|
Post by hugobolso on Jan 14, 2023 14:25:34 GMT
Maybe I get guuys lost in translation. This isnt about movies. This is about Academy Awards and their satélites Awards. Only 5 people will be nominated as best director. So if he isnt your personal top 5 (of the directions that had at least a slim Oscar Chances), he is taking somebody place. In films is exactly the same between 7 and 10 movies will be nominated. So if the Fabelmans isnt your personal on your top 10 is taking another movie place. Is the Director Guild Awards indulgent with Spielberg this year?, and last year? I am sorry, but I still don't understand your point. Are you saying The Fabelmans shouldn't be in the Picture - Director - Original Screenplay discussions because there are better films out there? You have admitted, you haven't seen The Fabelmans though. This is Academy Awards, I have a Child, In from Uruguay. I cannot seen every day a different movie legally. However after I read the plot Im not interested in seing the same unoriginal autoindulgent from a directors childhood. That was the main subject of hundred of movies in the last 100 years. And the trailer and box office dont help. Its Academy Awards, you can analize the race without seing a single movie. However despite I usually get right when finally Ive seen the movies. Some time like for example Precious Im wrong. And I have no trouble at all in recognized that.
|
|
|
Post by Brother Fease on Jan 14, 2023 16:08:12 GMT
I am sorry, but I still don't understand your point. Are you saying The Fabelmans shouldn't be in the Picture - Director - Original Screenplay discussions because there are better films out there? You have admitted, you haven't seen The Fabelmans though. This is Academy Awards, I have a Child, In from Uruguay. I cannot seen every day a different movie legally. However after I read the plot Im not interested in seing the same unoriginal autoindulgent from a directors childhood. That was the main subject of hundred of movies in the last 100 years. And the trailer and box office dont help. Its Academy Awards, you can analize the race without seing a single movie. However despite I usually get right when finally Ive seen the movies. Some time like for example Precious Im wrong. And I have no trouble at all in recognized that. Here's a novel idea: Why don't you watch the movie BEFORE calling it "overpraised"?
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Jan 14, 2023 16:52:10 GMT
No body ever takes anyone else's place. Most of his films would not have been made without him. Spielberg has only won Oscar Director twice and Picture once. And if it was up to audiences, the Marvel universe would have lots of Oscar wins.
Maybe I get guuys lost in translation. This isnt about movies. This is about Academy Awards and their satélites Awards. Only 5 people will be nominated as best director. So if he isnt your personal top 5 (of the directions that had at least a slim Oscar Chances), he is taking somebody place. In films is exactly the same between 7 and 10 movies will be nominated. So if the Fabelmans isnt your personal on your top 10 is taking another movie place. Is the Director Guild Awards indulgent with Spielberg this year?, and last year? No
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Jan 24, 2023 16:09:58 GMT
And The fableman or whatever Spielberg film is, got nominated best film, director, actress and screen play.-
I don't think for movies (because common there were ten). But I guess his has more Oscar Nominations as Best Directors, that all the women nominated as best director together!!!
|
|
|
Post by JangoB on Jan 24, 2023 16:10:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Jan 24, 2023 16:15:17 GMT
Poor Sarah Polley, Poor Gina Prince-Bythewood, Poor Charlotte Wells, Poor Chinonye Chukwu.
HeteroPatriarcally wins again.-
|
|
|
Post by Billy_Costigan on Jan 24, 2023 16:23:08 GMT
Yes, I haven't been a fan of Spielberg's last few efforts. However, I think The Fabelmans is his best in 10 years. You could make a case that his best since Munich.
|
|