|
Post by pacinoyes on Jan 24, 2020 20:44:08 GMT
A lot of people will hate this and yet........I kind of thought it rocked........it's ridiculously convoluted and unbelievable but there is something to be said for all these men acting so manly and so un-PC, it's as close as you can get to The Dirty Dozen nowadays - if you break this down on a scene by scene level, every scene works even if it doesn't quite make sense. Even if it doesn't work you will watch to see how it plays out anyway.........like a greatest hits movie.
All the acting is fine or better, but Hugh Grant steals the show in a part made for Gary Oldman if he was doing a stab at a Michael Caine attempt at the same role in 1972.
Also: The best opening sequence in sometime (pre-credit/credit), great use of music including the best Roxy Music song ever used quite well (In Every Dream Home A Heartache) and a pacinoyes all time favorite to end the film.
~7...........you have to go along with it if not, this isn't you're kind of thing........I can see this getting a lot of one star reviews.......I kind of see it as a cult classic waiting to happen especially if you look back on his early work fondly..........
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on Jan 24, 2020 22:01:53 GMT
If it's anything like Snatch or Lock, Stock... I'll be a happy camper caravan.
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jan 24, 2020 22:05:05 GMT
They lost me at Guy Ritche
|
|
morton
Based
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 2,954
|
Post by morton on Jan 24, 2020 22:23:47 GMT
A lot of people will hate this and yet........I kind of thought it rocked........it's ridiculously, convoluted and unbelievable but there is something to be said for all these men acting so manly and so un-PC, it's as close as you can get to The Dirty Dozen nowadays - if you break this down on a scene by scene level, every scene works even if it doesn't quite make sense. Even if it doesn't work you will watch to see how it plays out anyway.........like a greatest hits movie. All the acting is fine or better, but Hugh Grant steals the show in a part made for Gary Oldman if he was doing a stab at a Michael Caine attempt at the same role in 1972. Also: The best opening sequence in sometime (pre-credit/credit), great use of music including the best Roxy Music song ever used quite well (In Every Dream Home A Heartache) and a pacinoyes all time favorite to end the film. ~7...........you have to go along with it if not, this isn't you're kind of thing........I can see this getting a lot of one star reviews.......I kind of see it as a cult classic waiting to happen especially if you look back on his early work fondly.......... I know I spend too much time on social media because some of my thoughts when watching this were "yikes, that's probably going to start some discourse," lol. I enjoyed it for the most part though especially since my audience was really into it. Hugh Grant definitely stole the show, but I also loved Colin Farrell too and his little gang was fun albeit I'm glad Ritchie didn't overuse the Toddlers because they could have been really annoying. I really want a plaid jump suit now. Eddie Marsan was good in his small role. Michelle Dockery was fine. Charlie Hunnam was okay; although that one part was sort of eye rolling. I totally got why he hated junkies, but it was really hammy. Matthew McConaughey was like he was in one of his Lincoln commercials especially when he was reciting that chaos line, lol, but it still worked for me. Henry Golding was pretty weak, but he was still better than Jeremy Strong. I knew what he was going for, but I think there would have been stronger character actors that could have pulled it off.
|
|
Lubezki
Based
the social distancing
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 6,554
|
Post by Lubezki on Jan 24, 2020 22:51:29 GMT
It’s Guy Ritchie going back to basics and that’s what makes the film such a blast. Not quite as razor sharp and endlessly quotable as his earlier works but the script still maintains an effervescent flow and features some hilarious sequences that are vintage to Ritchie’s style. Hugh Grant is most definitely the scene stealer; brash, lewd, campy — one of his best roles to date. Can’t ignore the always reliable Colin Farrell either who was just as entertaining.
Overall, a welcome return to form for Ritchie. Solid 8.
|
|
|
Post by cheesecake on Jan 25, 2020 2:11:11 GMT
Went to see it last night but the projector was broken so they cancelled the screening.
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Jan 25, 2020 14:29:51 GMT
The reviews for this are pretty good up to now. Got me intrigued.
|
|
|
Post by Mattsby on Jan 26, 2020 19:35:12 GMT
That’s entertainment. A really fleet, fun time at the movies - it would probably sneak into my Top 10 of last year. 7.5/10
There’s a key line earlier in the movie about McConaghey’s rise - “He knew how to take advantage of his advantage.” That’s a lot of what the movie is looking at and playing with - characters thinking they have the upper hand against someone who genuinely does. So, most of the scenes and encounters are immediately tense. And there’s a freshness to Guy Ritchie’s writing/directing too - not just how he outlines a coiled, hypocritical class system, but how the act of storytelling itself functions and how it can weave around the truth. It’s also very funny….. and never tips too far from its tonal center. Whole cast delivers - even Charlie Hunnan who I’ve never liked before, McConaughey whose pride and experienced control licks an internalized stress, and the MVP a hilarious Hugh Grant - whose homoerotic Cockney talking to someone named Ray kept bringing to mind The Local Stigmatic - whose subtle, dithering confidence breaks in the later scenes when he goes beyond what he’s prepared. It’s another late-career triumph for him!
One flaw that bothered me - I really thought McCon and his wife character needed another scene or two together. Michelle Dockery is marvelous in her few moments and gets a great little line that sums up the movie - “There’s fuckery afoot.”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2020 19:43:09 GMT
Very entertaining and full of fun performances.
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on Jan 27, 2020 0:17:18 GMT
I thought this was a lot of fun! Definitely agree with a number of the posters in here saying it was a refreshing return to form for Guy Ritchie (certainly more entertaining than his big tentpole films that's for sure). Not on the same level as Snatch but still, The Gentlemen delivers in its own right and is wildly entertaining. Highly recommend seeing it in theaters for sure.
7.5/10
|
|
|
Post by thomasjerome on Feb 11, 2020 13:18:31 GMT
Okay, how come Hugh Grant and Colin Farrell have never been nominated for an Oscar?
Ritchie goes back to do what he does best and it's a welcome return. Not exactly Lock Stock/Snatch-level kind of film, there's nothing interesting about its cinematography or technical details or whatever but it's so much fun with all around entertaining characters. The last 30 minutes where everything falls into its place were particularly delicious to watch. The weakest side is surprisingly Matthew McConaughey as he almost sleepwalks through the whole film and you just don't get any intensity from his presence. He's unusually boring. Meanwhile, Charlie Hunnam is pretty good, Henry Golding plays a character he never played before and he leaves an impression. Wanted more of Dockery and as it was obvious from the trailers; Grant and Farrell once again prove that they're just amazingly talented character actors cursed with movie star looks. Both are phenomenal. Overall, I'm glad this is not just a crap they dumped on January. Great stuff.
|
|
LaraQ
Badass
English Rose
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 2,834
|
Post by LaraQ on Mar 26, 2020 18:43:43 GMT
I liked this way more than I was expecting to,it was hilarious,an absolute blast from start to finish.Loved Hugh Grant and Colin Farrell,even that walking breeze block Charlie Hunnam was pretty good.9/10.
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Mar 29, 2020 15:06:32 GMT
Saw it yesterday. It was fine in my opinion. Entertaining and funny, I had a good time watching it. The script was sharp and the performances pretty good. (Grant steals the show imo). What I didn't really like was all these subplots and explanation until we learn what we suspected from the beginning: Jeremy Strong's character organised all this in order to achieve a better buying price ... Not Richie's best but a very amusing movie nevertheless. ~7/10
|
|
|
Post by JangoB on Apr 5, 2020 11:59:07 GMT
I'm not a Guy Ritchie guy (ugh) by any means and I was very skeptical every time I looked at the high audience ratings on IMDB and its Russian equivalent but I gotta say, I thoroughly enjoyed the film. I can only assume that after diving into the world of soulless blockbusters for quite a long time Ritchie was craving going back to his roots, going back to what is obviously closest to his sensibilities - the guyz'n'geezers crime flick. And I think he made his best movie since "Snatch". It starts off as nothing but a small local-feeling crime comedy but as it goes on the story grows further and becomes more and more exciting and fun. And the characters are quite memorable indeed. All that silly attention (even awards-wise) Hugh Grant received for "Paddington 2" should absolutely be happening for this role but something tells me it wouldn't have happened even without the Covid problem. Which is a shame because Grant just steals the show, making me subconsciously wish that the movie got back to him whenever it focused on other characters. Thankfully they're all rather entertaining.
|
|
dazed
Based
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 1,785
|
Post by dazed on Apr 5, 2020 20:36:58 GMT
Loved the fuck out of this. Top tier Guy Ritchie. Up there with Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch.
Everyone was on their A game.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Apr 6, 2020 21:34:18 GMT
I liked it for what it was (although I feel like it lost some steam by the end), but let's be real: I need a spinoff movie about Coach and the Toddlers ASAP.
|
|
no
Badass
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 423
|
Post by no on Apr 7, 2020 2:00:29 GMT
Only film from Ritchie that I've liked is Aladdin
|
|
|
Post by cheesecake on Apr 7, 2020 5:47:10 GMT
Eh, it had its moments. The framing device got old fast but it looked like the cast were having fun. I thought Michelle Dockery was going to be in on it by the end because she was a nothing character throughout.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Apr 7, 2020 12:48:15 GMT
Eh, it had its moments. The framing device got old fast but it looked like the cast were having fun. I thought Michelle Dockery was going to be in on it by the end because she was a nothing character throughout. Yeah, this movie felt like it was building up to a reveal that Dockery was the one behind it all -- not because she was betraying Mickey, but because she knew that if he was out of the game, he would no longer be king of the jungle and would be discontented with a straight-and-narrow life. She orchestrated it all because she loved him for who he was and wanted to ensure his continued happiness. I know we can get burned out on twists real quick, but this movie almost demanded it, and for Hunnam to reveal this last piece of the puzzle to Grant in the cab would've been great.
|
|
|
Post by Miles Morales on Apr 7, 2020 13:45:54 GMT
Watched it 2 days ago and I really enjoyed it. The cast was excellent, especially Hugh Grant who was a blast. It's no masterpiece, but it's definitely great entertainment.
8.5/10
|
|
|
Post by Viced on Apr 23, 2020 15:33:22 GMT
Helluva lotta fun. The plot is definitely a little too convoluted, but it's always entertaining so it didn't really bother me too much.
But the main attraction is definitely the cast. Hugh Grant is legendary here tbh. The framing device would've grown tiresome if he wasn't so hilarious and awesome... he definitely kept this thing afloat. Loved Hunnam (great with Grant) and Farrell too. I agree with everyone that said Michelle Dockery wasn't in it enough. Apparently Kate Beckinsale was originally cast but dropped out after two weeks. So maybe that's the reason?
McConaughey had some good moments but I kept wondering why he was in this and why the character even needed to be American. Jude Law or almost any other British actor with some charisma between the age of 40ish-50ish would've been better.
|
|