|
|
Post by pacinoyes on Sept 11, 2019 20:39:24 GMT
Sorry for that subject line @tyler buddy - it gives me no happiness  Who is the one if they lose will break your heart the most? Assuming all 3 do get nodded ........who do you not want to see lose because you're too invested in their thespian genius? Can only pick one, it's not an everybody gets a prize contest!!  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2019 20:44:19 GMT
I don't know if I'll physically be able to handle Glenn Close and Annette Bening losses back to back.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephen on Sept 11, 2019 20:49:14 GMT
If we're talking purely based on overarching career longevity and amount of deserving work, Dafoe's really the only one that comes, er, close. I don't think simply accruing nominations automatically equals overdue status, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by TerryMontana on Sept 11, 2019 20:56:55 GMT
I pick Dafoe mainly because in that case this will be his third time in a row he'll be leaving empty handed, ehich is harsh.
On the other hand, I'm not yet entirely convinved he'll get a nod...
|
|
|
|
Post by wilcinema on Sept 13, 2019 8:08:48 GMT
Agree with stephen. Dafoe is the only one who can claim to be this year's Close. If he really got nominated for The Lighthouse, it would be his 3rd nomination in a row, and all for arthouse indie films, more or less challenging.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomasjerome on Sept 14, 2019 17:03:42 GMT
I mean if he gets nominated and lose again, Dafoe will be the most nominated male actor with no win alive. Basically the male equivalent of Glenn.
Worth to note that the guy had been in six BP nominated films (two winning), and had all around impressive career - many auteurs, wide range of characters from Jesus Christ to T.S. Eliot to Pasolini to Green Goblin to Van Gogh, but surprisingly not enough of awards recognition.
That said, I won't be heartbroken if he loses again because given the nature of the film, him getting nominated would be impressive enough.
|
|
