|
Post by Martin Stett on Apr 16, 2022 12:02:29 GMT
I got to thinking about Christopher Nolan today. I used to be a fan of his. I really liked Memento, Insomnia, Following, TDK trilogy, and Inception when I first saw them. They were loads of fun to try wrapping my head around. I felt that Interstellar was a mess, but a sweet and heartfelt one. (I never liked The Prestige, but everybody is bound to have one movie I dislike.) But in the last few years, I've turned from a positive view of Nolan to a negative one. I didn't like Dunkirk, I LOATHED Tenet, and my rewatches of TDK trilogy, Memento and Inception have all negatively affected the way I think of his output. I see him as a shallow trickster that relies on sleight of hand for payoffs instead of any sort of consistent character writing. He mostly doesn't have characters at all (TDKR and Interstellar attempted to amend this, before he doubled down on not caring about people with Dunkirk).
Looking back on his whole output, I realize that they all use narrative trickery to hide how cynical and emotionless they are. Memento no longer has anything resembling an emotional throughline with the protagonist's wife, because she is simply an object that propels the story forward (which I suppose is the whole point, as the protagonist is just a puppet to everyone around him). Inception uses a blatantly *emotional* character in Mal to symbolize all of Cobb's demons, but has him openly explain all of his issues to Ariadne and divorcing the "drama" from the "action" instead of showing any sort of inner struggle that changes how he personally relates to people throughout the story. The Dark Knight never makes any sense out of how the Joker runs his agents, and just uses spectacle to hide this.
The point is that I can no longer enjoy Nolan the way I used to. Dunkirk and Tenet destroyed the last illusions I had about him, as they ignore character entirely, turning everyone into marionettes for a narrative to happen at. When I compare movies to Nolan, I now view it as a curse: The Father is a "pseudo-Nolan movie" that hides its lack of character content behind disorienting scene changes and "putting the audience in the experience" instead of crafting a human being and allowing us to empathize with how he loses track of reality. I can't find anything but disdain for this kind of writing anymore, and it is Nolan that really made me realize how much I loath it.
Are there any directors (or writers) that have done this to you? What made you realize that you had a problem with them, and did it change how you see their works prior to your realization?
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Apr 16, 2022 13:07:35 GMT
Well, I think Christopher Nolan has outgrown me tbh in a way ........I mean his first 3 are his best 3 (love them) because they were rooted in the real world and he's increasingly become a fantasist..... Now, that's my bias against the types of films he mostly makes now - comic books, sci-fi, explosion-fests .......many would argue that all genres of Art can be equally great - which is true, for Tarkovsky but not when he does it .........I liked every movie he's ever made but Tenet I watched in a way where it was merely inflicted upon me. The same way I could go see a band and appreciate the light show.......I wasn't involved in it, at all.......like I said though, it's probably my problem not his so much. Quentin Tarantino is the obvious answer here for me. Starting with Jackie Brown to me - he lost the plot but after it, he really lost it - him stretching in ways that only worked in "let him off the hook" theory......and after that .....um, his Hollywood revision films reveal his limitations - Inglorious Basterds, Django, OUATIH are what I would call a symptomatic of an increasing "lying to yourself" childishness in America culture - politically, historically, culturally. Rewriting history to make it more palatable to our cinematic wishes - the same way we do in US politics / culture but with our broader, delusional wishes - we "pretend" that Thomas Jefferson wasn't a great man because he owned slaves (he still was, Brad Pitt's great speech notwithstanding) so we tear down a statue to make it "fit the way we "feel" now" or the way the Republican Party can still "pretend" they didn't lose an election...... In a way he creates a kind of clothed pornography - the most boring kind tbh - where you don't watch porn and think "what was the actresses motivation for this scene" or "what is the subtext to this scene?" because it exists outside of anything you can picture relating to "actual" existence, so it is with QT in how his films resolve themselves .....very few of his bullets matter in anything he's done post-PF and they used to matter a whole lot.....it's infantilism, mostly BS......
|
|
|
Post by ibbi on Apr 16, 2022 13:37:49 GMT
I loved 60s Godard so much when I was a film student, but watching most of that stuff back in the past decade I find all but maybe a couple of those movies to be unwatchably juvenile.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2022 13:55:40 GMT
I loved 60s Godard so much when I was a film student, but watching most of that stuff back in the past decade I find all but maybe a couple of those movies to be unwatchably juvenile. Do you like Éric Rohmer?
|
|
Nikan
Based
Posts: 3,117
Likes: 1,533
|
Post by Nikan on Apr 16, 2022 14:13:10 GMT
I remember you beating Tenet to death in a series of posts and finishing with "the worst action movie I've ever seen" and thinking to myself "this guy sure hasn't seen a lot then". Then again I don't think you've left a work of anime or videogame untouched so maybe you are up to something with that deceleration ...I thought it was "passable" (and I do fall in the camp that somehow can find amusement in Nolan indirectly announcing he doesn't care for writing good characters here w. naming his lead "the protagonist" and such...which is still awkward). I thought it fell right in the middle of his filmography ranking-wise, and there are far worse action flicks out there which don't stand out because they lack Nolan's name on them personality.
|
|
|
Post by ibbi on Apr 16, 2022 14:26:26 GMT
I loved 60s Godard so much when I was a film student, but watching most of that stuff back in the past decade I find all but maybe a couple of those movies to be unwatchably juvenile. Do you like Éric Rohmer? Not always, but a lot of the time, yes! People just wandering around talking is kind of a pet peeve of mine but sometimes he put it to incredible ends (Pauline at the Beach, A Good Marriage, Reinette and Mirabelle, etc.)
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Apr 16, 2022 15:05:26 GMT
I remember you beating Tenet to death in a series of posts and finishing with "the worst action movie I've ever seen" and thinking to myself "this guy sure hasn't seen a lot then". Then again I don't think you've left a work of anime or videogame untouched so maybe you are up to something with that deceleration. Is that meant to be "declaration?" I haven't seen many bargain bin action films, to be clear. I tend to stick with the bigger stuff, as the genre rarely appeals to me. I ask a few things out of an action film: 1. First off, write your character beats into the action. Pausing to catch your breath is great and all action movies need to do this, but actions should matter. A tiny thing like Fury Road's Angharad not knowing how to reload a gun, having said gun yanked out of her hands by a disdainful Toast, tells me more about those two characters than whole scenes of characters talking out their feelings. 2. Write characters who behave professionally. Banter is fine, but you cannot break the immersion of "would this character do this thing in this situation without immediately being called out/killed?" Kylo Ren being a whiny baby is a dealbreaker, as is Poe mocking Hux's mother and not getting shot out of the sky. Especially in military or paramilitary characters, this is *crucial.* I just finished a part of Final Fantasy XIV an hour ago that I LOVED: It was twenty minutes of characters discussing how to go about a large scale military operation, and then commencing the operation in a logical, professional manner. There is A LOT of banter and comedy in the fight, but it arises from characters respecting each other and poking fun at each other (Y'shtola questioning whether Estinien misunderstood the order to "subdue the enemy" as "enthusiastically murder them" made me laugh, as did Magnai saving Sadu's ass only for everyone to praise Sadu for saving the day as Magnai looks disheartened in the background). The comedy works because I trust these characters to be adults aware of their responsibilities, and that gives their actions weight. 3. If at all possible, write your themes into the action. If you have any "message," organically fit it in. Fury Road works the idea of "we are not things" through the way Joe treats all of his subordinates as cattle, while Furiosa's crew is less obviously efficient but each member has very specific skills that are useful, from Nux's black thumb to Cheedo's uselessness and cowardice becoming a plot point at the end, showing her overcoming her flaws to become a hero. 4. Create some semblance of tension to the action. Make it clear that the characters can be hurt, or that they can screw up. I didn't like The Raid because it was nonstop punching and fighting that was obviously just a dance, and I don't recall seeing any solitary moment in which anybody important proved fallible. Do the first three things, and I guarantee that I will like your action movie. Tenet doesn't attempt points 1 or 3, and it cheats around point 2 because there are no characters to speak of. As for the fourth point (which is a bonus if you succeed at the others), Tenet screws that up with its time travel gimmick. There is no suspense whatsoever to anything, because it has all already happened. We saw it happen. Or we're seeing the future happen, so we know everything is fine in the present. Nothing matters, because predetermination. I'm gonna stick by my call of "worst action movie I've seen." It is too much of a machine, not even caring to write the most basic of characters when it can just cynically plug in an avatar and ignore character beats altogether. Regardless of how technically impressive the film is, I could feel nothing but complete boredom because I could get the same experience from watching a cat bat at a screensaver. It's just sound and fury, signifying nothing.
|
|
Nikan
Based
Posts: 3,117
Likes: 1,533
|
Post by Nikan on Apr 16, 2022 15:25:33 GMT
I remember you beating Tenet to death in a series of posts and finishing with "the worst action movie I've ever seen" and thinking to myself "this guy sure hasn't seen a lot then". Then again I don't think you've left a work of anime or videogame untouched so maybe you are up to something with that deceleration. Is that meant to be "declaration?" I haven't seen many bargain bin action films, to be clear. I tend to stick with the bigger stuff, as the genre rarely appeals to me. I ask a few things out of an action film: 1. First off, write your character beats into the action. Pausing to catch your breath is great and all action movies need to do this, but actions should matter. A tiny thing like Fury Road's Angharad not knowing how to reload a gun, having said gun yanked out of her hands by a disdainful Toast, tells me more about those two characters than whole scenes of characters talking out their feelings. 2. Write characters who behave professionally. Banter is fine, but you cannot break the immersion of "would this character do this thing in this situation without immediately being called out/killed?" Kylo Ren being a whiny baby is a dealbreaker, as is Poe mocking Hux's mother and not getting shot out of the sky. Especially in military or paramilitary characters, this is *crucial.* I just finished a part of Final Fantasy XIV an hour ago that I LOVED: It was twenty minutes of characters discussing how to go about a large scale military operation, and then commencing the operation in a logical, professional manner. There is A LOT of banter and comedy in the fight, but it arises from characters respecting each other and poking fun at each other (Y'shtola questioning whether Estinien misunderstood the order to "subdue the enemy" as "enthusiastically murder them" made me laugh, as did Magnai saving Sadu's ass only for everyone to praise Sadu for saving the day as Magnai looks disheartened in the background). The comedy works because I trust these characters to be adults aware of their responsibilities, and that gives their actions weight. 3. If at all possible, write your themes into the action. If you have any "message," organically fit it in. Fury Road works the idea of "we are not things" through the way Joe treats all of his subordinates as cattle, while Furiosa's crew is less obviously efficient but each member has very specific skills that are useful, from Nux's black thumb to Cheedo's uselessness and cowardice becoming a plot point at the end, showing her overcoming her flaws to become a hero. 4. Create some semblance of tension to the action. Make it clear that the characters can be hurt, or that they can screw up. I didn't like The Raid because it was nonstop punching and fighting that was obviously just a dance, and I don't recall seeing any solitary moment in which anybody important proved fallible. Do the first three things, and I guarantee that I will like your action movie. You're gonna love the original The Taking of Pelham One Two Three then.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Apr 16, 2022 16:11:46 GMT
You're gonna love the original The Taking of Pelham One Two Three then. Is that sarcastic or genuine? I've been interested in the movie for awhile, but I've never caught up with it.
|
|
Nikan
Based
Posts: 3,117
Likes: 1,533
|
Post by Nikan on Apr 16, 2022 17:08:58 GMT
You're gonna love the original The Taking of Pelham One Two Three then. Is that sarcastic or genuine? I've been interested in the movie for awhile, but I've never caught up with it. Oh I'm being genuine. I saw pretty much everything you wrote in it; minus "the action" in the way that you probably have in mind - it's from the 70s after all... but it's a blast when it comes to "character-moments". Among the top 10-20 movies I saw last year, regardless of genre.
|
|
|
Post by themoviesinner on Apr 16, 2022 17:42:58 GMT
I don't know. Paul Thomas Anderson probably. I was a big fan of his up to The Master (his best film for me), but Inherent Vice and Phantom Thread just left me cold and indifferent. I wasn't a fan of either at all. I also had rewatched Boogie Nights and Magnolia in the meantime and, while I still like them quite a bit, I definitely don't hold them in such a high esteem as I once did. I liked his latest, Licorice Pizza, a lot, though, so, maybe, I'll be warming up to him again in the future.
Also there are directors like Sharunas Bartas and Philippe Grandrieux. I absolutely loved the first film I watched from each (Few Of Us and A New Life respectively, both near masterpieces), but everything else I've watched from them, I wasn't a fan of at all, even though it was stylistically and thematically very similar to those aforementioned films.
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Apr 16, 2022 19:23:43 GMT
I've been thinking a lot about this too. There are so many layers to it but I think it boils down to you just being most excited about what feels new to you. Nolan's brand of epic serious blockbuster felt new to me in the late 2000s and doesn't anymore. Even if I still admire aspects of his craft (there's something to appreciate in every single one of his films), it doesn't have that freshness anymore. It feels familiar. Godard's 60s stuff was fresh, exciting and transgressive to me in the early 2010s when I discovered the Criterion Collection but now I sort of dread revisiting any of it. A lot of those 90s classics like Pulp Fiction, Fargo, Fight Club, Seven, Reservoir Dogs I'm also nervous about revisiting (some I already have). Those films ushered me into cinephilia. They were the first ones I consumed when I was just baby movie buff but I've changed SO MUCH since watching them. As I've come into more awareness of myself and interests, my tastes have evolved substantially. I think the more I've seen, the less broad my tastes have become. Paradoxically the more you see, the less you enjoy. Greenaway is someone who still feels fresh to me because of how genuinely irreverent he can be in how he integrates sex, violence and bodily function. He's a highly-intelligent pervert who's interested--often morseo--in artistic mediums other than film which gives his cinema a wholly distinct feel. His films are almost anti-films. But a lot of his stuff I've seen only once. If I watched it often enough I'd probably turn on it too... Another example: So right now I'm also really interested in horror, especially trashy VHS stuff from the 70s and 80s because that's new to me right now. I missed practically all of it growing up. Hell, until a few years ago I turned my nose up at these kinds of films but now am finding enjoyment in just throwing myself into them every October. Trash is fun! But will I still be interested in them 10 years from now? I don't know. @ Martin Stett you're not supposed to "understand" Tenet. You're supposed to feel it
|
|
Film Socialism
Based
99.9999% of rock is crap
Posts: 2,555
Likes: 1,388
|
Post by Film Socialism on Apr 17, 2022 2:45:13 GMT
ive come around on nolan, think he's fun
have soured on tarantino and bergman
|
|
Barbie
Full Member
Posts: 859
Likes: 535
|
Post by Barbie on Apr 17, 2022 23:37:48 GMT
My answer is Nolan as well, but it’s nowhere near as strong as your feelings towards him. I’m just bored by him
Imo, what you said about narrative trickery and sleight of hand definitely applies to his brother Jonathan Nolan who turned Westworld into a mess. I had to stop watching the show once season 2 ended because it so fucking terrible
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on Apr 17, 2022 23:50:04 GMT
I won't say I've outgrown him, but I've been very disappointed in Soderbergh's recent output.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Apr 20, 2022 18:44:53 GMT
You're gonna love the original The Taking of Pelham One Two Three then. Quite right. Very tight action movie. Walter Matthau is weirdly becoming one of my favorite action stars, between his turns in Charade, Pelham and Hopscotch. His air of weariness mixed with professionalism makes him a perfect fit for these roles.
|
|
|
Post by FallenWarrior on May 5, 2022 16:43:18 GMT
Let me just say, even as teenager, i thought Godard was meh. First time I watched Alphaville I could just tell he probably liked the smell of his own farts. With that being said his influence on cinema cannot be overstated.
Used to like Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs but these days I prefer everything he's done afterwards.
Nolan is alright but I find it hard to take The Dark Knight trilogy seriously sometimes. Dunkirk is great though.
I fucking love Soderberg these days, I think he's made some of the best American movies from the 2000s.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on May 5, 2022 17:23:28 GMT
Tarantino for sure. I still love Pulp Fiction/Jackie Brown/Inglourious Basterds and I think his directorial verve hasn't suffered too much over the years, but I think something broke in his head midway through writing Django, and everything he's made since that point has been regressive, masturbatory, and frankly boring. Once Upon A Time... in Hollywood especially outright bores me as a film because I can see the potential for a truly fascinating and bold film, and the craft behind it is certainly there, but he just fails to engage with it fully on a narrative level and it plays out in the tritest and frankly most juvenile way possible. The Hateful Eight had the same problem. I think Tarantino should return to the adaptation well and give a pre-existing property the Jackie Brown treatment; his original content is played out.
|
|
|
Post by Ryan_MYeah on May 5, 2022 17:41:24 GMT
If Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood wasn’t just a fluke, Tarantino will likely be it. Same goes for Wes after The French Dispatch. Tim Burton is also one I’ve LONG gotten tired of.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on May 5, 2022 17:56:48 GMT
Same goes for Wes after The French Dispatch.Ooooh, this is a good one. I was really off the Wes Anderson train when Darjeeling Limited came out (appropriately, given it takes place on a train) and didn't like his animated works too much, but I did quite enjoy Grand Budapest, but I really thought French Dispatch stunk.
|
|
|
Post by FallenWarrior on Jul 23, 2023 21:29:12 GMT
I've cooled out on Edgar Wright
|
|
speeders
Based
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 2,211
|
Post by speeders on Jul 24, 2023 15:27:15 GMT
Quentin Tarantino and especially Tim Burton.I would've said Nolan too but Oppenheimer redeemed him for me.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Jul 24, 2023 15:44:32 GMT
I've been thinking a lot about this too. There are so many layers to it but I think it boils down to you just being most excited about what feels new to you. Nolan's brand of epic serious blockbuster felt new to me in the late 2000s and doesn't anymore. Even if I still admire aspects of his craft (there's something to appreciate in every single one of his films), it doesn't have that freshness anymore. It feels familiar. Godard's 60s stuff was fresh, exciting and transgressive to me in the early 2010s when I discovered the Criterion Collection but now I sort of dread revisiting any of it. A lot of those 90s classics like Pulp Fiction, Fargo, Fight Club, Seven, Reservoir Dogs I'm also nervous about revisiting (some I already have). Those films ushered me into cinephilia. They were the first ones I consumed when I was just baby movie buff but I've changed SO MUCH since watching them. As I've come into more awareness of myself and interests, my tastes have evolved substantially. I think the more I've seen, the less broad my tastes have become. Paradoxically the more you see, the less you enjoy. I think you nailed it. The sense of something being fresh is what makes a movie great.
|
|
forksforest
Junior Member
Quit your shit-spitting
Posts: 491
Likes: 212
|
Post by forksforest on Jul 27, 2023 5:28:45 GMT
Wes Anderson. Other than Moonrise Kingdom and to a lesser extent, The Royal Tenenbaums, I think I’d find it torturous to sit through his movies when I once admired his uniqueness and the obvious quirk. It’s irksome to me and I think the French Dispatch may permanently by the last Anderson film I watch to save myself. It’s too bad Edward Norton has paired himself w Anderson for these non essential almost cameo roles.
I don’t think I’ve outgrown Nolan - his initial filmography is still incredible to me starting w Memento up until maybe Interstellar. I think Tenet just proved that Nolan has gotten a bit full of himself so it’s not so much outgrowing him as it is the quality of his films.
But tbh, I find a lot of once-great directors who have been around for a while have now been churning out mediocre output. Then again, most careers may have a string of misfires bc they find inspiration again
|
|