|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Jun 2, 2022 18:55:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jun 2, 2022 19:00:23 GMT
what's been lost in this Depp fanboying/girling response is that the jury found them both guilty of defaming each other (Depp's winnings cancel out Heard's by a substantial margin but he was found guilty of defaming her too), so closer to what seems like the truth and closer to what I expressed a few pages ago when I said I wanted them both to lose. But instead you just see blanket dogpiling towards Heard and blanket lionization of a known drug/alcohol abuser who texted about fucking a woman's burnt corpse and cutting his own finger. I don't get it.
The narrative is that Depp won and Heard lost but the actual reality is that they're both abusive and now they both have court cases attesting to it. NEITHER of them should be getting work after this.
|
|
|
Post by RiverleavesElmius on Jun 2, 2022 19:37:52 GMT
what's been lost in this Depp fanboying/girling response is that the jury found them both guilty of defaming each other (Depp's winnings cancel out Heard's by a substantial margin but he was found guilty of defaming her too), so closer to what seems like the truth and closer to what I expressed a few pages ago when I said I wanted them both to lose. But instead you just see blanket dogpiling towards Heard and blanket lionization of a known drug/alcohol abuser who texted about fucking a woman's burnt corpse and cutting his own finger. I don't get it. The narrative is that Depp won and Heard lost but the actual reality is that they're both abusive and now they both have court cases attesting to it. NEITHER of them should be getting work after this. But he WILL be getting work after this, he will, and there's NOTHING you can do about it. So, again: BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Jun 2, 2022 20:06:19 GMT
what's been lost in this Depp fanboying/girling response is that the jury found them both guilty of defaming each other (Depp's winnings cancel out Heard's by a substantial margin but he was found guilty of defaming her too), so closer to what seems like the truth and closer to what I expressed a few pages ago when I said I wanted them both to lose. But instead you just see blanket dogpiling towards Heard and blanket lionization of a known drug/alcohol abuser who texted about fucking a woman's burnt corpse and cutting his own finger. I don't get it. The narrative is that Depp won and Heard lost but the actual reality is that they're both abusive and now they both have court cases attesting to it. NEITHER of them should be getting work after this. Heard won 2 mil because Depp's rep said she and friends trashed the place and they didn't. In Depp's case, the jury didn't believe he abused her so he won. At the end of the day amber is a liar. She had no credibility and the jury saw right through her.
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Jun 2, 2022 20:10:07 GMT
Good luck to her. Depp didn't care about money anyway. His goal was to set the record straight and that's what he did. Anyone who still believes Amber, well, get some critical thinking skills. DV victims do not act like Amber. They dont stare down the abuser and taunt them.
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jun 2, 2022 20:36:58 GMT
Heard won 2 mil because Depp's rep said she and friends trashed the place and they didn't. In Depp's case, the jury didn't believe he abused her so he won. At the end of the day amber is a liar. She had no credibility and the jury saw right through her. The court case attesting to Depp abusiveness is the UK libel case which validated 12 of Heard's 14 allegations. And that judge was in a better decision to be impartial than an un-sequestered jury in the misogynistic media circus that was this VA trial. Depp couldn't even appeal the UK verdict he had no chance of success but Heard probably will be successful in appealing. There's plenty of evidence that Depp was abusive and has been for a while. And it's crazy to me that people dismiss Heard's credibility (ok, fair) but then give ALL the benefit of the doubt to someone who's been documented as being a compulsive alcohol and drug abuser with an explosive temper, history of assault, incredibly violent texts. It's not even that people disbelieve Heard that I don't understand, it's that so many seem to be believing Depp with impunity. Like how the hell is this alcoholic maniac with paid witnesses in any way credible... But yeah, Heard did poop on a bed. What an evil witch.
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Jun 2, 2022 20:49:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ryan_MYeah on Jun 2, 2022 21:30:22 GMT
what's been lost in this Depp fanboying/girling response is that the jury found them both guilty of defaming each other (Depp's winnings cancel out Heard's by a substantial margin but he was found guilty of defaming her too), so closer to what seems like the truth and closer to what I expressed a few pages ago when I said I wanted them both to lose. But instead you just see blanket dogpiling towards Heard and blanket lionization of a known drug/alcohol abuser who texted about fucking a woman's burnt corpse and cutting his own finger. I don't get it. The narrative is that Depp won and Heard lost but the actual reality is that they're both abusive and now they both have court cases attesting to it. NEITHER of them should be getting work after this. But he WILL be getting work after this, he will, and there's NOTHING you can do about it. So, again: BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!! You know, there are other things you could be taking weird and wicked delight from than what somebody on a message board doesn’t like.
|
|
|
Post by RiverleavesElmius on Jun 2, 2022 21:31:55 GMT
But he WILL be getting work after this, he will, and there's NOTHING you can do about it. So, again: BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!! You know, there are other things you could be taking weird and wicked delight from than what somebody on a message board doesn’t like. Who says there aren't? I can walk & chew gum at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by RiverleavesElmius on Jun 2, 2022 21:33:49 GMT
WAAAH...WAAAH...WAAAH!! One for each pathetic, worthless, braindead, SJW virtue-signaling tweet. You're no good at LOSING, are you?
|
|
|
Post by RiverleavesElmius on Jun 2, 2022 21:37:16 GMT
Heard won 2 mil because Depp's rep said she and friends trashed the place and they didn't. In Depp's case, the jury didn't believe he abused her so he won. At the end of the day amber is a liar. She had no credibility and the jury saw right through her. The court case attesting to Depp abusiveness is the UK libel case which validated 12 of Heard's 14 allegations. And that judge was in a better decision to be impartial than an un-sequestered jury in the misogynistic media circus that was this VA trial. Depp couldn't even appeal the UK verdict he had no chance of success but Heard probably will be successful in appealing. There's plenty of evidence that Depp was abusive and has been for a while. And it's crazy to me that people dismiss Heard's credibility (ok, fair) but then give ALL the benefit of the doubt to someone who's been documented as being a compulsive alcohol and drug abuser with an explosive temper, history of assault, incredibly violent texts. It's not even that people disbelieve Heard that I don't understand, it's that so many seem to be believing Depp with impunity. Like how the hell is this alcoholic maniac with paid witnesses in any way credible... But yeah, Heard did poop on a bed. What an evil witch. He has ZERO history of assault. That's a LIE you pulled right out of your filthy ass! Ellen Barkin is a bitter, toxic has-been with ZERO credibility to anyone who follows her Twitter feed. ALL his previous girlfriends say he was NEVER violent with them.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Jun 2, 2022 22:23:08 GMT
Heard won 2 mil because Depp's rep said she and friends trashed the place and they didn't. In Depp's case, the jury didn't believe he abused her so he won. At the end of the day amber is a liar. She had no credibility and the jury saw right through her. The court case attesting to Depp abusiveness is the UK libel case which validated 12 of Heard's 14 allegations. And that judge was in a better decision to be impartial than an un-sequestered jury in the misogynistic media circus that was this VA trial. Depp couldn't even appeal the UK verdict he had no chance of success but HeardT probably will be successful in appealing. There's plenty of evidence that Depp was abusive and has been for a while. And it's crazy to me that people dismiss Heard's credibility (ok, fair) but then give ALL the benefit of the doubt to someone who's been documented as being a compulsive alcohol and drug abuser with an explosive temper, history of assault, incredibly violent texts. It's not even that people disbelieve Heard that I don't understand, it's that so many seem to be believing Depp with impunity. Like how the hell is this alcoholic maniac with paid witnesses in any way credible... But yeah, Heard did poop on a bed. What an evil witch. There are major issues with the UK libel case, most notably the Judge, Andrew Nichol who gave the verdict having a direct conflict of interest because his son works directly with the Sun Journalist Dan Wooton who posted the allegation of Depp being a "wife beater" works with his son at Talk Radio, also owned by the Sun owner Rupert Murdoch's company News Corp .In any fair judiciary, that Judge should never have been allowed to pass judgment on Depp's case due to a clear conflict of interest, yet it happened anyway. He should have been recused or recused himself. I feel like the verdict of a Jury of 7 people that both sides vetted before the trial, has more weight than a single Judge whose son is basically employed by the organisation Depp was fighting his libel case against. intelligenceuk.com/index.php/2021/08/20/johnny-depp-is-another-victim-of-the-corrupt-uk-justice-system/
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Jun 2, 2022 23:57:09 GMT
The court case attesting to Depp abusiveness is the UK libel case which validated 12 of Heard's 14 allegations. And that judge was in a better decision to be impartial than an un-sequestered jury in the misogynistic media circus that was this VA trial. Depp couldn't even appeal the UK verdict he had no chance of success but HeardT probably will be successful in appealing. There's plenty of evidence that Depp was abusive and has been for a while. And it's crazy to me that people dismiss Heard's credibility (ok, fair) but then give ALL the benefit of the doubt to someone who's been documented as being a compulsive alcohol and drug abuser with an explosive temper, history of assault, incredibly violent texts. It's not even that people disbelieve Heard that I don't understand, it's that so many seem to be believing Depp with impunity. Like how the hell is this alcoholic maniac with paid witnesses in any way credible... But yeah, Heard did poop on a bed. What an evil witch. There are major issues with the UK libel case, most notably the Judge, Andrew Nichol who gave the verdict having a direct conflict of interest because his son works directly with the Sun Journalist Dan Wooton who posted the allegation of Depp being a "wife beater" works with his son at Talk Radio, also owned by the Sun owner Rupert Murdoch's company News Corp .In any fair judiciary, that Judge should never have been allowed to pass judgment on Depp's case due to a clear conflict of interest, yet it happened anyway. He should have been recused or recused himself. I feel like the verdict of a Jury of 7 people that both sides vetted before the trial, has more weight than a single Judge whose son is basically employed by the organisation Depp was fighting his libel case against. intelligenceuk.com/index.php/2021/08/20/johnny-depp-is-another-victim-of-the-corrupt-uk-justice-system/it's a hard situation because a lot of people dont want to admit that she lied. She's on tape admitting that she lied in order to TRO. But where is her evidence? Amber was right though there are some people who will believe she was abused because she's a woman period. Then you have people who believe he beat her because he's a mess. However, not once in the recording did you hear him abuse her. Not once. She tried to gaslight him but it didn't work. So when Amber's sister gets upset at her and has finally had enough and admits that amber is abusive then what excuse will people say next time? I feel bad for her sister. She endured her abuse and was under duress to perjury herself. Hopefully, when the truth is revealed, they dont file charges. One thing is clear though, we have not heard the end of Amber's abuse, she will do it again...she can't help it.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Jun 4, 2022 9:01:35 GMT
Yeah, judging by this crowd reaction Depp got on the Glasgow leg of his tour with Jeff Beck, Depp can probably become a big movie star again if he makes some smart choices (and if studios let him back to his marquee franchise roles like Jack Sparrow) and sobers up and learns his lines. He's a nearly 60 old actor who has seen better days, yet that crowd is acting like he's The Beatles or something.
|
|
|
Post by stabcaesar on Jun 4, 2022 9:33:35 GMT
There's plenty of evidence that Depp was abusive and has been for a while. And it's crazy to me that people dismiss Heard's credibility (ok, fair) but then give ALL the benefit of the doubt to someone who's been documented as being a compulsive alcohol and drug abuser with an explosive temper, history of assault, incredibly violent texts. It's not even that people disbelieve Heard that I don't understand, it's that so many seem to be believing Depp with impunity. Like how the hell is this alcoholic maniac with paid witnesses in any way credible...
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Jun 4, 2022 16:54:53 GMT
Yeah, judging by this crowd reaction Depp got on the Glasgow leg of his tour with Jeff Beck, Depp can probably become a big movie star again if he makes some smart choices (and if studios let him back to his marquee franchise roles like Jack Sparrow) and sobers up and learns his lines. He's a nearly 60 old actor who has seen better days, yet that crowd is acting like he's The Beatles or something. Meanwhile, the only people waiting outside for Amber are process servers.
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Jun 4, 2022 17:22:59 GMT
There's plenty of evidence that Depp was abusive and has been for a while. And it's crazy to me that people dismiss Heard's credibility (ok, fair) but then give ALL the benefit of the doubt to someone who's been documented as being a compulsive alcohol and drug abuser with an explosive temper, history of assault, incredibly violent texts. It's not even that people disbelieve Heard that I don't understand, it's that so many seem to be believing Depp with impunity. Like how the hell is this alcoholic maniac with paid witnesses in any way credible... Let's ask Elon Musk about Amber's credibility, you know since when he was dating her he sported bruises also.
|
|
|
Post by akittystang on Jun 7, 2022 10:03:25 GMT
I'm not a huge Depp fan but there is little that pisses me off more than people faking abuse for financial gain and/or fame. I think the verdict was fair. Those of us in the USA live in a country that is misogynistic, yes. Totally agree. This verdict had nothing to do with misogyny. Of the two people involved in this shitshow only one was ever arrested for domestic violence (Amber Heard). To the best of my knowledge, there are no claims against Johnny Depp of abuse. Amber is the only one. In the UK Johnny Depp was not suing Amber Heard but a tabloid, The Sun. Some of you have been flippant about the jury in this case but the case in the UK was ruled by a single judge who had ties to Rupert Murdoch who also owns "The Sun". People like to throw around the term "imperfect victim" but that title only seems to apply to women. It could easily apply to Depp. She is on tape admitting that she hit him, but not in a "full punch". In that same recording, I believe she also says she can't promise there wouldn't be physical violence again or words to that effect. If you believe Depp, she severed his finger. People like to point to that TMZ video where Johnny Depp is pissed off (I can't make out exactly why) and appears to be kicking a kitchen cabinet and some suggest it points to abuse. Abuse of what? Kitchen cabinets? She was trying to suggest it was something that it wasn't. Why was she filming this at all? Because it was clear to her that she was going to get a divorce and she wanted a big payday. Her own law firm that handled her divorce seemed to say that as well. She wanted a car and continued mortgage and utility payments on three separate penthouses in Los Angeles. Yet she stated: "I wanted nothing." How people continue to believe her after everything that's come out is, to me, mind-boggling. The only thing I can come up with is that her story fits into a popular narrative and the #MeToo movement, a movement that should really try to do better to shield itself against people like Amber Heard, who make up stories for higher divorce settlements and/or media attention. The #BelieveAllWomen mindset some have I think is just absurd. Some women have lied about various abuses. It's just a fact. ( Does anyone that buys into that narrative remember that infamous Rolling Stone article, Tawana Brawley, or The Duke Lacrosse Case?) Amber Heard is an example of why some people don't believe people coming forward with claims of abuse. She is a perpetrator, a grifter, and a liar. (Also, forgot to add, pledging to donate and an actual donation are obviously not the same thing.)
|
|
|
Post by PromNightCarrie on Jun 7, 2022 12:01:49 GMT
I'm not rolling with this narrative of "imperfect victim" (tell me you're just excusing her being an unconvincing liar on the stand) and setting back #metoo (how did it go from getting swine like Harvey Weinstein with 80-something accusers out of here to #believeallwomen which is a dangerous mindset?). And it's ironic that these mainstream op-eds are discussing social media anti-Heard bias when they've had anti-Depp bias since before trial too. When the world saw the kitchen cabinet video, we were taken aback. But she didn't send to TMZ the full video where after he spots the camera, she's snickering and smiling and he says "I'm outta here" and walks past her. She's a world-class manipulator. In the UK, He was fighting a losing battle taking on a paper owned by the most powerful man in media. I don't know why he even bothered. Tabloids there run things to the point where the royal family has to bow down and host parties for them. It's a joke. But one thing shocked me. There is a photo from when they were on a cruise that featured Johnny with dark bruises on his face. Amber has claimed they were photoshopped. But I swear to you, I remember seeing this photo while they were still together and saying, "Why does Johnny have black eyes?" I completely forgot about it until I saw this picture come up in trial.
|
|
|
Post by akittystang on Jun 7, 2022 12:46:09 GMT
But one thing shocked me. There is a photo from when they were on a cruise that featured Johnny with dark bruises on his face. Amber has claimed they were photoshopped. But I swear to you, I remember seeing this photo while they were still together and saying, "Why does Johnny have black eyes?" I completely forgot about it until I saw this picture come up in trial. Of course she did. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here but somewhere I read that she didn't even have to show up for this appearance regarding a restraining order in May 2016 against Johnny Depp. Yet she not only showed up, TMZ was alerted that she would be there. Would someone in a domestic violence situation who has recently been beaten actually want to face this crazy media situation unless they absolutely had to (or their abuser). An employee at TMZ who testified at the trial and implied it was Amber or someone on her team that leaked it to the press to be there. Here is a picture from the hearing regarding the restraining order: Here is a picture that was taken the following day: I think we all know what's missing in the second photo that should be there.
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Jun 14, 2022 14:40:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Jun 14, 2022 15:09:46 GMT
But one thing shocked me. There is a photo from when they were on a cruise that featured Johnny with dark bruises on his face. Amber has claimed they were photoshopped. But I swear to you, I remember seeing this photo while they were still together and saying, "Why does Johnny have black eyes?" I completely forgot about it until I saw this picture come up in trial. Of course she did. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here but somewhere I read that she didn't even have to show up for this appearance regarding a restraining order in May 2016 against Johnny Depp. Yet she not only showed up, TMZ was alerted that she would be there. Would someone in a domestic violence situation who has recently been beaten actually want to face this crazy media situation unless they absolutely had to (or their abuser). An employee at TMZ who testified at the trailer implied it was Amber or someone on her team that leaked it to the press to be there. Here is a picture from the hearing regarding the restraining order: Here is a picture that was taken the following day: I think we all know what's missing in the second photo that should be there. That's right, she didn't have to go. I believe the plastic surgery bruising theory. We all know she got cheek implants.
|
|
|
Post by RiverleavesElmius on Jun 14, 2022 17:38:16 GMT
The whole enlightened world in unison: "Shut up, CUNT!" 🤣🖕🤣 What a disingenuous, transparently phony & dishonest piece of shit. The Amy Dunne comparisons might have been too kind...cuz Amy was actually an EXCELLENT actress/LIAR.
|
|
|
Post by quetee on Jun 16, 2022 18:59:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Mattsby on Aug 10, 2022 18:44:55 GMT
Jeanne du Barry underway..... Depp as Louis XV
|
|