|
|
Post by Joaquim on May 24, 2020 5:56:05 GMT
Jo Jorgensen has won the libertarian nomination and after doing a quick background check, she seems like the real deal.
So instead of picking between pussy grabber and pussy sniffer, vote for the woman.
#ImWithHer
|
|
urbanpatrician
Based
"I just wanna go back, back to 1999. back to hit me baby one more time" - Charli XCX
Posts: 4,825
Likes: 2,354
|
Post by urbanpatrician on May 24, 2020 6:24:34 GMT
Libertarian Party IS a Vermont culture. LOL GUFF LOL. Ok, I'm stereotyping Vermont girls. (went on date with one, she was pretty)
But I do think the party nominated the right person. Time to move on from Gary Johnson. Still, I was Trump 2016. I can't see myself being tempted to change that unless the Libertarian party nominates Clint Eastwood or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on May 24, 2020 20:17:36 GMT
Not kidding (really) - I read this at first and thought it said "won the librarian nomination" and I was like ok that sounds pretty fnckin' minor but it's just crazy enough to win!  Imagine the great political ads librarians could run......... "We will NOT be quiet ........anymore!" .........hmmmmmmmmm |
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on May 25, 2020 1:35:07 GMT
so she'll be on the ticket as the candidate people vote for when they don't really want to vote. Good for her.
|
|
Film Socialism
Based
99.9999% of rock is crap
Posts: 2,555 
Likes: 1,388
|
Post by Film Socialism on May 25, 2020 3:50:50 GMT
so she'll be on the ticket as the candidate people vote for when they don't really want to vote. Good for her. wouldn't it more be the candidate people vote for when they DO really want to vote? voting for someone who won't win the nom seems more indicative of voting bc you want to |
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on May 25, 2020 6:30:42 GMT
so she'll be on the ticket as the candidate people vote for when they don't really want to vote. Good for her. wouldn't it more be the candidate people vote for when they DO really want to vote? voting for someone who won't win the nom seems more indicative of voting bc you want to that's one way to look at it, but in a two-party system throwing away your vote on third party is just upholding the status quo and not participating. |
|
Film Socialism
Based
99.9999% of rock is crap
Posts: 2,555
Likes: 1,388
|
Post by Film Socialism on May 25, 2020 7:41:14 GMT
wouldn't it more be the candidate people vote for when they DO really want to vote? voting for someone who won't win the nom seems more indicative of voting bc you want to that's one way to look at it, but in a two-party system throwing away your vote on third party is just upholding the status quo and not participating. galaxy brain shit my friend |
|
|
|
Post by MsMovieStar on May 25, 2020 11:40:40 GMT
Oh honeys, I've thought about running many a time... as I really like some of the stuff Melania's been wearing. She never looks frumpy.
I am just worried that I may be mistaken for AOC... I suppose we could team up as a sister act, but I don't know if she can dance. She could be vice... or maybe I'd be more suitable for vice...
|
|
|
|
Post by mrimpossible on May 25, 2020 23:13:46 GMT
She's 63 and still a libertarian? Nope.
|
|
Film Socialism
Based
99.9999% of rock is crap
Posts: 2,555
Likes: 1,388
|
Post by Film Socialism on May 27, 2020 23:20:19 GMT
She's 63 and still a libertarian? Nope. what if the septagenarian consents tho |
|
