|
Post by Martin Stett on Jun 10, 2022 21:10:32 GMT
And few hours ago, a man stabbed 5 people in a German university. That's a long way from double digit kills, though. What are the numbers on mass stabbing fatalities?
|
|
cherry68
Based
Man is unhappy because he doesn't know he's happy. It's only that.
Posts: 3,712
Likes: 2,132
|
Post by cherry68 on Jun 10, 2022 22:14:39 GMT
And few hours ago, a man stabbed 5 people in a German university. That's a long way from double digit kills, though. What are the numbers on mass stabbing fatalities? Idk, but I hear terrorists stabbing people in France quite often for instance. A knife is totally available to everyone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2022 16:30:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Jun 13, 2022 19:46:51 GMT
Sure, I mean what could possibly go wrong....... Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine is poised to sign a bill on Monday allowing teachers to carry guns in class after 24 hours of training, over opposition from teachers and a police group. Backers say the policy will make schools safer, but critics say that's not the case, citing experts' analysis. www.npr.org/2022/06/13/1104570419/ohio-dewine-guns-teachers
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jun 13, 2022 23:47:15 GMT
Turning schools into prisons and teachers into prison guards. Great idea. Very conducive to learning and development.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Jun 14, 2022 13:06:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Jun 14, 2022 13:07:18 GMT
Idk who needs to hear this but gun control takes the right of self defense out of the hands of the lower classes and places it exclusively in the hands of the elites who can hire private security No, it doesn’t
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Jun 14, 2022 13:10:53 GMT
WHAT DOES THAT EVEN LEAVE!?
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Jun 14, 2022 13:50:31 GMT
Well a lot of those things are getting into "let's just pass something right now!" that won't stand up if challenged in any way at all: You can't ban assault weapons for 18-21 year olds - I've said this before - that's a fake "solution" - you can't do anything on age(s) for a Constitutional right - that would be struck down in the first challenge and it would be challenged immediately.21 day waiting periods for that same age group is that way too......you'd have a better chance of 21 day waiting periods for everyone - but that would be a political issue not a judicial one...... .........and one of those things actually says "unconstitutional" IN the recommendation itself (Unconstitutional storage etc)- so that ain't happening either obviously......I get they want to pass what they can and take their chances with the Court.......but those 3 were pretty obvious non-starters.....
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Jun 14, 2022 14:16:11 GMT
pacinoyes can you please explain to me how it’s a “Constitutional Right” to own an assault weapon in general, and why there can’t be age restrictions on it if owning one will continue to be legal? I’m a gun owner myself and I can’t find a way to find any of these rejected measures to be unreasonable or unconstitutional.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Stett on Jun 14, 2022 14:19:24 GMT
pacinoyes can you please explain to me how it’s a “Constitutional Right” to own an assault weapon in general, and why there can’t be age restrictions on it if owning one will continue to be legal? I’m a gun owner myself and I can’t find a way to find any of these rejected measures to be unreasonable or unconstitutional. The guy who wrote in unconstitutional is a Republican, so I wouldn't take what he's saying at face value
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Jun 14, 2022 14:22:17 GMT
pacinoyes can you please explain to me how it’s a “Constitutional Right” to own an assault weapon in general, and why there can’t be age restrictions on it if owning one will continue to be legal? I’m a gun owner myself and I can’t find a way to find any of these rejected measures to be unreasonable or unconstitutional. The guy who wrote in unconstitutional is a Republican, so I wouldn't take what he's saying at face value Oh, I’m quite sure that was added by him or his party and not proposed in that manner. Pretty amusing to see it dismissed based on that wording alone.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Jun 14, 2022 14:24:49 GMT
pacinoyes can you please explain to me how it’s a “Constitutional Right” to own an assault weapon in general, and why there can’t be age restrictions on it if owning one will continue to be legal? I’m a gun owner myself and I can’t find a way to find any of these rejected measures to be unreasonable or unconstitutional. Well basically it's because where you identify adulthood. At 18 they get all the other adult Constitutional rights - except that one - to deny that one will be arbitrary against an adult and all the 18 year olds who do not break the law etc.. Now that doesn't meam we don't try to pass it - but it will never fly legally - in the long term. I think you would have a better case arguing that no one has don't have a "Constitutional Right" to own an assault rifle to begin with regardless of age.........but that's a political issue and gets into all kind of BS into how people can modify their guns etc. Here's a lower Court striking it down a a state level btw on ages - ages are the absolute deal-breaker: www.npr.org/2022/05/11/1098432386/california-21-gun-sales-ban-unconstitutional-court-says
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Jun 14, 2022 14:28:14 GMT
pacinoyes can you please explain to me how it’s a “Constitutional Right” to own an assault weapon in general, and why there can’t be age restrictions on it if owning one will continue to be legal? I’m a gun owner myself and I can’t find a way to find any of these rejected measures to be unreasonable or unconstitutional. Well basically it's because where you identify adulthood. At 18 they get all the other adult Constitutional rights - except that one - to deny that one will be arbitrary against an adult and all the 18 year olds who do not break the law etc.. Now that doesn't mean Courts don't try to pass it - but it will never fly legally - in the long term. I think you would have a better case arguing that no one has don't have a "Constitutional Right" to own an assault rifle to begin with regardless of age.........but that's a political issue and gets into all kind of BS into how people can modify their guns etc. Here's a lower Court striking it down a a state level btw on ages - ages are the absolute deal-breaker: www.npr.org/2022/05/11/1098432386/california-21-gun-sales-ban-unconstitutional-court-saysYou’d still be able to own a firearm at 18, such as a pistol or shotgun, so I’m just having a hard time buying the argument that one’s 2nd amendment right is denied solely on not being able to own an AR-15
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Jun 14, 2022 15:06:29 GMT
Well basically it's because where you identify adulthood. At 18 they get all the other adult Constitutional rights - except that one - to deny that one will be arbitrary against an adult and all the 18 year olds who do not break the law etc.. Now that doesn't mean Courts don't try to pass it - but it will never fly legally - in the long term. I think you would have a better case arguing that no one has don't have a "Constitutional Right" to own an assault rifle to begin with regardless of age.........but that's a political issue and gets into all kind of BS into how people can modify their guns etc. Here's a lower Court striking it down a a state level btw on ages - ages are the absolute deal-breaker: www.npr.org/2022/05/11/1098432386/california-21-gun-sales-ban-unconstitutional-court-saysYou’d still be able to own a firearm at 18, such as a pistol or shotgun, so I’m just having a hard time buying the argument that one’s 2nd amendment right is denied solely on not being able to own an AR-15 The senators said to protect the children from the wolves.
|
|