|
|
Post by therealcomicman117 on Apr 4, 2018 23:39:39 GMT
Gosling, Jake deserves a second nomination at least.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Apr 4, 2018 23:44:37 GMT
Hardy > Gosling > Gyllenhaal >>>>>>> Fassbender
|
|
LaraQ
Badass
English Rose
Posts: 2,299 
Likes: 2,833
|
Post by LaraQ on Apr 5, 2018 0:00:37 GMT
Gyllenhaal.He was robbed of a nomination for both Nightcrawler and Stronger.   |
|
|
|
Post by DeepArcher on Apr 5, 2018 0:09:30 GMT
I don't know why this matters, I'm just going to rank them by order of preference:
1. Gosling
2. Hardy
3. Gyllenhaal
4. Fassbender
|
|
|
|
Post by Kings_Requiem on Apr 5, 2018 0:10:26 GMT
Gyllenhaal
Gosling
Hardy
Fassbender
|
|
thomasjerome
Based
Posts: 3,122 
Likes: 2,746
Member is Online
|
Post by thomasjerome on Apr 5, 2018 0:12:35 GMT
Gyllenhaal
Fassbender
Gosling
Hardy
|
|
|
|
Post by Mattsby on Apr 5, 2018 0:29:37 GMT
I rank 'em... Gosling, Fassbender, Gyllenhaal, Hardy.
Foreseeably, Gosling is closest to an Oscar this year with First Man, I think. Who are the other threats in lead this year...Bale? Carell?
|
|
|
|
Post by MoonShadow on Apr 5, 2018 0:48:03 GMT
Gosling  |
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Apr 5, 2018 0:48:29 GMT
I like them all and actually see inspired and deep subtext in the best performances of Hardy and Fassbender that I don't necessarily see as much in Gosling or Gyllenhaal but those guys have a consistency that's hard to match and admirable and tends to ingratiate itself to the Academy.
Like I know why people maybe wouldn't like Fassbender but couldn't understand anyone not liking Gosling.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Pavan on Apr 5, 2018 7:47:39 GMT
Gosling> Hardy> Gyllenhaal > Fassbender
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny_Hellzapoppin on Apr 5, 2018 8:04:40 GMT
Based on what they've done so far... Gosling would be my choice, as despite his unworthy La La Land nomination, he is still under nominated and should have won in 2007 when he wasn't even nominated. Hardy is under nominated too. I feel he should be a two time nominee, rather than a one time nominee for a completely meh piece of work. Of the four actors, he's the one I dig the most, although I think Gosling is the superior actor at the moment. Gyllenhaal is a very similar case to Hardy. I figure he should be a two time nominee at this point, and again, his actual nomination isn't one of the two I refer to. On a non acting note, something about the guy just irks me a bit, so I don't really have that thing I have with the above two guys, whereby I would actively like to see them win. Fassbender  |
|
|
|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Apr 5, 2018 8:06:46 GMT
FASSY
HARDY
GYLLENHAAL
GOSLING
|
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on Apr 5, 2018 15:37:16 GMT
Gosling will most likely get some Oscar buzz for First Man this year .
1. Gosling
2. Hardy
3. Gyllenhaal
4. Fassbender
|
|
|
|
Post by notacrook on Apr 5, 2018 18:46:52 GMT
1) Gyllenhaal
2) Gosling
3) Hardy
4) Fassbender
All fantastic actors on a very similar level. Not much between Gyllenhaal and Fassbender.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmalone on Apr 5, 2018 20:34:50 GMT
Whoever gives the best performance of a year in one of the two categories.
|
|
speeders
Based
Posts: 4,093
Likes: 2,211
|
Post by speeders on Apr 5, 2018 21:11:08 GMT
Gosling
Gyllenhaal
Fassbender
Hardy
|
|
|
|
Post by bob-coppola on Apr 5, 2018 21:15:31 GMT
For me it's:
1. Gosling: the best and most versatile actor of his age range, he's done many genres and styles of movie and all very well. I nominate him for Drive, The Nice Guys, Blue Valentine, Lars and The Real Girl, Crazy Stupid Love and The Ides of March.
2. Fassbender: very close to Gosling. He's not as versatile, he can't do comedy, and he can bring so much depth into his dramatic roles. He was robbed a win for Jobs, and deserves nominations for Shame, Hunger, Prometheus, Fish Tank and Jane Eyre.
3. Gyllenhaal: of all of them, he gave the best performance in Nightcrawler, but has his own share of dumpsters. He can't really elevate a weak screenplay and fall into some histrionic traps if there's not a good director around. He can be found in my line-ups with Nightcrawler, Nocturnal Animals, Prisoners and Brokeback Mountain.
4. Hardy: I like him less than most people on this board, but that doesn't mean I find him to be bad. He's nom-worthy in The Revenant, Locke and Legend. Not win-worthy yet, can be quite wooden and is hugely overrated in his Christopher Nolan directed performances, but he's indeed talented.
|
|
|
|
Post by countjohn on Apr 5, 2018 21:25:15 GMT
Fassbender is way ahead of the rest of those guys, who are all just okay to me. I guess I like Hardy the best of the other three just because he's so good in the tough guy roles, but he hasn't impressed me in much else.
|
|
|
|
Post by FrancescoAbides on Apr 5, 2018 21:27:58 GMT
Tom Goddamn Hardy >>> Ryan Goddamn Gosling >>> Jake Goddamn G >>>> Michael Fine Fassbender
|
|
|
|
Post by Tommen_Saperstein on Apr 6, 2018 7:59:03 GMT
just going off talent, Hardy, then Fassbender, then Gyllenhaal, then Gosling.
Of all their combined nominations, Hardy is the only one that deserved to win. (I guess Fassbender too, because the 2015 best actor lineup was absolute shit)
|
|
|
|
Post by scorpio68 on Apr 19, 2018 9:59:36 GMT
Gyllenhaal, worthy for Brokeback Mountain alone
|
|
|
|
Post by isabelaolive on Oct 16, 2019 15:59:40 GMT
Gyllenhaal
Fassbender
Hardy
Gosling
|
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Oct 16, 2019 16:33:39 GMT
Hardy
Fassbender
Gosling
Gyllenhaal
|
|
thomasjerome
Based
Posts: 3,122
Likes: 2,746
Member is Online
|
Post by thomasjerome on Oct 16, 2019 17:53:01 GMT
Gyllenhaal
Fassbender
Gosling
Hardy
|
|
|
|
Post by tastytomatoes on Oct 16, 2019 20:31:47 GMT
Gyllenhaal
Hardy
Fassbender
Gosling
|
|
