|
Post by HELENA MARIA on Oct 13, 2019 20:19:29 GMT
...
|
|
|
Post by futuretrunks on Oct 13, 2019 20:28:46 GMT
Possibly. I feel like her acting highlight might still be Super 8.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Oct 13, 2019 21:51:59 GMT
Too early to say. She's young and somewhat typecast as these sort of ethereal dream girls or whatever. And she is losing effectiveness because of that. She's done some good work, but needs to break out of the box the industry has put her in. So, unsure.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Oct 13, 2019 21:54:31 GMT
Eh, depends on the metric you're using. I think she's a far bigger talent than people give her credit for (and seriously, has any actor racked up the number of auteurs she has by her age; sure, she started young but goddamn), but it can also be said that she's overexposed. I will say that I like her more than most.
|
|
|
Post by hugobolso on Oct 14, 2019 4:53:15 GMT
No. I mean she was never Oscar nominated, not even nominated for a trully important award.. She isn't even the main lead of a huge blockbuster or a Best Picture Acadamy nominee.- For being overated, at first you have to gain recognition. That's why Saoirse Ronan or Margot Robbie could be overated actresses, because both had important recognition by their peers and critics.
Elle's sister Dakota because the praise she won as a child, we could talk about if she is an underated or overated actress.-
Elle Fanning is choosen by A Directors and Producers, but still, we could discuss why she is cast, but not if she is underated or overated. She still not in the radar right now.- But still she was only cast in 2 big box office movies Super 8 and Maleficent. For being Maleficent a hit, she reprised her role.- Yep she is one of Sophia Coppola iconic actress, but Sophia Coppola movies don't make money, and she hasn't sell them well.- She isn't an it girl, she isn't on the spotlight
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Oct 14, 2019 5:32:42 GMT
It's too early to say.
|
|
|
Post by urbanpatrician on Oct 14, 2019 5:46:25 GMT
No, she's not rated at all actually. There's no acclaim surrounding her.
I have no idea how overexposed she is. I barely pay attention to media on new released movies. Like... I dunno.... I feel like TV doesn't advertise movies well enough or wide enough in general, but maybe that's another discussion.
I think she'd be a better Lux Lisbon than Dunst was in The Virgin Suicides. I could also see her playing Tracey better than Evan Rachel Wood in Thirteen, but poor girl was just born 15 years too late.
|
|
|
Post by isabelaolive on Oct 15, 2019 21:21:22 GMT
No. She is not widely recognized in the industry, although she has worked with a big number of prominent directors, has never received oscar buzz for any performance and most people consider her to be an average actress. She may be overexposed, but I don't think she's overrated as an actress.
|
|