|
Post by JangoB on Oct 4, 2023 14:46:09 GMT
Let's complete the character video trifecta:
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Oct 5, 2023 16:05:09 GMT
Don't watch it if you wanna go in blind - rather good scene though - you know how this shit works ......
|
|
Archie
Based
Eraserhead son or Inland Empire daughter?
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 4,384
Member is Online
|
Post by Archie on Oct 5, 2023 22:08:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Joaquim on Oct 5, 2023 23:08:57 GMT
So tempted to make this my new avy
|
|
|
Post by The_Cake_of_Roth on Oct 6, 2023 6:51:53 GMT
|
|
Archie
Based
Eraserhead son or Inland Empire daughter?
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 4,384
Member is Online
|
Post by Archie on Oct 6, 2023 16:28:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Oct 6, 2023 16:58:18 GMT
Good.. Spike has spoken.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Oct 6, 2023 17:03:03 GMT
Like he did for Angela Bassett last year.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Oct 6, 2023 19:02:11 GMT
Whoa - Spike has seen Color Purple and Poor Things and likes Gladstone? Oh no, he hasn't ............ (I guess) so take anything Little Man says with a lot of salt - he talks a lot - all the time and he hits on something interesting at a lower rate than Paul Schrader does .......especially about Oscars .......speaking of which he sounds like he's going KotFM over Oppy..... this is the narrative for KotFM to win by the way even if I remain doubtful myself......especially with the KotFM ending (the very ending, spoiled in a lot of reviews): Later on in the interview, Lee also calls Nolan’s “Oppenheimer” a “great film,” but says he should have shown the resulted atrocities of the nuclear bomb in Japan:
“I would like to add some more minutes about what happened to the Japanese people. People got vaporized. Many years later, people are radioactive. It’s not like he didn’t have power. He tells studios what to do. I would have loved to have the end of the film maybe show what it did, dropping those two nuclear bombs on Japan. Understand, this is all love. And I bet he could tell me some things he would change about “Do the Right Thing” and “Malcolm X.”
|
|
|
Post by Brother Fease on Oct 7, 2023 9:03:14 GMT
I see that his daughter gave him the gen z quiz and he got most of it correct.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Oct 8, 2023 22:38:15 GMT
First Nadal says Djokovic is the GOAT, now Coppola says Scorsese is the World's Greatest Living Filmmaker (Werner Herzog diss!).....what's next - someone on MAR is gonna say pacinoyes is a fncking national treasure or some shit?
|
|
|
Post by JangoB on Oct 9, 2023 15:48:29 GMT
This is the type of campaign that can really bring Marty his second Oscar (in addition to the quality of his work, of course):
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Oct 10, 2023 20:14:41 GMT
So in order to see this in Dolby and not miss a bday party I have to take my kid to or my anniversary dinner, I’ll be seeing a 7:45 am show next Sat. So far I show one other psychopath that will be in attendance with me.
|
|
|
Post by Brother Fease on Oct 15, 2023 16:29:34 GMT
Just in case you missed. One of my favorite television news programs, CBS Sunday Morning, did an incredible look into the film:
|
|
|
Post by wallsofjericho on Oct 16, 2023 18:22:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by The_Cake_of_Roth on Oct 17, 2023 5:01:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by JangoB on Oct 17, 2023 13:13:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Oct 17, 2023 16:24:03 GMT
The worst part is when Scorsese says "I'd cast you if ya gained weight and had your nose busted - ya pretty boy"
Just kidding but he totally was thnking that .......
|
|
|
Post by wallsofjericho on Oct 17, 2023 16:53:01 GMT
Leo reminded me a lot of Jack Nicholson in that trailer.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Oct 18, 2023 0:30:20 GMT
This may be the first serious chink in this movie's armour as far as potential awards fallibility (obviously it'll get nominated for loads of stuff, but this may make wins tougher to come by). Some of the movie's Osage Indian consultants, including language consultant Christopher Cote aren't completely happy with elements of the film. Cote feel it's more from the perspective of DiCaprio's character, as opposed to Gladstone's, and he hates that they gave DiCaprio's character a conscience to make him seem sympathetic when he conspired to murder his Osage wife's entire family. He respects that Scorsese didn't make it for an Osage audience though, but feels it needed an Osage or Indian director to be truly authentic.
What's insane is that Cote said this on the red carpet of the film's premiere. Props to him for being true to his opinions on how the film represents his people's history and pain, but the PR people for the movie must have been tearing their hair out and regretting giving him an invite.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Oct 18, 2023 0:35:29 GMT
This may be the first serious chink in this movie's armour as far as potential awards fallibility (obviously it'll get nominated for loads of stuff, but this may make wins tougher to come by). Some of the movie's Osage Indian consultants, including language consultant Christopher Cote aren't completely happy with elements of the film. Cote feel it's more from the perspective of DiCaprio's character, as opposed to Gladstone's, and he hates that they gave DiCaprio's character a conscience to make him seem sympathetic when he conspired to murder his Osage wife's entire family. Respects that Scorsese didn't make it for an Osage audience though, but it's need an Osage or Indian director to be truly authentic. What's insane is that Cote said this on the red carpet of the film's premiere. Props to him for being true to his opinions on how the film represents his people's history and pain, but the PR people for the movie must have been tearing their hair out and regretting giving him an invite. This was something I had posted about earlier in this thread: the idea that Scorsese did not go far enough in exploring the perspective of the Osage.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Oct 18, 2023 0:38:59 GMT
This may be the first serious chink in this movie's armour as far as potential awards fallibility (obviously it'll get nominated for loads of stuff, but this may make wins tougher to come by). Some of the movie's Osage Indian consultants, including language consultant Christopher Cote aren't completely happy with elements of the film. Cote feel it's more from the perspective of DiCaprio's character, as opposed to Gladstone's, and he hates that they gave DiCaprio's character a conscience to make him seem sympathetic when he conspired to murder his Osage wife's entire family. Respects that Scorsese didn't make it for an Osage audience though, but it's need an Osage or Indian director to be truly authentic. What's insane is that Cote said this on the red carpet of the film's premiere. Props to him for being true to his opinions on how the film represents his people's history and pain, but the PR people for the movie must have been tearing their hair out and regretting giving him an invite. This was something I had posted about earlier in this thread: the idea that Scorsese did not go far enough in exploring the perspective of the Osage.Guess you called it correct. I do wonder if this discourse that DiCaprio's character of Burkhart is too romanticised/sympathetic might end up costing him what seemed like an inevitable nomination.
|
|
|
Post by wallsofjericho on Oct 18, 2023 1:26:25 GMT
It's strange because Scorsese has been on interviews saying it's from Molly's perspective in some instances. A lot of complaints from the few negative ones do allude to Ernest being featured too much.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Oct 18, 2023 1:32:41 GMT
Guess you called it correct. I do wonder if this discourse that DiCaprio's character of Burkhart is too romanticised/sympathetic might end up costing him what seemed like an inevitable nomination. I think the nomination is safe, especially as people are calling it the performance of his career. But I think there does have to be a discussion about how DiCaprio's vanity shaped this project, how he refused the traditional heroic role of Tom White and he and Scorsese made an active choice to reshape the story . . . only to make his conflicted enabler of violence and murder the focal character. Yes, it may have given the Osage more of a focus, but it does seem a bit disingenuous to also promote it as their story when we're still seeing it through the eyes of a white male protagonist. They tried to have their cake and eat it too, by the sounds of it.
|
|
|
Post by finniussnrub on Oct 18, 2023 1:45:55 GMT
Guess you called it correct. I do wonder if this discourse that DiCaprio's character of Burkhart is too romanticised/sympathetic might end up costing him what seemed like an inevitable nomination. Eh *Citation needed*. This outrage may get trade "think pieces" and twitter/X going but when has such outrage truly changed the Oscar race? Green Book still won. Affleck still won. Maybe you can argue that it cost La La Land the win, but you could as easily argue that it burned out early due to the Globes sweep leading to backlash.
|
|