|
Post by JangoB on Oct 11, 2019 16:22:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Oct 11, 2019 16:36:56 GMT
About time. They've been talking this up for over a decade.
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on Oct 11, 2019 16:48:03 GMT
Oh, fuck you Apple...
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Oct 11, 2019 17:08:04 GMT
I'm not a fan of war films/series but the best work I've seen on the genre is by far Band of Brothers.
Always thought I should watch the Pacific. Maybe before Masters of the Air...
|
|
|
Post by JangoB on Oct 11, 2019 17:41:46 GMT
I'm not a fan of war films/series but the best work I've seen on the genre is by far Band of Brothers. Always thought I should watch the Pacific. Maybe before Masters of the Air... If you liked Band of Brothers then definitely check out The Pacific. I thought they were pretty close in terms of quality and between the two shows it's The Pacific that I think features the strongest episode.
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Oct 11, 2019 17:50:33 GMT
I'm not a fan of war films/series but the best work I've seen on the genre is by far Band of Brothers. Always thought I should watch the Pacific. Maybe before Masters of the Air... If you liked Band of Brothers then definitely check out The Pacific. I thought they were pretty close in terms of quality and between the two shows it's The Pacific that I think features the strongest episode. Actually I have decided to watch it since I saw BoB (about 4 years ago). But I just don't!! I will eventually. That's exactly what I do with the tv series. If I don't watch them when they first air, I do it much later.
|
|
|
Post by ibbi on Oct 11, 2019 18:57:55 GMT
Glad they're doing a third part, but not sure why they have to go to Apple?! Also, it sounds lame. But I'll watch it anyway, and I'm sure it'll be awesome.
|
|
|
Post by JangoB on Nov 9, 2023 14:22:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Nov 9, 2023 16:43:29 GMT
Ngl, I didn't buy this dude as Elvis any more than I buy 3/5ths of the FakeElvis dudes in Vegas much less do I guy him remotely here as a "man" and yet........ on some level I'm hoping the mods unlock that "Is Austin Butler Hot" thread just so I can work through some disturbing memories of a towel snapping locker room incident from 10th grade
|
|
|
Post by ibbi on Nov 9, 2023 16:49:49 GMT
Yesssssssssss! People shit on The Pacific, but that thing was wonderful. The fact that there still appear to be some names carrying over from those projects to this gives reason to hope. Looks good, and definitely looks suitably huge.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Nov 9, 2023 16:59:07 GMT
Looks good.
Butler's agent steered him immaculately post-Elvis (the best starmaking performance of the last decade, imho). .... Dune 2, The Bikeriders, Masters Of The Air.
He's going to be incredibly hard to derail as Hollywood's "chosen one" for the next 2 decades, with the likes of Leo, Pitt, Clooney, Damon etc no longer spring chickens. Dude's basically the complete package. And and acclaimed Broadway stage actor as well.
|
|
|
Post by Pittsnogle_Goggins on Nov 9, 2023 18:30:52 GMT
Looks good. Butler's agent steered him immaculately post-Elvis (the best starmaking performance of the last decade, imho). .... Dune 2, The Bikeriders, Masters Of The Air.
He's going to be incredibly hard to derail as Hollywood's "chosen one" for the next 2 decades, with the likes of Leo, Pitt, Clooney, Damon etc no longer spring chickens. Dude's basically the complete package. And and acclaimed Broadway stage actor as well.I mean let’s see if he can open on move based on his name first. Sure, Elvis was a huge hit, but its success was similar to an IP, people went to see it because they love Elvis. Now I like Butler and anm excited about his upcoming projects, it’s just a bit premature to anoint him as Hollywood’s leading man for the next decade.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Nov 9, 2023 18:41:37 GMT
Looks good. Butler's agent steered him immaculately post-Elvis (the best starmaking performance of the last decade, imho). .... Dune 2, The Bikeriders, Masters Of The Air.
He's going to be incredibly hard to derail as Hollywood's "chosen one" for the next 2 decades, with the likes of Leo, Pitt, Clooney, Damon etc no longer spring chickens. Dude's basically the complete package. And and acclaimed Broadway stage actor as well.I mean let’s see if he can open on move based on his name first. Sure, Elvis was a huge hit, but its success was similar to an IP, people went to see it because they love Elvis. Now I like Butler and anm excited about his upcoming projects, it’s just a bit premature to anoint him as Hollywood’s leading man for the next decade. Has Timothee Chalamet opened any movie based on his name first yet? Not really. Dune was a success, but it's a recognisable sci-fi IP. If Willy Wonka is a hit, the IP will play a huge part. Yet Chalamet is also positioned to be given the keys to Hollywood leading man parts for the next decade or two. It's incredibly obvious when someone is going to become a " chosen one" in the movie industry. That's how this works. Butler has already done that hard part as far as the Hollywood powers that be are concerned. He's been the lead in a big movie and has the acting cred, with the Oscar nod etc. Gotten co-signed by acting legends. He also "looks" like a "movie star". He'll get chance after chance after chance to get in hit films. He may have a few flops along the way, but so did Clooney, Pitt, Damon, Depp etc. Hollywood will make Butler your next iconic movie star or die trying.
|
|
|
Post by theycallmemrfish on Nov 9, 2023 20:36:47 GMT
Wasn't so much a trailer as it is an acting reel for Butler...
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Nov 9, 2023 20:39:21 GMT
Looks good. Butler's agent steered him immaculately post-Elvis (the best starmaking performance of the last decade, imho). .... Dune 2, The Bikeriders, Masters Of The Air.
He's going to be incredibly hard to derail as Hollywood's "chosen one" for the next 2 decades, with the likes of Leo, Pitt, Clooney, Damon etc no longer spring chickens. Dude's basically the complete package. And and acclaimed Broadway stage actor as well.He's off to a good start for sure. I still haven't been wowed by him yet, but he's hungry and he wants it, and ambition is key. This kid has the fire in his belly and it's good to see.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Nov 9, 2023 20:42:31 GMT
I mean let’s see if he can open on move based on his name first. Sure, Elvis was a huge hit, but its success was similar to an IP, people went to see it because they love Elvis. Now I like Butler and anm excited about his upcoming projects, it’s just a bit premature to anoint him as Hollywood’s leading man for the next decade. Has Timothee Chalamet opened any movie based on his name first yet? Not really. Dune was a success, but it's a recognisable sci-fi IP. If Willy Wonka is a hit, the IP will play a huge part. Yet Chalamet is also positioned to be given the keys to Hollywood leading man parts for the next decade or two. It's incredibly obvious when someone is going to become a " chosen one" in the movie industry. That's how this works. Butler has already done that hard part as far as the Hollywood powers that be are concerned. He's been the lead in a big movie and has the acting cred, with the Oscar nod etc. Gotten co-signed by acting legends. He also "looks" like a "movie star". He'll get chance after chance after chance to get in hit films. He may have a few flops along the way, but so did Clooney, Pitt, Damon, Depp etc. Hollywood will make Butler your next iconic movie star or die trying. To be fair, Butler hasn't opened a movie solely on his name, either. Elvis is a biopic about the biggest musical star of the century (which is its own IP/existing brand recognition) directed by Baz Luhrmann and co-starring Tom Hanks. It certainly propelled Butler for sure, but he still also has to open a project on his name that doesn't carry that weight of pre-existing fandoms. The Bikeriders will be that test.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Nov 9, 2023 20:55:56 GMT
Has Timothee Chalamet opened any movie based on his name first yet? Not really. Dune was a success, but it's a recognisable sci-fi IP. If Willy Wonka is a hit, the IP will play a huge part. Yet Chalamet is also positioned to be given the keys to Hollywood leading man parts for the next decade or two. It's incredibly obvious when someone is going to become a " chosen one" in the movie industry. That's how this works. Butler has already done that hard part as far as the Hollywood powers that be are concerned. He's been the lead in a big movie and has the acting cred, with the Oscar nod etc. Gotten co-signed by acting legends. He also "looks" like a "movie star". He'll get chance after chance after chance to get in hit films. He may have a few flops along the way, but so did Clooney, Pitt, Damon, Depp etc. Hollywood will make Butler your next iconic movie star or die trying. To be fair, Butler hasn't opened a movie solely on his name, either. Elvis is a biopic about the biggest musical star of the century (which is its own IP/existing brand recognition) directed by Baz Luhrmann and co-starring Tom Hanks. It certainly propelled Butler for sure, but he still also has to open a project on his name that doesn't carry that weight of pre-existing fandoms. The Bikeriders will be that test. I know that already about Butler. That was the point Pittsnogle_Goggins was making, and I wasn't disagreeing with it. Elvis is an IP of sorts (though if his performance wasn't so strongly reviewed, it still could have flopped). I was just pointing out that everyone seems to have accepted that Hollywood has decided Chalamet will be one of the premiere next generation leading men/movie stars, when he hasn't carried a single hit film of his name alone either. The Industry believes in his talent and star quality, so they will keep putting him in things designed to do well, even if it requires known IP to do so ( ie Dune, Wonka).So why on earth wouldn't the same approach apply to Butler, who if anything feels like an even more natural fit to Hollywood's search for the next generation of movie stars than Chalamet. Butler will be given a lot of help along the way. Elvis and his general reputation as a nice guy and a dedicated actor has engendered a lot of good will. I don't think The Bikeriders will be a test of much. It's a Jeff Nichols mid-budget drama, and they aren't exactly known to be money-spinners ( ie Mud, Loving ). That's a project that needed to do well for Butler critically, which it has. Whether it makes money or not won't make much difference to his trajectory, imho. Whatever big studio project he's lined up to lead will be his test. But again, like with Chalamet, studios may just give him projects with recognisable IP's, so there's not much of a test to face.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Nov 9, 2023 21:05:17 GMT
To be fair, Butler hasn't opened a movie solely on his name, either. Elvis is a biopic about the biggest musical star of the century (which is its own IP/existing brand recognition) directed by Baz Luhrmann and co-starring Tom Hanks. It certainly propelled Butler for sure, but he still also has to open a project on his name that doesn't carry that weight of pre-existing fandoms. The Bikeriders will be that test. I know that already about Butler. That was the point Pittsnogle_Goggins was making, and I wasn't disagreeing with it. Elvis is an IP of sorts (though if his performance wasn't so strongly reviewed, it still could have flopped). I was just pointing out that everyone seems to have accepted that Hollywood has decided Chalamet will be one of the premiere next generation leading men/movie stars, when he hasn't carried a single hit film of his name alone either. The Industry believes in his talent and star quality, so they will keep putting him in things designed to do well, even if it requires known IP to do so ( ie Dune, Wonka).So why on earth wouldn't the same approach apply to Butler, who if anything feels like an even more natural fit to Hollywood's search for the next generation of movie stars than Chalamet. Butler will be given a lot of help along the way. Elvis and his general reputation as a nice guy and a dedicated actor has engendered a lot of good will. I mean, it depends on your definition of hit. Call Me By Your Name made a very strong box office for Chalamet's big debut for a tiny indie movie with a shoestring budget. Armie Hammer was the biggest name associated with it at the time, but he's not exactly Tom Hanks. But Chalamet got the Oscar nomination, the film did very well, and he got a headstart at being the predominant A-lister of his generation. Dune was his big test at commanding a big-budget effects bonanza with him as the central focus, and he did very well in that respect. No telling whether Wonka will replicate that success, but I feel if it tanks, it'll be Paul King who takes the hit and not Chalamet, especially if he bounces back with Dune: Part II. Butler is in a very good position now, and provided he gets good notices as Feyd that will continue, but we've seen promising careers gutter quickly for reasons beyond talent. Is Butler a DiCaprio/Pitt, or is he a Kilmer? Butler needs to build the indie cred a bit more and diversify his portfolio before jumping headlong into big-budget flicks. That foundation will serve him very well, and by the looks of it he's doing just that.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Nov 9, 2023 22:13:38 GMT
I know that already about Butler. That was the point Pittsnogle_Goggins was making, and I wasn't disagreeing with it. Elvis is an IP of sorts (though if his performance wasn't so strongly reviewed, it still could have flopped). I was just pointing out that everyone seems to have accepted that Hollywood has decided Chalamet will be one of the premiere next generation leading men/movie stars, when he hasn't carried a single hit film of his name alone either. The Industry believes in his talent and star quality, so they will keep putting him in things designed to do well, even if it requires known IP to do so ( ie Dune, Wonka).So why on earth wouldn't the same approach apply to Butler, who if anything feels like an even more natural fit to Hollywood's search for the next generation of movie stars than Chalamet. Butler will be given a lot of help along the way. Elvis and his general reputation as a nice guy and a dedicated actor has engendered a lot of good will. I mean, it depends on your definition of hit. Call Me By Your Name made a very strong box office for Chalamet's big debut for a tiny indie movie with a shoestring budget. Armie Hammer was the biggest name associated with it at the time, but he's not exactly Tom Hanks. But Chalamet got the Oscar nomination, the film did very well, and he got a headstart at being the predominant A-lister of his generation. Dune was his big test at commanding a big-budget effects bonanza with him as the central focus, and he did very well in that respect. No telling whether Wonka will replicate that success, but I feel if it tanks, it'll be Paul King who takes the hit and not Chalamet, especially if he bounces back with Dune: Part II. Butler is in a very good position now, and provided he gets good notices as Feyd that will continue, but we've seen promising careers gutter quickly for reasons beyond talent. Is Butler a DiCaprio/Pitt, or is he a Kilmer? Butler needs to build the indie cred a bit more and diversify his portfolio before jumping headlong into big-budget flicks. That foundation will serve him very well, and by the looks of it he's doing just that. Kilmer was considered to be a nightmare as a person to work with by a lot of people (even though I love a lot of what he did an actor). Notably Joel Schumacher and John Frankenheimer. The reason for his decline in Hollywood was obvious. A lot of people thought he was a hellacious prick, and his reputation was in the mud as a result. By contrast, Butler has a reputation for being humble and a nice dude, and his professionalism on set is respected. As long as he doesn't suddenly turn into a diva that directors despise and openly badmouth like Kilmer, he should be fine. Kilmer, imho, if he had the same rep for professionalism and being easy going to work with as Leo/Pitt, would have stayed a permanent A-lister, even with the flops
|
|
|
Post by futuretrunks on Nov 10, 2023 5:29:30 GMT
Butler may sneakily have the strongest work ethic of any young actor or actress right now, and it bleeds into performance sometimes. I distinctly remember watching The Shannara Chronicles in bafflement at how well this random young dude I'd never seen or heard of was selling the emotion in individual scenes and the overall journey of the character. I'll cut him some slack on the vestigial Elvis voice in this trailer given how immediately he went into it after that movie; the full performance could work well.
Chalamet's interesting in that his purest acting gifts haven't really been mined in film yet. What he's doing in Miss Stevens in the theater performance stuff is so different in kind from his more understated work in high profile feature films. He's explosive there in a way he should tap into with maybe a Sam Mendes drama or something along those lines. Chalamet benefits from things being heightened, and may be a virtuoso at it, yet he's constantly doing restrained, which doesn't work for him as well unless he gets something rich like Huppert's role in The Piano Teacher.
|
|
|
Post by mhynson27 on Nov 10, 2023 13:39:10 GMT
The lack of Keoghan in that trailer is a bit concerning.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Nov 10, 2023 14:02:30 GMT
The lack of Keoghan in that trailer is a bit concerning. I think I read something from a long while ago that he isn't in it that much . Maybe it's a David Schwimmer/Simon Pegg-type situation.
|
|
|
Post by pupdurcs on Nov 11, 2023 14:09:24 GMT
Maybe Keoghan isn't in it much (or maybe he is. We'll see). But he's still a rising young star and recent Oscar nominee. So yes, him not being featured much in the trailer is telling, but also somewhat predictable.
The fact that the people marketing this project don't care to even take advantage of Keoghan's status (regardless of his actual screen time), boils down in a nutshell the problems/opportunities Keoghan is likely to face compared to peers like Butler (which has been talked about in detail on the Butler vs Keoghan thread). For all Keoghan has done to date, he's probably not percieved by people in this project's marketing department as someone who will move the needle or make the project seem more enticing, so they'll just roll with newly minted movie star Elvis guy as the main attraction.
|
|
|
Post by ibbi on Nov 12, 2023 17:02:27 GMT
You know, the real question is whether or not they'll be able to match these two epic fucking bad boys. Good luck, guys.
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Nov 12, 2023 19:02:15 GMT
You know, the real question is whether or not they'll be able to match these two epic fucking bad boys. Good luck, guys. All-timers, both of them. The creative department definitely has a tall order ahead of them.
|
|