|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Jan 23, 2018 15:13:50 GMT
You know the whole "gay love love story between older guy and a younger guy " , "has sex with a teenage boy" , ...
|
|
|
|
Post by mhynson27 on Jan 23, 2018 15:14:46 GMT
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by Viced on Jan 23, 2018 15:15:11 GMT
No.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2018 15:15:53 GMT
No.
|
|
Savager
Junior Member
Posts: 430 
Likes: 508
|
Post by Savager on Jan 23, 2018 15:16:04 GMT
No.
|
|
doodle
New Member
Posts: 221
Likes: 29
|
Post by doodle on Jan 23, 2018 15:16:10 GMT
No. The votes were split between him and Stuhlbarg. Plus, Christopher Plummer's late surge made an impact.
|
|
|
|
Post by FrancescoAbides on Jan 23, 2018 15:17:50 GMT
I guess he was just not good enough
|
|
|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Jan 23, 2018 15:28:44 GMT
Doubt it.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Jan 23, 2018 15:31:09 GMT
No.
And there was no "vote split." Hammer always had the edge over Stuhlbarg due to screentime and the Globe nod. They just didn't like him as much as other films/performances.
|
|
|
|
Post by marvelass on Jan 23, 2018 15:41:37 GMT
Yes. Hammer could've easily ridden Chalamet's and the film's coattails to a nomination, like so any other 'lesser' performances have.
|
|
doodle
New Member
Posts: 221
Likes: 29
|
Post by doodle on Jan 23, 2018 15:46:08 GMT
No. And there was no "vote split." Hammer always had the edge over Stuhlbarg due to screentime and the Globe nod. They just didn't like him as much as other films/performances. You know you can just directly reply to me instead |
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Jan 23, 2018 15:47:41 GMT
No. And there was no "vote split." Hammer always had the edge over Stuhlbarg due to screentime and the Globe nod. They just didn't like him as much as other films/performances. You know you can just directly reply to me instead You were going to see it anyway. |
|
doodle
New Member
Posts: 221
Likes: 29
|
Post by doodle on Jan 23, 2018 15:53:04 GMT
You know you can just directly reply to me instead You were going to see it anyway. What's with this "sub posting" on here? Lol do people not know how to reply anymore? indirectly referring to someone when it's obvious who you're talking about is so juvenile |
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso1 on Jan 23, 2018 15:53:47 GMT
I haven't seen the movie, but I guess that the Academy loves little girls but hate young boys.
At 31 Hammer still consider too young 4 a nomination. He is a rich heir and a trully maverick, who shares his point of view, and is a trully pyromaniac.
Ok 2 young actors at leading. That's a progress, but I think there was an intern. One was black and the other donated his salary.-
|
|
|
|
Post by FrancescoAbides on Jan 23, 2018 15:54:01 GMT
You were going to see it anyway. What's with this "sub posting" on here? Lol do people not know how to reply anymore? indirectly referring to someone when it's obvious who you're talking about is so juvenile You are not the first and only dude to mention the "vote split" situation though |
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Jan 23, 2018 15:56:02 GMT
I guess he was just not good enoughWhat ?!? If Rachel McAdams + Jacki Weaver (SLP) managed to receive a nod for their "wallflower" performances then so should have Armie ! |
|
doodle
New Member
Posts: 221
Likes: 29
|
Post by doodle on Jan 23, 2018 15:56:50 GMT
What's with this "sub posting" on here? Lol do people not know how to reply anymore? indirectly referring to someone when it's obvious who you're talking about is so juvenile You are not the first and only dude to mention the "vote split" situation though never said i was |
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Jan 23, 2018 15:57:10 GMT
What's with this "sub posting" on here? Lol do people not know how to reply anymore? indirectly referring to someone when it's obvious who you're talking about is so juvenile You are not the first and only dude to mention the "vote split" situation though Not to mention I was responding to the OP's question originally. I just decided to piggyback the vote split nonsense in general to my post. |
|
doodle
New Member
Posts: 221
Likes: 29
|
Post by doodle on Jan 23, 2018 15:59:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by FrancescoAbides on Jan 23, 2018 16:01:10 GMT
I guess he was just not good enoughWhat ?!? If Rachel McAdams + Jacki Weaver (SLP) managed to receive a nod for their "wallflower" performances then so should have Armie ! Armie had a stronger competition, way stronger. Rachel McAdams deserved her nod though, she is great  |
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Jan 23, 2018 16:03:34 GMT
What ?!? If Rachel McAdams + Jacki Weaver (SLP) managed to receive a nod for their "wallflower" performances then so should have Armie ! Armie had a stronger competition, way stronger. Rachel McAdams deserved her nod though, she is great  To each his own I guess ps : 2012 supp actress category was no slouch either |
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso1 on Jan 23, 2018 16:08:14 GMT
I guess he was just not good enoughWhat ?!? If Rachel McAdams + Jacki Weaver (SLP) managed to receive a nod for their "wallflower" performances then so should have Armie ! But there are women. Hollywood is a Patriarchy. And Hammer made angre many popes. He is the masculin version of Susan Sarandon or Vanessa Redgrave or even Brigitte Bardot |
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Jan 23, 2018 16:09:44 GMT
And Hammer made angre many popes. Post quote of the year, and it ain't even February yet. |
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso1 on Jan 23, 2018 16:16:24 GMT
And Hammer made angre many popes. Post quote of the year, and it ain't even February yet. Thanks. i think you miss my quotes Hammer Made anger from the Affleck to James Wood. From left to right. And I love it. But 4 being nominated and won an Oscar, you should be a little lamb.- |
|
|
|
Post by bob-coppola on Jan 23, 2018 16:25:22 GMT
He should've got over Jenkins or Harrelson.
|
|
To each his own I guess
