|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on Feb 13, 2023 5:10:27 GMT
Eagle fans are going to forget the fact that a man had possession and turned to go up field to get stripped that was called a no catch, and a "catch" where he bobbled it only to have possession with one foot in bounds.
I do agree that the holding (or was it PI?) call was meh, but hey, you got two big ones your way...
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Feb 13, 2023 14:26:16 GMT
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Feb 13, 2023 14:26:16 GMT
I agree it was technically a penalty but I don’t think it was egregious enough to throw a flag in that situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikediastavrone96 on Feb 13, 2023 16:08:30 GMT
|
|
ibbi
Based
"Batman's a scientist"
Posts: 4,958 
Likes: 4,461
|
Post by ibbi on Feb 13, 2023 19:39:04 GMT
I had no idea he was even there  it IS a pretty gross injustice that someone who played in those Broncos primetime games this season should be allowed a ring at the end of the season. |
|
urbanpatrician
Based
"I just wanna go back, back to 1999. back to hit me baby one more time" - Charli XCX
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 2,156
|
NFL.
Feb 14, 2023 8:59:30 GMT
Post by urbanpatrician on Feb 14, 2023 8:59:30 GMT
Philly's defense against mid to below Quarterbacks........... 15.25 points allowed
Philly's defense against good and above good Quarterbacks...... 33.4 points allowed
This isn't my take. It's Cowturd's.
But i just find it interesting - their defense was murdered by Goff, Dak, Rodgers, Heinicke, and Mahomes and were pretty good against everyone else. But those 5 games where they allowed 30+++ points (the only 5 where they were) are the games that matter.
I think it's evident that their defense is a bit underwhelming and probably needs to get better to take another stab at the Super Bowl. Slay doesn't play smart sometimes. Bradberry a shutdown corner??? I'm not sure about that, but their 10+++ sacks guys were such no shows yesterday that their secondary can't compensate for that egregious outing. Seems like their stats are inflated big time based on some really weak offensive lines they've played.
|
|
tep
Junior Member
formerly known as Ban
Posts: 455
Likes: 126
|
Post by tep on Feb 14, 2023 18:00:27 GMT
I’m not a football fan at all but I’m so happy Philly didn’t win
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Feb 14, 2023 21:01:15 GMT
Post by getclutch on Feb 14, 2023 21:01:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 1, 2023 15:31:06 GMT
Post by getclutch on Mar 1, 2023 15:31:06 GMT
|
|
ibbi
Based
"Batman's a scientist"
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 4,461
|
Post by ibbi on Mar 4, 2023 13:52:35 GMT
Who will sign 4 glasses of milk for their D-line? |
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 4, 2023 14:31:53 GMT
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Mar 4, 2023 14:31:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 4, 2023 16:31:58 GMT
ibbi likes this
Post by pacinoyes on Mar 4, 2023 16:31:58 GMT
Who will sign 4 glasses of milk for their D-line? This is so great.......looking forward to announcers saying "The defensive line is NOT booing him ........they're actually saying "Moo" |
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 4, 2023 16:58:28 GMT
Post by Joaquim on Mar 4, 2023 16:58:28 GMT
Who will sign 4 glasses of milk for their D-line? Excuse me? |
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 4, 2023 17:04:35 GMT
Post by Joaquim on Mar 4, 2023 17:04:35 GMT
I knew this QB class was awful but Jesus |
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 7, 2023 21:05:04 GMT
Post by getclutch on Mar 7, 2023 21:05:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 7, 2023 23:01:57 GMT
ibbi likes this
Post by Joaquim on Mar 7, 2023 23:01:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 10, 2023 22:37:56 GMT
Post by getclutch on Mar 10, 2023 22:37:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 10, 2023 23:11:57 GMT
Post by Joaquim on Mar 10, 2023 23:11:57 GMT
Absolute no brainer for the Bears. I don't even think Fields is the guy but he's still better than any of the QBs in this class will ever be. Can't believe people actually thought the Bears should trade Fields and draft one of these QBs at #1
Stetson Bennett may actually end up being the top QB in this draft and he's getting late round grades while the Panthers just traded up for one of the obvious busts
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 10, 2023 23:41:10 GMT
ibbi likes this
Post by theycallmemrfish on Mar 10, 2023 23:41:10 GMT
Congrats Bears fans!
BAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHA Panthers fans.
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 11, 2023 1:46:16 GMT
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Mar 11, 2023 1:46:16 GMT
LFG!!!!!
|
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 12, 2023 13:04:12 GMT
Post by Brother Fease on Mar 12, 2023 13:04:12 GMT
Absolute no brainer for the Bears. I don't even think Fields is the guy but he's still better than any of the QBs in this class will ever be. Can't believe people actually thought the Bears should trade Fields and draft one of these QBs at #1 Stetson Bennett may actually end up being the top QB in this draft and he's getting late round grades while the Panthers just traded up for one of the obvious busts I think the Bears brass believes they can develop Justin Fields more, if they give him more weapons and a better defense. A quarterbacks growth is pretty dependent on the structure around him. Trading out of the spot means they get access to more quality players. The only gamble here is: Are they passing up at the next Josh Allen, Joe Burrow, Patrick Mahomes or Jalen Hurts? |
|
ibbi
Based
"Batman's a scientist"
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 4,461
|
Post by ibbi on Mar 12, 2023 13:30:11 GMT
Absolute no brainer for the Bears. I don't even think Fields is the guy but he's still better than any of the QBs in this class will ever be. Can't believe people actually thought the Bears should trade Fields and draft one of these QBs at #1 Stetson Bennett may actually end up being the top QB in this draft and he's getting late round grades while the Panthers just traded up for one of the obvious busts I think the Bears brass believes they can develop Justin Fields more, if they give him more weapons and a better defense. A quarterbacks growth is pretty dependent on the structure around him. Trading out of the spot means they get access to more quality players. The only gamble here is: Are they passing up at the next Josh Allen, Joe Burrow, Patrick Mahomes or Jalen Hurts? There's no reason Fields can't be equally as effective as/better than Hurts with a comparable team around him. Whether the Bears have got a coaching staff capable of making all the pieces work is more the question. I feel like if you're going to get a guy like one of those other three then you'll either have a pretty good idea in advance if one is available (I don't think there is one this year?) or it's a total crapshoot and nobody could predict if they tried. |
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 12, 2023 13:51:46 GMT
ibbi likes this
Post by Brother Fease on Mar 12, 2023 13:51:46 GMT
I think the Bears brass believes they can develop Justin Fields more, if they give him more weapons and a better defense. A quarterbacks growth is pretty dependent on the structure around him. Trading out of the spot means they get access to more quality players. The only gamble here is: Are they passing up at the next Josh Allen, Joe Burrow, Patrick Mahomes or Jalen Hurts? There's no reason Fields can't be equally as effective as/better than Hurts with a comparable team around him. Whether the Bears have got a coaching staff capable of making all the pieces work is more the question. I feel like if you're going to get a guy like one of those other three then you'll either have a pretty good idea in advance if one is available (I don't think there is one this year?) or it's a total crapshoot and nobody could predict if they tried. Yes, the coaching staff is the key. The Bears have had a pretty poor record on developing quarterbacks. It makes no sense to hit the "reset button", especially since Fields was their best player last season. Now they have Mooney, Claypool, and Moore for their roster -- not bad.
Bryce Young, CJ Stroud, Will Levis, and Anthony Richardson have huge upside. There are obvious question marks, but I don't really see any serious red flags besides Richardson -- who is the riskiest prospect. Richardson probably has the best skill set, but at the same time, the most raw and the least experienced out of the bunch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joaquim on Mar 12, 2023 14:15:30 GMT
Absolute no brainer for the Bears. I don't even think Fields is the guy but he's still better than any of the QBs in this class will ever be. Can't believe people actually thought the Bears should trade Fields and draft one of these QBs at #1 Stetson Bennett may actually end up being the top QB in this draft and he's getting late round grades while the Panthers just traded up for one of the obvious busts The only gamble here is: Are they passing up at the next Josh Allen, Joe Burrow, Patrick Mahomes or Jalen Hurts? Not even remotely close, none of these guys pass the sniff test for me. That’s why the far better choice was to trade down and use that capital to keep building the team around Fields like you said |
|
|
|
NFL.
Mar 12, 2023 14:20:11 GMT
Post by Joaquim on Mar 12, 2023 14:20:11 GMT
Since we’re on the topic of the QBs in this draft class I’ll rank them
Stroud > Young > Richardson > Levis
|
|
|
|
Post by mikediastavrone96 on Mar 12, 2023 14:26:18 GMT
There's no reason Fields can't be equally as effective as/better than Hurts with a comparable team around him. Whether the Bears have got a coaching staff capable of making all the pieces work is more the question. I feel like if you're going to get a guy like one of those other three then you'll either have a pretty good idea in advance if one is available (I don't think there is one this year?) or it's a total crapshoot and nobody could predict if they tried. Bryce Young, CJ Stroud, Will Levis, and Anthony Richardson have huge upside. There are obvious question marks, but I don't really see any serious red flags besides Richardson
I think Young's size is a major red flag. Only 5'10" and even though he weighed at the combine at 204, his playing weight was closer to 194. That's too slight for the NFL when you have to look over 6'3"+ lineman and get sacked by 285 lbs manimals. |
|
it IS a pretty gross injustice that someone who played in those Broncos primetime games this season should be allowed a ring at the end of the season.
