signs of pregnancy at all at 6 weeks and nearly half of pregnancies are unplanned so a lot women (and this goes double for lower income and/or less educated women) won't necessarily be actively monitoring their bodies/cycles. The fact that some women have irregular or unpredictable periods compounds the problem. This would amount to a near-universal statewide ban on abortion. It's truly insane and barbaric.
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Jun 4, 2021 18:36:37 GMT
I'd like to emphasize the fact that at 6 weeks, most women wouldn't even know they were pregnant. An abortion ban after six weeks is in effect a total ban on abortion. Partricularly in Texas, where the new law makes no exceptions for rape or incest. If you have sex with a stranger, you use condoms. That's not matter if she say she is taking pill, and probably you will ejeculate outside, not inside.- Well I guess women that had sex, no matter the anticonceptive they taken, they will buy pregnancy test.- In most of coutries, the time is between 10 to 14 weeks, and in several countries is forbiden and isn't a big deal.-
I guess this is more a phillosophical, mental or whatever problem, than a real one.-
Six weeks itsn't a real problem. Other issue, is that there isn't an extra time or exceptions in special cases of rape, incest, minor age, incampacity or whatever.-
The whole thing that rape in 2021 is very easy to proove, so a declaration isn't good enough as a proof.- There are toxic examinations, there are lessions, thereshe was a minor or incapble,that the girl was in coma, in prison or whatever.- I remember a Jodie Foster Oscar winning film, in 1988,in which she taken a day after pill for prevent pregnacy after a rape. 1988!!!
Medicine advanced in 33 years.- Unfortunately pro choice people are still telling arguments of the 1960s, medicince change fortunately a lot in the last 60 years.-
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Jul 23, 2021 19:55:52 GMT
A big step today - not that abortion will be overturned - but you'll get some insight into the courts mindframe - which is the intent of this obviously: Mississippi urges US supreme court to overturn Roe v Wade in abortion case State argues that constitution does not support right to abortion
Court likely to hear the case this fall and rule in springwww.theguardian.com/law/2021/jul/23/abortion-us-supreme-court-mississippi-roe-v-wade
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2021 1:01:06 GMT
A big step today - not that abortion will be overturned - but you'll get some insight into the courts mindframe - which is the intent of this obviously: Mississippi urges US supreme court to overturn Roe v Wade in abortion case State argues that constitution does not support right to abortion
Court likely to hear the case this fall and rule in springwww.theguardian.com/law/2021/jul/23/abortion-us-supreme-court-mississippi-roe-v-wadeThis is insanity. I can't believe Roberts is even allowing this to go forward.
|
|
clunkybob2
Junior Member
clunky's posts should be locked in a cell
Posts: 262
Likes: 94
|
Post by clunkybob2 on Jul 24, 2021 12:51:13 GMT
I'm against it. You wanna kill your baby? Fine. But at least have the common courtesy to birth it first.
|
|